Suppr超能文献

为什么人们会参与疫苗试验?混合方法叙述性综合研究。

Why do people take part in vaccine trials? A mixed methods narrative synthesis.

机构信息

MSc student, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Sep;114:107861. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107861. Epub 2023 Jun 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To understand why individuals do or do not take part in vaccine trials, exploring the motivators and barriers to identify effective strategies to optimise recruitment in vaccine research.

METHODS

Qualitative studies and quantitative surveys capturing data on reasons for trial participation/decline were included. Six databases were searched from 1996 to October 2021. Two reviewers independently screened and assessed risk of bias. Results were reported narratively and analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We included 32 studies (17 qualitative; 12 quantitative; 3 mixed-methods) that covered a wide range of populations, geographical areas and disease types. Eight themes were identified 1) altruism; 2) potential for personal benefit; 3) perceived risks; 4) trust or distrust; 5) social networks; 6) stigma; 7) practical implications; 8) research vanguard.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide a detailed description of how potential participants weigh up their decisions to participate in vaccine trials, which could inform the planning and implementation of studies to enhance recruitment.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Clinical trial researchers should consider a patient-centered approach to recruitment, tailoring promoting material and attempt to understand fears, stigma and perceived risks. In addition, recognising the importance of trust and the key role friends, communities, family, and those in supervisory positions play in decisions.

摘要

目的

了解个体参与或不参与疫苗试验的原因,探讨参与疫苗研究的动机和障碍,以确定优化招募的有效策略。

方法

纳入了关于参与/拒绝试验原因的定性研究和定量调查,从 1996 年至 2021 年 10 月,我们在六个数据库中进行了检索。两位审查员独立筛选并评估了偏倚风险。结果以叙述性报告,并使用主题分析进行分析。

结果

我们纳入了 32 项研究(17 项定性研究;12 项定量研究;3 项混合方法研究),涵盖了广泛的人群、地理区域和疾病类型。确定了 8 个主题:1)利他主义;2)个人获益的可能性;3)感知风险;4)信任或不信任;5)社交网络;6)耻辱感;7)实际影响;8)研究先锋。

结论

我们的研究结果详细描述了潜在参与者如何权衡参与疫苗试验的决定,这可为加强招募的研究规划和实施提供信息。

实践意义

临床试验研究人员应考虑采用以患者为中心的招募方法,调整宣传材料,并尝试了解恐惧、耻辱感和感知风险。此外,要认识到信任的重要性,以及朋友、社区、家庭以及监督人员在决策中的关键作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验