Suppr超能文献

采用二区锚定区行胸主动脉腔内修复术治疗单纯B型主动脉夹层并测量假腔内压力

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair on Zone 2 Landing for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection with Measurement of Intra-False Lumen Pressure.

作者信息

Miura Shuhei, Kurimoto Yoshihiko, Maruyama Ryushi, Yamamoto Mika, Fusegawa Masato, Sasaki Keita, Masuda Takahiko, Nishioka Naritomo, Naraoka Syuichi

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Jan;98:137-145. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.06.020. Epub 2023 Jun 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the midterm results of zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD) by measuring the intra-false lumen pressure (IFLP) during TEVAR.

METHODS

Fifteen patients (9 men; mean age, 57 years) who underwent zone 2 TEVAR for uncomplicated TBAD were reviewed. Delta systolic pressure (defined as the difference between systemic pressure and IFLP) was measured before and after primary entry closure, and aortic remodeling and thrombo-occlusion of the false lumen (FL) were evaluated 12 months after TEVAR at 5 different levels of the aorta.

RESULTS

Median duration from onset to TEVAR was 34 days. The left subclavian artery was preserved in 13 patients (87%) by using stent graft fenestration. Although 1 patient (6%) had a transient cerebral infarction, there were no severe TEVAR-related complications. Entry closure significantly reduced delta systolic pressure (mm Hg) compared to preoperative pressure at all levels (distal arch: -22.2 ± 10.8 vs. -5.2 ± 9.6; Th8: -20.1 ± 12.4 vs. -6.9 ± 7.2; Th10: -14.3 ± 14.6 vs. -4.7 ± 7.5; Th12: -14.4 ± 14.5 vs. -4.9 ± 7.8; L2: -14.5 ± 14.2 vs. -3.4 ± 6.9). The percentages of aortic remodeling with expansion of the true lumen (distal arch: 82%; Th8: 80%; Th10: 54%; Th12: 45%; L2: 50%) and complete false lumen thrombosis (distal arch: 100%; Th8: 100%; Th10: 67%; Th12: 11%; L2: 0%) were approximately consistent with the change in delta systolic pressure. During a follow-up of 41 months, distal stent-induced new entry occurred in 2 patients (13%) requiring secondary intervention; however, there were no cases of FL enlargement or aorta-related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Zone 2 TEVAR for uncomplicated TBAD may prevent TEVAR-related complications. Measuring IFLP could be a new predictive marker for assessing the extent of aortic remodeling.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在通过测量胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)期间的假腔内压力(IFLP)来评估2区TEVAR治疗单纯性B型主动脉夹层(TBAD)的中期结果。

方法

回顾了15例(9例男性;平均年龄57岁)接受2区TEVAR治疗单纯性TBAD的患者。在初次入口封闭前后测量收缩压差(定义为体循环压力与IFLP之间的差值),并在TEVAR术后12个月在主动脉的5个不同水平评估主动脉重塑和假腔(FL)的血栓形成。

结果

从发病到TEVAR的中位时间为34天。13例患者(87%)通过使用带支架人工血管开窗术保留了左锁骨下动脉。虽然1例患者(6%)发生了短暂性脑梗死,但没有严重的与TEVAR相关的并发症。与术前相比,入口封闭在所有水平均显著降低了收缩压差(mmHg)(远心端弓部:-22.2±10.8对-5.2±9.6;T8:-20.1±12.4对-6.9±7.2;T10:-14.3±14.6对-4.7±7.5;T12:-14.4±14.5对-4.9±7.8;L2:-14.5±14.2对-3.4±6.9)。真腔扩大的主动脉重塑百分比(远心端弓部:82%;T8:80%;T10:54%;T12:45%;L2:50%)和完全假腔血栓形成百分比(远心端弓部:100%;T8:100%;T10:67%;T12:11%;L2:0%)与收缩压差的变化大致一致。在41个月的随访期间,2例患者(13%)发生了远端支架诱导的新入口,需要进行二次干预;然而,没有FL扩大或与主动脉相关的死亡病例。

结论

2区TEVAR治疗单纯性TBAD可能预防与TEVAR相关的并发症。测量IFLP可能是评估主动脉重塑程度的一种新的预测标志物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验