Department of Public Health, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Contraception. 2023 Sep;125:110096. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110096. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
Effective interventions to reduce the unmet need for family planning in low-income settings are limited. This study aimed to establish the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of Family Health=Family Wealth (FH=FW), a multilevel intervention aimed to increase high-efficacy contraceptive uptake among couples wanting to delay pregnancy.
A pilot quasi-experimental controlled trial was conducted in rural Uganda, with 70 couples wanting to delay pregnancy but not using contraceptives (n = 140). Two matched clusters (communities) were randomly allocated to receive FH=FW or a comparator intervention via coin toss. FH=FW included health system strengthening elements and four facilitated group sessions. Interviewer-administered questionnaires were conducted at baseline and at ∼7-month and ∼10-month follow-up, and process data gathered feasibility/acceptability outcomes.
Of 121 households visited in the intervention community, 63 couples were screened, and 35 enrolled. In the comparator, 61 households were visited, 45 couples screened, and 35 enrolled. Intervention attendance was 99%, fidelity was 96%, and 100% of participants reported being satisfied with the intervention. From no use at baseline, there was 31% more high efficacy contraceptive uptake at 7 months and 40% more at 10 months in intervention versus comparator couples (adjusted odds ratio = 1.68, 95% confidence interval = 0.78-3.62, p = 0.19). A decline in fertility desires was observed in intervention versus comparator participants from baseline (Wald χ = 9.87, p = 0.007; Cohen's d: 7 months, 0.06; 10 months, 0.49).
FH=FW is a feasible and acceptable intervention with strong promise in its effect on contraceptive uptake to be established in a future trial.
The FH=FW intervention addresses multilevel family planning barriers through four group dialogs with couples paired with efforts to reduce health system barriers. A quasi-experimental controlled trial provides preliminary support for its feasibility, acceptability, contraceptive uptake and fertility desire effects, and success in engaging both women and men.
在低收入环境中,减少计划生育未满足需求的有效干预措施有限。本研究旨在确定“家庭健康=家庭财富”(FH=FW)的可行性、可接受性和初步效果,这是一项旨在增加希望推迟怀孕的夫妇中高效果避孕措施使用率的多层次干预措施。
在乌干达农村进行了一项试点准实验对照试验,共有 70 对希望推迟怀孕但不使用避孕药具的夫妇(n=140)参与。通过抛硬币将两个匹配的集群(社区)随机分配接受 FH=FW 或对照干预。FH=FW 包括加强卫生系统的内容和四次促进小组会议。在基线和大约 7 个月和 10 个月的随访时进行了访谈者管理的问卷调查,并收集了可行性/可接受性结果的过程数据。
在干预社区中,对 121 户家庭进行了家访,对 63 对夫妇进行了筛查,有 35 对夫妇入组。在对照组中,对 61 户家庭进行了家访,对 45 对夫妇进行了筛查,有 35 对夫妇入组。干预的出席率为 99%,一致性为 96%,100%的参与者表示对干预措施感到满意。从基线时没有使用开始,干预组在 7 个月时的高效果避孕措施使用率增加了 31%,在 10 个月时增加了 40%,而对照组则增加了 31%(调整后的优势比=1.68,95%置信区间=0.78-3.62,p=0.19)。与对照组参与者相比,干预组参与者的生育意愿从基线开始下降(Wald χ=9.87,p=0.007;Cohen's d:7 个月,0.06;10 个月,0.49)。
FH=FW 是一种可行且可接受的干预措施,在未来的试验中具有很强的增加避孕措施使用率的潜力。
FH=FW 干预措施通过与夫妇进行四次小组对话来解决多层次的计划生育障碍,并努力减少卫生系统障碍。一项准实验对照试验初步支持其可行性、可接受性、避孕措施使用率和生育意愿的效果,以及成功吸引女性和男性参与。