Unaided visual assessment of ventral curvature during hypospadias repair is inferior to objective measurement using app goniometry.

OBJECTIVE

Failure to perform artificial erection or objectively assess ventral curvature (VC) during primary hypospadias repair is an important reason for residual/ recurrent chordee. The present study compares the accuracy of unaided visual inspection (UVI) with objective VC assessment using smartphone application (app) goniometry.

METHODS

All patients who underwent primary hypospadias repair between January 2021 and September 2022 were included. Assistant surgeons were asked to grade the degree of VC on UVI (after degloving and an artificial erection test) into: none, mild (<30 degree), severe(>30 degree). Lateral profile photograph was taken and angle measurement was performed on an android mobile application (Angulus). Correlation was performed with both methods of assessment.

RESULTS

During this period a total of 210 patients were analyzed; VC was noted in 40/138 (29%) cases of distal and in 62/72 (86%) cases of proximal hypospadias. Erroneous visual inspection was noted in 41/210 (20%; 95% CI 14-25%) on UVI (15 erroneously marked none while 26 marked mild). Among those found to have chordee, UVI assessed 39/82 (47%) as severe while app goniometry assessed 65/97 (67%) as severe. There was significant relative risk of labelling severe chordee as a mild one by UVI: 1.4 (95%CI 1-1.8; p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

UVI was erroneous in 20% of cases. UVI was less accurate in differentiating severe chordee from mild one. In 60% patients UVI alone could have led to erroneous VC assessment and thus wrong selection of technique. Further studies are required to validate our findings and standardize VC measurement using an app goniometry.