Unaided Visual Inspection for Assessment of Penile Curvature in the Clinical Setting of Hypospadias Surgery: Survey of Members of Society of Pediatric Urology (India).

PURPOSE

To compare the accuracy of unaided visual inspection (UVI) to Software App measurement (SAM) of penile curvature (PC) during hypospadias surgery.

METHODS

Seven clinical pictures of PC (15°-60°) taken during hypospadias repair were shared with 300 members of the Society of Pediatric Urology (India). The respondents were asked to assess the angles by UVI and indicate their preferred correction method of that PC. For each picture, the angles of curvature estimated by UVI were compared with the objective angle measured using an app (SAM), which was considered an accurate estimation. Statistical analysis was done using software; <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Ninety-one of 101 (90%) respondents preferred UVI to measure PC during hypospadias surgery. For 6/7 pictures, <40% of participants estimated the angle correctly by UVI ( < 0.001), with the difference in estimation being 3.6°-14.9°. For pictures with PC >30°, the error in UVI estimation was >10°, with no correlation between the accuracy of UVI estimate and surgeon experience. A significant proportion of surgeons chose the incorrect option for PC correction, which was the lowest (69%) for PC 35.8°.

CONCLUSIONS

Most surgeons preferred UVI to assess PC; UVI is an erroneous technique to measure PC angle, especially in the PC range 30°-60°, where the error was >10°. Most errors were an underestimation of the PC, irrespective of surgeon experience. There was a significant error in the choice of technique for PC correction for a PC of 35°. These results strongly support the objective assessment of PC using SAM during hypospadias repair.