School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK; School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Cortex. 2023 Sep;166:121-153. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.05.007. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
Frontal variant Alzheimer's disease (fvAD) is considered a rare form of Alzheimer's disease (AD) which may be misdiagnosed as behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). The literature has tended to conflate behavioural and executive dysfunction in fvAD cohorts and uses both AD diagnostic criteria and bvFTD diagnostic criteria to classify fvAD cohorts. The primary aim of this narrative synthesis was to summarise neuropsychological findings in fvAD cohorts in the context of established AD pathology.
EMBASE, PsycINFO, PROQUEST and MEDLINE databases were searched for studies eligible for inclusion. Studies with both neuropsychological and biomarker evidence were included in the final narrative synthesis.
Ten studies were reviewed, including samples totalling 342 fvAD participants, 178 typical AD participants and 250 bvFTD participants. The review revealed areas worthy of further investigation that may aid differential diagnosis, including the degree of executive dysfunction in fvAD cohorts relative to bvFTD cohorts, the onset of behavioural and cognitive symptomatology, and similarities between fvAD and typical AD cognitive profiles.
There was insufficient neuropsychological evidence to clearly differentiate fvAD and bvFTD cognitive phenotypes, however, the review has highlighted distinctive features of the two disorders that may guide differential diagnosis in future research. Moreover, the review has highlighted issues involving disparate diagnostic criteria used to classify fvAD cohorts, contributing to variation in findings.
额颞叶痴呆变异型(fvAD)被认为是阿尔茨海默病(AD)的一种罕见形式,可能被误诊为行为变异型额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)。文献往往将 fvAD 队列中的行为和执行功能混淆,并使用 AD 诊断标准和 bvFTD 诊断标准对 fvAD 队列进行分类。本叙述性综述的主要目的是总结在已建立的 AD 病理背景下 fvAD 队列的神经心理学发现。
在 EMBASE、PsycINFO、PROQUEST 和 MEDLINE 数据库中搜索符合纳入标准的研究。包括神经心理学和生物标志物证据的研究被纳入最终的叙述性综述。
共审查了 10 项研究,包括总共 342 名 fvAD 参与者、178 名典型 AD 参与者和 250 名 bvFTD 参与者的样本。该综述揭示了一些值得进一步研究的领域,这些领域可能有助于鉴别诊断,包括 fvAD 队列相对于 bvFTD 队列的执行功能障碍程度、行为和认知症状的发病时间以及 fvAD 和典型 AD 认知特征之间的相似性。
目前尚无足够的神经心理学证据能够明确区分 fvAD 和 bvFTD 的认知表型,但该综述强调了这两种疾病的独特特征,这可能有助于未来研究中的鉴别诊断。此外,该综述还强调了用于分类 fvAD 队列的不同诊断标准所涉及的问题,这导致了研究结果的差异。