• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Publication Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence.人工智能时代的出版伦理。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Aug 26;39(33):e249. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e249.
2
Research integrity in the era of artificial intelligence: Challenges and responses.人工智能时代的研究诚信:挑战与应对。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jul 5;103(27):e38811. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038811.
3
The role of artificial intelligence in scientific publishing: Perspectives from Hospital Pharmacy.人工智能在科学出版中的作用:医院药学视角。
4
What is the rate of text generated by artificial intelligence over a year of publication in Orthopedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research? Analysis of 425 articles before versus after the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022.在《矫形外科与创伤学:手术与研究》杂志上发表的人工智能文本在一年时间内的生成率是多少?分析 2022 年 11 月 ChatGPT 发布前后的 425 篇文章。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023 Dec;109(8):103694. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103694. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
5
Guiding principles and proposed classification system for the responsible adoption of artificial intelligence in scientific writing in medicine.医学科学写作中负责任采用人工智能的指导原则和拟议分类系统。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Nov 16;6:1283353. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1283353. eCollection 2023.
6
Fake academic writing: ethics during chatbot era.虚假学术写作:人工智能时代的伦理道德。
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2023 Jun 1;24(2):88-89. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2023.24.02.01.
7
Ethical dilemmas in scientific publication: pitfalls and solutions for editors.科学出版中的伦理困境:编辑面临的陷阱与解决方法
Rev Saude Publica. 2006 Aug;40 Spec no.:24-9. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102006000400004.
8
Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic Writing and an Example Framework for Peer Review in Nephrology Academia: A Narrative Review.人工智能用于学术写作中的伦理困境以及肾脏病学术界同行评审的示例框架:一项叙述性综述
Clin Pract. 2023 Dec 30;14(1):89-105. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14010008.
9
Plagiarism: A Bird's Eye View.抄袭:鸟瞰图。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Nov 20;38(45):e373. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e373.
10
[Translated article] The role of artificial intelligence in scientific publishing: perspectives from hospital pharmacy.[译文] 人工智能在科学出版中的作用:医院药学视角。
Farm Hosp. 2024 Sep-Oct;48(5):T246-T251. doi: 10.1016/j.farma.2024.07.009. Epub 2024 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Turkish medical oncologists' perspectives on integrating artificial intelligence: knowledge, attitudes, and ethical considerations.土耳其医学肿瘤学家对整合人工智能的看法:知识、态度及伦理考量
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 4;26(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01249-7.
2
Defining the Boundaries of AI Use in Scientific Writing: A Comparative Review of Editorial Policies.界定科学写作中人工智能使用的界限:编辑政策的比较综述
J Korean Med Sci. 2025 Jun 16;40(23):e187. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e187.
3
Artificial Intelligence and Publishing Ethics: A Narrative Review and SWOT Analysis.人工智能与出版伦理:叙事性综述及SWOT分析
Cureus. 2025 May 14;17(5):e84098. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84098. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Artificial intelligence: Role in healthcare.人工智能:在医疗保健中的作用。
J Postgrad Med. 2025 Apr 1;71(2):57-60. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_95_25. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
5
Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence Use for In-House Ethics Checks of Journal Submissions.人工智能用于期刊投稿内部伦理审查的前景
J Korean Med Sci. 2025 Jun 2;40(21):e170. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e170.
6
Can ChatGPT Boost Students' Employment Confidence? A Pioneering Booster for Career Readiness.ChatGPT能提升学生的就业信心吗?职业准备的开创性助推器。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 14;15(3):362. doi: 10.3390/bs15030362.
7
On the ethical and moral dimensions of using artificial intelligence for evidence synthesis.关于使用人工智能进行证据综合的伦理和道德维度。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Mar 19;5(3):e0004348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004348. eCollection 2025.
8
Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review: Enhancing Efficiency While Preserving Integrity.同行评审中的人工智能:提高效率并保持公正性。
J Korean Med Sci. 2025 Feb 24;40(7):e92. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e92.
9
Editorial Message.编辑寄语。
Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2025 Jan;30(1):1-4. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2024.1.20241111.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Writing: Current Trends.人工智能在科学写作中的伦理应用:当前趋势
J Hum Lact. 2024 May;40(2):211-215. doi: 10.1177/08903344241235160. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
2
How journals are fighting back against a wave of questionable images.期刊如何反击一波有问题的图像。
Nature. 2024 Feb;626(8000):697-698. doi: 10.1038/d41586-024-00372-6.
3
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Revolutionary Ally or an Ethical Dilemma?医疗保健中的人工智能:革命性盟友还是伦理困境?
Balkan Med J. 2024 Mar 1;41(2):87-88. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2024.2024-250124. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
4
Balancing Innovation and Integrity: The Role of AI in Research and Scientific Writing.平衡创新与诚信:人工智能在研究和科学写作中的作用
Nat Sci Sleep. 2023 Dec 29;15:1153-1156. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S455765. eCollection 2023.
5
Chatbots, generative AI, and scholarly manuscripts: WAME recommendations on chatbots and generative artificial intelligence in relation to scholarly publications.聊天机器人、生成式人工智能与学术手稿:世界医学编辑协会关于聊天机器人和生成式人工智能在学术出版方面的建议
Curr Med Res Opin. 2024 Jan;40(1):11-13. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2286102. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
6
More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 - a new record.2023年有超过1万篇研究论文被撤回,创下了新纪录。
Nature. 2023 Dec;624(7992):479-481. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-03974-8.
7
Editors' Statement on the Responsible Use of Generative AI Technologies in Scholarly Journal Publishing.编辑关于在学术期刊出版中负责任使用生成式人工智能技术的声明。
Am J Bioeth. 2024 Mar;24(3):5-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2292437. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
8
Research Integrity: Where We Are and Where We Are Heading.研究诚信:我们的现状与未来走向。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Dec 4;38(47):e405. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e405.
9
Causes for Retraction in the Biomedical Literature: A Systematic Review of Studies of Retraction Notices.撤稿原因分析:撤稿通知研究的系统综述。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Oct 23;38(41):e333. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e333.
10
GPTZero Performance in Identifying Artificial Intelligence-Generated Medical Texts: A Preliminary Study.GPTZero 在识别人工智能生成的医学文本方面的性能:一项初步研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Sep 25;38(38):e319. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e319.

人工智能时代的出版伦理。

Publication Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Türkiye.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Aug 26;39(33):e249. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e249.

DOI:10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e249
PMID:39189714
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11347185/
Abstract

The application of new technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI), to science affects the way and methodology in which research is conducted. While the responsible use of AI brings many innovations and benefits to science and humanity, its unethical use poses a serious threat to scientific integrity and literature. Even in the absence of malicious use, the Chatbot output itself, as a software application based on AI, carries the risk of containing biases, distortions, irrelevancies, misrepresentations and plagiarism. Therefore, the use of complex AI algorithms raises concerns about bias, transparency and accountability, requiring the development of new ethical rules to protect scientific integrity. Unfortunately, the development and writing of ethical codes cannot keep up with the pace of development and implementation of technology. The main purpose of this narrative review is to inform readers, authors, reviewers and editors about new approaches to publication ethics in the era of AI. It specifically focuses on tips on how to disclose the use of AI in your manuscript, how to avoid publishing entirely AI-generated text, and current standards for retraction.

摘要

新技术,如人工智能(AI),在科学中的应用影响了研究的方式和方法。虽然负责任地使用 AI 为科学和人类带来了许多创新和益处,但它的不道德使用对科学完整性和文献构成了严重威胁。即使没有恶意使用,基于 AI 的聊天机器人输出本身作为一种软件应用程序,也存在包含偏差、扭曲、不相关、错误陈述和剽窃的风险。因此,复杂的 AI 算法的使用引发了对偏见、透明度和问责制的关注,需要制定新的道德规则来保护科学的完整性。不幸的是,道德规范的制定和编写跟不上技术的发展和实施的步伐。本叙述性评论的主要目的是让读者、作者、审稿人和编辑了解 AI 时代出版伦理的新方法。它特别侧重于如何在稿件中披露 AI 的使用、如何避免发表完全由 AI 生成的文本,以及当前的撤稿标准。