Suppr超能文献

肝门周围胆管癌手术的横径和纵径边界:当 R1 定义与不同预后相关时。

Radial and longitudinal margins in surgery of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: When R1 definition is associated with different prognosis.

机构信息

Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Surgery. 2023 Sep;174(3):447-456. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.05.014. Epub 2023 Jun 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Infiltrated margins of resection (R1) and lymph node invasion are dominant negative predictors of survival in patients with a resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Less clear is whether survival predictors stratify differently between R0 (tumor-free margins) and R1 patients and whether the prognosis of the latter patients is influenced by the pattern of neoplastic infiltration (ie, radial versus longitudinal infiltration). We retrospectively evaluated a series of reported resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma to obtain insights on the predictive power of these histologic features.

METHODS

The study includes 264 patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma treated between 2004 and 2019 in our center and followed up for >18 months. There were 176 patients with R0 (66.6%) and 88 patients with R1 (33.3%), 31 with radial infiltration only, 30 with longitudinal infiltration only, and 27 with both infiltration patterns. In all patients, the criteria for resection was the absence of metastatic involvement (ie, distant organ metastases, liver metastases, and lymph node metastases beyond the hepatoduodenal ligament). Histopathologic specimens of the resected tumors were centrally reviewed by a pathologist unaware of the clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Three- and 5-year long-term survival were significantly better in R0 (respectively) compared to R1 patients (55% and 42% vs 42% and 18%, respectively, P < .05). In R1 patients with radial infiltration only and those with radial + longitudinal infiltration, both disease-free and overall survival were worse than those with longitudinal infiltration only (median disease-free survival of 18 and 23 months, respectively, P < .05, median overall survival of 33 and 39 months, respectively, P < .05). At multivariable analysis, nodal status, side of hepatectomy, grading, and presence of radial margin infiltration were associated with long-term outcome.

CONCLUSION

Radial infiltration of resection margins enhances the negative prognostic value of R1 margins in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients and should specifically be accounted for in the prediction of the outcome of adjuvant therapy.

摘要

背景

在可切除的肝门部胆管癌患者中,浸润性切缘(R1)和淋巴结侵犯是生存的主要负性预测因素。尚不清楚生存预测因素在 R0(无肿瘤切缘)和 R1 患者之间是否有不同的分层,以及后者的预后是否受到肿瘤浸润模式(即,放射状与纵向浸润)的影响。我们回顾性评估了一系列已报道的肝门部胆管癌切除术,以深入了解这些组织学特征的预测能力。

方法

本研究纳入了 2004 年至 2019 年在我中心接受治疗并随访时间超过 18 个月的 264 例肝门部胆管癌患者。其中 R0 患者 176 例(66.6%),R1 患者 88 例(33.3%),单纯放射状浸润 31 例,单纯纵向浸润 30 例,两种浸润模式均存在 27 例。所有患者的切除标准为无转移受累(即远处器官转移、肝转移和肝十二指肠韧带外淋巴结转移)。由一名对临床结果不知情的病理学家对切除肿瘤的组织病理学标本进行中心审查。

结果

R0 患者的 3 年和 5 年长期生存率明显高于 R1 患者(分别为 55%和 42%比 42%和 18%,P <.05)。在单纯放射状浸润和放射状+纵向浸润的 R1 患者中,无病生存率和总生存率均明显低于单纯纵向浸润的患者(无病生存率分别为 18 个月和 23 个月,P <.05,总生存率分别为 33 个月和 39 个月,P <.05)。多变量分析显示,淋巴结状态、肝切除术侧、分级和存在放射状切缘浸润与长期预后相关。

结论

切缘的放射状浸润增强了 R1 切缘在肝门部胆管癌患者中的负性预后价值,在预测辅助治疗的结果时应特别考虑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验