• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

驾驶员在自动驾驶场景中如何感知风险?一项 fNIRS 神经影像学研究。

How Do Drivers Perceive Risks During Automated Driving Scenarios? An fNIRS Neuroimaging Study.

机构信息

National Transport Design Centre, Centre for Future Transport and Cities, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.

School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing (SATM), Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2024 Sep;66(9):2244-2263. doi: 10.1177/00187208231185705. Epub 2023 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1177/00187208231185705
PMID:37357740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11344369/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Using brain haemodynamic responses to measure perceived risk from traffic complexity during automated driving.

BACKGROUND

Although well-established during manual driving, the effects of driver risk perception during automated driving remain unknown. The use of fNIRS in this paper for assessing drivers' states posits it could become a novel method for measuring risk perception.

METHODS

Twenty-three volunteers participated in an empirical driving simulator experiment with automated driving capability. Driving conditions involved suburban and urban scenarios with varying levels of traffic complexity, culminating in an unexpected hazardous event. Perceived risk was measured via fNIRS within the prefrontal cortical haemoglobin oxygenation and from self-reports.

RESULTS

Prefrontal cortical haemoglobin oxygenation levels significantly increased, following self-reported perceived risk and traffic complexity, particularly during the hazardous scenario.

CONCLUSION

This paper has demonstrated that fNIRS is a valuable research tool for measuring variations in perceived risk from traffic complexity during highly automated driving. Even though the responsibility over the driving task is delegated to the automated system and dispositional trust is high, drivers perceive moderate risk when traffic complexity builds up gradually, reflected in a corresponding significant increase in blood oxygenation levels, with both subjective (self-reports) and objective (fNIRS) increasing further during the hazardous scenario.

APPLICATION

Little is known regarding the effects of drivers' risk perception with automated driving. Building upon our experimental findings, future work can use fNIRS to investigate the mental processes for risk assessment and the effects of perceived risk on driving behaviours to promote the safe adoption of automated driving technology.

摘要

目的

利用大脑血液动力学反应来测量自动驾驶中感知到的交通复杂性风险。

背景

尽管在手动驾驶中已经得到了很好的证实,但在自动驾驶中驾驶员风险感知的影响仍然未知。本文使用 fNIRS 来评估驾驶员的状态,这可能成为一种测量风险感知的新方法。

方法

23 名志愿者参与了具有自动驾驶功能的实证驾驶模拟器实验。驾驶条件涉及到具有不同交通复杂性水平的郊区和城市场景,最终出现了意外的危险事件。通过 fNIRS 在大脑前额皮质的血红蛋白氧合作用和自我报告来测量感知风险。

结果

自我报告的感知风险和交通复杂性增加后,大脑前额皮质的血红蛋白氧合水平显著增加,特别是在危险场景中。

结论

本文证明了 fNIRS 是一种测量高度自动驾驶中感知到的交通复杂性风险变化的有价值的研究工具。即使驾驶任务的责任委托给自动化系统,且处置信任度很高,当交通复杂性逐渐增加时,驾驶员仍会感知到中等风险,这反映在血液氧合水平的相应显著增加上,主观(自我报告)和客观(fNIRS)在危险场景中进一步增加。

应用

对于自动化驾驶中驾驶员风险感知的影响知之甚少。在我们的实验结果的基础上,未来的工作可以使用 fNIRS 来研究风险评估的心理过程以及感知风险对驾驶行为的影响,以促进自动化驾驶技术的安全采用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/11344369/e6fb8c566110/10.1177_00187208231185705-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/11344369/ccd7858a06ef/10.1177_00187208231185705-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/11344369/ff2245451cd1/10.1177_00187208231185705-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/11344369/23234ee9d7b7/10.1177_00187208231185705-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/11344369/ae0652394b04/10.1177_00187208231185705-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/11344369/d292c65ff330/10.1177_00187208231185705-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/11344369/bc4b2f964bcb/10.1177_00187208231185705-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/11344369/6f896b014b2b/10.1177_00187208231185705-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/11344369/4e040fdf1b09/10.1177_00187208231185705-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/11344369/e6fb8c566110/10.1177_00187208231185705-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/11344369/ccd7858a06ef/10.1177_00187208231185705-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/11344369/ff2245451cd1/10.1177_00187208231185705-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/11344369/23234ee9d7b7/10.1177_00187208231185705-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/11344369/ae0652394b04/10.1177_00187208231185705-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/11344369/d292c65ff330/10.1177_00187208231185705-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/11344369/bc4b2f964bcb/10.1177_00187208231185705-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/11344369/6f896b014b2b/10.1177_00187208231185705-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/11344369/4e040fdf1b09/10.1177_00187208231185705-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/11344369/e6fb8c566110/10.1177_00187208231185705-fig9.jpg

相似文献

1
How Do Drivers Perceive Risks During Automated Driving Scenarios? An fNIRS Neuroimaging Study.驾驶员在自动驾驶场景中如何感知风险?一项 fNIRS 神经影像学研究。
Hum Factors. 2024 Sep;66(9):2244-2263. doi: 10.1177/00187208231185705. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
2
Fostering Drivers' Trust in Automated Driving Styles: The Role of Driver Perception of Automated Driving Maneuvers.促进驾驶员对自动驾驶风格的信任:驾驶员对自动驾驶动作感知的作用。
Hum Factors. 2024 Jul;66(7):1961-1976. doi: 10.1177/00187208231189661. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
3
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy in the evaluation of urban rail transit drivers' mental workload under simulated driving conditions.在模拟驾驶条件下评估城市轨道交通驾驶员精神工作负荷的功能近红外光谱。
Ergonomics. 2019 Mar;62(3):406-419. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1535093. Epub 2019 Jan 27.
4
An fNIRS dataset for driving risk cognition of passengers in highly automated driving scenarios.用于高自动化驾驶场景中乘客驾驶风险认知的功能性近红外光谱数据集。
Sci Data. 2024 May 28;11(1):546. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03353-6.
5
Keep Your Scanners Peeled: Gaze Behavior as a Measure of Automation Trust During Highly Automated Driving.密切关注:在高度自动驾驶过程中,注视行为作为衡量自动化信任度的指标
Hum Factors. 2016 May;58(3):509-19. doi: 10.1177/0018720815625744. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
6
Driving Aggressively or Conservatively? Investigating the Effects of Automated Vehicle Interaction Type and Road Event on Drivers' Trust and Preferred Driving Style.激进驾驶还是保守驾驶?研究自动驾驶车辆交互类型和道路事件对驾驶员信任和偏好驾驶风格的影响。
Hum Factors. 2024 Sep;66(9):2166-2178. doi: 10.1177/00187208231181199. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
7
Post Take-Over Performance Varies in Drivers of Automated and Connected Vehicle Technology in Near-Miss Scenarios.接管后在险些发生碰撞的场景中,自动化和联网车辆技术驱动因素的性能各异。
Hum Factors. 2024 Nov;66(11):2503-2517. doi: 10.1177/00187208231219184. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
8
Assessing Drivers' Trust of Automated Vehicle Driving Styles With a Two-Part Mixed Model of Intervention Tendency and Magnitude.采用干预倾向和幅度的两部分混合模型评估驾驶员对自动驾驶车辆驾驶风格的信任
Hum Factors. 2021 Mar;63(2):197-209. doi: 10.1177/0018720819880363. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
9
Driver-Automated Vehicle Interaction in Mixed Traffic: Types of Interaction and Drivers' Driving Styles.混合交通中的驾驶员-自动驾驶车辆交互:交互类型和驾驶员的驾驶风格。
Hum Factors. 2024 Feb;66(2):544-561. doi: 10.1177/00187208221088358. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
10
Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.通过非驾驶任务评估自动驾驶员支持系统故障期间驾驶员的反应。
J Safety Res. 2017 Jun;61:149-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comprehensive Review of Unobtrusive Biosensing in Intelligent Vehicles: Sensors, Algorithms, and Integration Challenges.智能车辆中无创生物传感的综合综述:传感器、算法及集成挑战
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jun 18;12(6):669. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12060669.
2
Safety Decision-Making for Autonomous Vehicles Integrating Passenger Physiological States by fNIRS.通过功能近红外光谱技术整合乘客生理状态的自动驾驶车辆安全决策
Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2025 May 13;6:0205. doi: 10.34133/cbsystems.0205. eCollection 2025.
3
An fNIRS dataset for driving risk cognition of passengers in highly automated driving scenarios.

本文引用的文献

1
The NIRS Brain AnalyzIR Toolbox.近红外光谱脑分析仪工具箱
Algorithms. 2018 May;11(5). doi: 10.3390/a11050073. Epub 2018 May 16.
2
A Methodological Review of fNIRS in Driving Research: Relevance to the Future of Autonomous Vehicles.近红外光谱技术在驾驶研究中的方法学综述:与自动驾驶汽车未来的相关性
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Apr 22;15:637589. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.637589. eCollection 2021.
3
Effect of cognitive load on drivers' State and task performance during automated driving: Introducing a novel method for determining stabilisation time following take-over of control.
用于高自动化驾驶场景中乘客驾驶风险认知的功能性近红外光谱数据集。
Sci Data. 2024 May 28;11(1):546. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03353-6.
4
Adopting Stimulus Detection Tasks for Cognitive Workload Assessment: Some Considerations.采用刺激检测任务进行认知负荷评估:几点思考。
Hum Factors. 2024 Dec;66(12):2561-2568. doi: 10.1177/00187208241228049. Epub 2024 Jan 21.
5
From brain to worksite: the role of fNIRS in cognitive studies and worker safety.从大脑到工作场所:近红外光谱在认知研究和工人安全中的作用。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 25;11:1256895. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1256895. eCollection 2023.
认知负荷对自动驾驶中驾驶员状态和任务表现的影响:引入一种新的方法来确定接管控制后的稳定时间。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;151:105967. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105967. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
4
Best practices for fNIRS publications.功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)出版物的最佳实践。
Neurophotonics. 2021 Jan;8(1):012101. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.8.1.012101. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
5
Exploring the Brain Responses to Driving Fatigue Through Simultaneous EEG and fNIRS Measurements.通过同时进行 EEG 和 fNIRS 测量来探索驾驶疲劳时的大脑反应。
Int J Neural Syst. 2020 Jan;30(1):1950018. doi: 10.1142/S0129065719500187. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
6
In a heart beat: Using driver's physiological changes to determine the quality of a takeover in highly automated vehicles.心跳之间:利用驾驶员的生理变化来判断高度自动化车辆接管的质量。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Oct;131:180-190. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
7
The More You Know: Trust Dynamics and Calibration in Highly Automated Driving and the Effects of Take-Overs, System Malfunction, and System Transparency.知之愈多:高度自动化驾驶中的信任动态和校准,以及接管、系统故障和系统透明度的影响。
Hum Factors. 2020 Aug;62(5):718-736. doi: 10.1177/0018720819853686. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
8
A Review of Psychophysiological Measures to Assess Cognitive States in Real-World Driving.评估现实驾驶中认知状态的心理生理测量方法综述
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Mar 19;13:57. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00057. eCollection 2019.
9
Current Status and Issues Regarding Pre-processing of fNIRS Neuroimaging Data: An Investigation of Diverse Signal Filtering Methods Within a General Linear Model Framework.功能近红外光谱神经成像数据预处理的现状与问题:通用线性模型框架内多种信号滤波方法的研究
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jan 11;12:505. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00505. eCollection 2018.
10
Activity of frontal pole cortex reflecting hedonic tone of food and drink: fNIRS study in humans.反映食物和饮料享乐色调的额极皮层活动:人类功能性近红外光谱研究。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 1;8(1):16197. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34690-3.