• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住宅建筑的温室气体排放和能源消耗:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

GHG emissions and energy consumption of residential buildings-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.

Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.

出版信息

Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Jun 26;195(7):885. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11515-z.

DOI:10.1007/s10661-023-11515-z
PMID:37358677
Abstract

Residential buildings generate significant greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and consume energy throughout their life cycle. In recent years, research on GHG emissions and energy consumption of buildings has developed rapidly in response to the growing climate change and energy crisis. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is an important method for evaluating the environmental impacts of the building sector. However, LCA studies of buildings show widely varying outcomes across the world. Besides, environmental impact assessment from a whole life cycle perspective has been undeveloped and slow. Our work presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of LCA studies on GHG emissions and energy consumption in the preuse, use, and demolition stages of residential buildings. We aim to examine the differences among the results of diverse case studies and demonstrate the spectrum of variations under contextual disparities. Results show that residential building emits about 2928 kg GHG emission and consumes about 7430 kWh of energy per m of gross building area on average throughout the life cycle. Residential buildings have an average GHG emission of 84.81% in the use phase, followed by the preuse phase and demolition phase; the mean energy consumption in the use stage occupied the largest share of 84.52%, followed by preuse stage and demolition stage. GHG emissions and energy use vary significantly in different regions due to different building types, natural conditions, and lifestyles. Our study stresses the compelling requirement to slash GHG emissions and optimize energy consumption from residential buildings by use of low carbon building materials, energy structure adjustment, consumer behavior transformation, etc.

摘要

住宅建筑在其生命周期内会产生大量的温室气体 (GHG) 排放并消耗能源。近年来,随着气候变化和能源危机的加剧,建筑领域的 GHG 排放和能源消耗研究迅速发展。生命周期评估 (LCA) 是评估建筑部门环境影响的重要方法。然而,世界各地的建筑 LCA 研究结果差异很大。此外,从全生命周期的角度进行环境影响评估还不够发达和缓慢。我们的工作对住宅建筑在预使用、使用和拆除阶段的 GHG 排放和能源消耗的 LCA 研究进行了系统的回顾和荟萃分析。我们旨在检查不同案例研究结果之间的差异,并展示在背景差异下的变化范围。结果表明,住宅建筑在整个生命周期内每平方米总建筑面积平均排放约 2928 公斤 GHG 排放,消耗约 7430 千瓦时的能源。住宅建筑在使用阶段的平均 GHG 排放量为 84.81%,其次是预使用阶段和拆除阶段;使用阶段的平均能源消耗占比最大,为 84.52%,其次是预使用阶段和拆除阶段。由于不同的建筑类型、自然条件和生活方式,不同地区的 GHG 排放和能源使用存在显著差异。我们的研究强调了通过使用低碳建筑材料、调整能源结构、改变消费者行为等措施来减少住宅建筑的 GHG 排放和优化能源消耗的迫切需求。

相似文献

1
GHG emissions and energy consumption of residential buildings-a systematic review and meta-analysis.住宅建筑的温室气体排放和能源消耗:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Jun 26;195(7):885. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11515-z.
2
Unveiling the greenhouse gas emissions of drinking water treatment plant throughout the construction and operation stages based on life cycle assessment.基于生命周期评估,揭示饮用水处理厂在整个建设和运营阶段的温室气体排放。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2024 Mar 1;272:116043. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116043. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
3
Mitigation of CO2 emissions from the EU-15 building stock: beyond the EU Directive on the Energy Performance of Buildings.欧盟15国建筑存量二氧化碳排放的减排:超越欧盟建筑能源性能指令
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2006 Sep;13(5):350-8. doi: 10.1065/espr2005.12.289.
4
Greenhouse gas emissions accounting of urban residential consumption: a household survey based approach.城市居民消费的温室气体排放核算:基于住户调查的方法。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055642. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
5
Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment of Energy Technologies under Different Greenhouse Gas Concentration Pathways.不同温室气体浓度路径下能源技术的动态生命周期评估。
Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Jan 18;56(2):1395-1404. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c05923. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
6
Estimating the Additional Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Korea: Focused on Demolition of Asbestos Containing Materials in Building.估算韩国额外的温室气体排放量:聚焦于建筑物中含石棉材料的拆除。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Sep 12;13(9):902. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13090902.
7
Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Marginal Cost of Carbon Abatement for Residential Buildings under California's 2019 Title 24 Energy Codes.量化加州 2019 年 Title 24 能源法规下住宅建筑的温室气体排放和碳减排的边际成本。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Oct 15;53(20):12121-12129. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b02869. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
8
Integrating work into life helps reduce residential greenhouse gas emissions.将工作融入生活有助于减少家庭温室气体排放。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Feb;351:119974. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119974. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
9
Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Asphalt Pavement Construction: A Case Study in China.沥青路面施工中的温室气体排放:中国的一个案例研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Mar 22;13(3):351. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13030351.
10
The evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions from sewage treatment with urbanization: Understanding the opportunities and challenges for climate change mitigation in China's low-carbon pilot city, Shenzhen.城市化进程中污水处理的温室气体排放评估:理解中国低碳试点城市深圳气候变化缓解的机遇和挑战。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jan 10;855:158629. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158629. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating climate-smart practices in forestry: insights from Europe and America.将气候智能型做法融入林业:来自欧洲和美洲的见解。
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jul 17;16:1583294. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1583294. eCollection 2025.