• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三野与二野淋巴结清扫在微创食管癌根治术中的比较:一项随机试验的 3 年生存结果。

Three-Field Versus Two-Field Lymphadenectomy in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: 3-Year Survival Outcomes of a Randomized Trial.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Sixth Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

The Second Clinical College of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;30(11):6730-6736. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13748-1. Epub 2023 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-023-13748-1
PMID:37358684
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been used widely for the treatment of esophageal cancer. However, the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy for esophagectomy in MIE remains unclear. This trial aimed to investigate the 3-year survival and recurrence outcomes in a randomized controlled trial comparing MIE with either three-field lymphadenectomy (3-FL) or two-field lymphadenectomy (2-FL).

METHODS

Between June 2016 and May 2019, 76 patients with resectable thoracic esophageal cancer were enrolled in a single-center randomized controlled trial and randomly assigned to MIE that included either 3-FL or 2-FL at a 1:1 ratio (n = 38 patients each). The survival outcomes and recurrence patterns were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The 3-year cumulative overall survival (OS) probability was 68.2 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 52.72-83.68 %) for the 3-FL group and 68.6 % (95 % CI, 53.12-84.08 %) for the 2-FL group. The 3-year cumulative probability of disease-free survival (DFS) was 66.3 % (95 % CI, 50.03-82.57 %) for the 3-FL group and 67.1 % (95 % CI, 51.03-83.17 %) for the 2-FL group.. The OS and DFS differences in the two groups were comparable. The overall recurrence rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.737). The incidence of cervical lymphatic recurrence in the 2-FL group was higher than in the 3-FL group (P = 0.051).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with 2-FL in MIE, 3-FL tended to prevent cervical lymphatic recurrence. However, it was not found to add survival benefit for the patients with thoracic esophageal cancer.

摘要

背景

微创食管切除术(MIE)已广泛用于治疗食管癌。然而,MIE 中食管切除术的最佳淋巴结清扫范围仍不清楚。本试验旨在研究一项随机对照试验中,MIE 与三野淋巴结清扫(3-FL)或二野淋巴结清扫(2-FL)相比的 3 年生存率和复发结果。

方法

2016 年 6 月至 2019 年 5 月,76 例可切除胸段食管癌患者入组单中心随机对照试验,并按 1:1 比例随机分为 MIE 组,包括 3-FL 或 2-FL(每组 38 例)。比较两组患者的生存结局和复发模式。

结果

3-FL 组 3 年累积总生存率(OS)概率为 68.2%(95%置信区间[CI],52.72%-83.68%),2-FL 组为 68.6%(95%CI,53.12%-84.08%)。3-FL 组 3 年无病生存率(DFS)累积概率为 66.3%(95%CI,50.03%-82.57%),2-FL 组为 67.1%(95%CI,51.03%-83.17%)。两组间 OS 和 DFS 差异无统计学意义。两组总体复发率无显著差异(P = 0.737)。2-FL 组颈淋巴结复发率高于 3-FL 组(P = 0.051)。

结论

与 MIE 中的 2-FL 相比,3-FL 倾向于预防颈淋巴结复发。然而,它并未发现对胸段食管癌患者有生存获益。

相似文献

1
Three-Field Versus Two-Field Lymphadenectomy in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: 3-Year Survival Outcomes of a Randomized Trial.三野与二野淋巴结清扫在微创食管癌根治术中的比较:一项随机试验的 3 年生存结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;30(11):6730-6736. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13748-1. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
2
Three-Field Lymphadenectomy in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma.微创食管癌根治术中的三野淋巴结清扫术。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Sep;112(3):928-934. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.09.022. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
3
Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).机器人辅助食管切除术(RAE)与传统微创食管切除术(MIE)治疗可切除的食管鳞癌:一项多中心前瞻性随机对照试验的方案(RAMIE 试验,机器人辅助微创食管切除术)。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jun 21;19(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5799-6.
4
[Efficacy comparison between two-field and three-field lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].[胸段食管鳞状细胞癌两野与三野淋巴结清扫术的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 25;19(9):990-994.
5
Esophagectomy With Three-Field Versus Two-Field Lymphadenectomy for Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: Long-Term Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trial.胸中段和胸下段食管癌行三野与二野淋巴结清扫根治术的比较:一项随机临床试验的长期结果。
J Thorac Oncol. 2021 Feb;16(2):310-317. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.10.157. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
6
Robotic Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-analysis.机器人与传统微创食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2023 Jul 1;278(1):39-50. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005782. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
7
Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between 3-field and modern 2-field lymph node dissections for thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.胸段食管鳞状细胞癌三野与现代两野淋巴结清扫术的短期和长期疗效比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Sep 1;29(3):434-441. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz108.
8
Comparison of survival and recurrence pattern between two-field and three-field lymph node dissections for upper thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.比较二野和三野淋巴结清扫术治疗中上胸段食管鳞癌的生存和复发模式。
J Thorac Oncol. 2010 May;5(5):707-12. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181d3ccb2.
9
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy is safe and feasible for treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.新辅助化疗后行微创食管切除术治疗食管鳞癌是安全可行的。
Thorac Cancer. 2018 Feb;9(2):310-315. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12590. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
10
Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.机器人辅助微创食管癌根治术与电视辅助微创食管癌根治术治疗食管癌的短期疗效比较:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2022 Apr;15(2):270-278. doi: 10.1111/ases.12992. Epub 2021 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Study on the learning curve for thoracoscopic and laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer.食管癌胸腔镜及腹腔镜根治性切除术学习曲线的研究
BMC Surg. 2025 Mar 21;25(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02800-4.
2
Short-term outcomes of three- and two-field lymphadenectomy with minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matching analysis.食管癌微创食管切除术三野和二野淋巴结清扫的短期结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Transl Cancer Res. 2024 Jul 31;13(7):3437-3445. doi: 10.21037/tcr-23-2356. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
3
Effect of cervical paraesophageal lymph node metastasis versus supraclavicular lymph node metastasis on the overall survival of patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: an observational study.

本文引用的文献

1
Patterns of Recurrence and Long-Term Survival of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.新辅助化疗治疗局部晚期食管癌行微创与开放食管切除术的复发模式和长期生存比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jun;27(6):1055-1065. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05615-x. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
2
The evolving landscape of thoracic surgical oncology.胸外科肿瘤学的发展格局。
J Surg Oncol. 2023 Feb;127(2):217-220. doi: 10.1002/jso.27174.
3
Lymph Node Dissection for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
颈段食管旁淋巴结转移与锁骨上淋巴结转移对胸段食管鳞状细胞癌患者总生存期的影响:一项观察性研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Mar 18;86(5):2518-2523. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001955. eCollection 2024 May.
食管鳞癌的淋巴结清扫。
Thorac Surg Clin. 2022 Nov;32(4):497-510. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2022.07.001.
4
Two- versus three-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of early and late results.食管癌二野与三野淋巴结清扫术:早期和晚期结果的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2022 Jul;126(1):76-89. doi: 10.1002/jso.26857.
5
Clinical significance and outcomes of bilateral and unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A large-scale retrospective cohort study.临床意义和结果的双侧和单侧喉返神经淋巴结清扫术在食管鳞癌:一个大规模的回顾性队列研究。
Cancer Med. 2022 Apr;11(7):1617-1629. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4399. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
6
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
7
Esophagectomy With Three-Field Versus Two-Field Lymphadenectomy for Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: Long-Term Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trial.胸中段和胸下段食管癌行三野与二野淋巴结清扫根治术的比较:一项随机临床试验的长期结果。
J Thorac Oncol. 2021 Feb;16(2):310-317. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.10.157. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
8
Three-Field Lymphadenectomy in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma.微创食管癌根治术中的三野淋巴结清扫术。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Sep;112(3):928-934. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.09.022. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
9
Lymph node metastatic patterns and its clinical significance for thoracic superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.胸段浅表性食管鳞癌淋巴结转移规律及其临床意义。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Sep 21;15(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01302-z.
10
Current Issues in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.微创食管切除术的当前问题
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Aug 5;53(4):152-159. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2020.53.4.152.