• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用情感指导决策:情感强度预测的准确性与感知价值

Using emotion to guide decisions: the accuracy and perceived value of emotional intensity forecasts.

作者信息

Carlson Steven J, Levine Linda J, Lench Heather C, Flynn Elinor, Winks Kaitlin M H, Winckler Britanny E

机构信息

Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, USA.

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA.

出版信息

Motiv Emot. 2023 Mar 30:1-19. doi: 10.1007/s11031-023-10007-4.

DOI:10.1007/s11031-023-10007-4
PMID:37359244
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10062255/
Abstract

Forecasts about future emotion are often inaccurate, so why do people rely on them to make decisions? People may forecast some features of their emotional experience better than others, and they may report relying on forecasts that are more accurate to make decisions. To test this, four studies assessed the features of emotion people reported forecasting to make decisions about their careers, education, politics, and health. In Study 1, graduating medical students reported relying more on forecast emotional intensity than frequency or duration to decide how to rank residency programs as part of the process of being matched with a program. Similarly, participants reported relying more on forecast emotional intensity than frequency or duration to decide which universities to apply to (Study 2), which presidential candidate to vote for (Study 3), and whether to travel as Covid-19 rates declined (Study 4). Studies 1 and 3 also assessed forecasting accuracy. Participants forecast emotional intensity more accurately than frequency or duration. People make better decisions when they can anticipate the future. Thus, people's reports of relying on forecast emotional intensity to guide life-changing decisions, and the greater accuracy of these forecasts, provide important new evidence of the adaptive value of affective forecasts.

摘要

关于未来情绪的预测往往不准确,那么为什么人们还依赖它们来做决策呢?人们对自身情绪体验某些特征的预测可能比其他特征更准确,而且他们可能会报告说依赖更准确的预测来做决策。为了验证这一点,四项研究评估了人们报告的用于职业、教育、政治和健康决策的情绪预测特征。在研究1中,即将毕业的医学生报告说,在作为与某个项目匹配过程的一部分来决定如何对住院医师项目进行排名时,他们更多地依赖预测的情绪强度而非频率或持续时间。同样,参与者在决定申请哪所大学(研究2)、投票给哪位总统候选人(研究3)以及随着新冠疫情感染率下降是否出行(研究4)时,报告称更多地依赖预测的情绪强度而非频率或持续时间。研究1和3还评估了预测准确性。参与者对情绪强度的预测比对频率或持续时间的预测更准确。当人们能够预测未来时,他们能做出更好的决策。因此,人们报告依赖预测的情绪强度来指导改变人生的决策,以及这些预测更高的准确性,为情感预测的适应性价值提供了重要的新证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ae/10062255/8e1383e95f94/11031_2023_10007_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ae/10062255/8e7a38c54910/11031_2023_10007_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ae/10062255/c6d799fae103/11031_2023_10007_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ae/10062255/7d22c676ebd2/11031_2023_10007_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ae/10062255/8e1383e95f94/11031_2023_10007_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ae/10062255/8e7a38c54910/11031_2023_10007_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ae/10062255/c6d799fae103/11031_2023_10007_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ae/10062255/7d22c676ebd2/11031_2023_10007_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ae/10062255/8e1383e95f94/11031_2023_10007_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Using emotion to guide decisions: the accuracy and perceived value of emotional intensity forecasts.运用情感指导决策:情感强度预测的准确性与感知价值
Motiv Emot. 2023 Mar 30:1-19. doi: 10.1007/s11031-023-10007-4.
2
When and why people misestimate future feelings: Identifying strengths and weaknesses in affective forecasting.当且为何时人们会错误估计未来的感受:识别情感预测的优缺点。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 May;116(5):724-742. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000143. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
3
Be optimistic or be cautious? Affective forecasting bias in allocation decisions and its effect.保持乐观还是谨慎?分配决策中的情感预测偏差及其影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 13;13:1026557. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1026557. eCollection 2022.
4
How New Mexico Leveraged a COVID-19 Case Forecasting Model to Preemptively Address the Health Care Needs of the State: Quantitative Analysis.新墨西哥州如何利用新冠疫情预测模型来预先满足该州的医疗保健需求:定量分析
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jun 9;7(6):e27888. doi: 10.2196/27888.
5
Voter emotional responses and voting behaviour in the 2020 US presidential election.2020年美国总统大选中选民的情绪反应与投票行为。
Cogn Emot. 2024 Dec;38(8):1196-1209. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2024.2355572. Epub 2024 May 19.
6
Why don't we learn to accurately forecast feelings? How misremembering our predictions blinds us to past forecasting errors.为什么我们不能学会准确地预测感觉呢?为什么记错我们的预测会使我们对过去的预测错误视而不见。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Nov;139(4):579-89. doi: 10.1037/a0020285.
7
Age differences in affective forecasting and experienced emotion surrounding the 2008 US presidential election.2008 年美国总统选举中情感预测和体验情绪的年龄差异。
Cogn Emot. 2011 Sep;25(6):1029-44. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.545543. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
8
Accuracy gains from conservative forecasting: Tests using variations of 19 econometric models to predict 154 elections in 10 countries.保守预测带来的准确性增益:使用 19 个计量经济学模型的变体来预测 10 个国家的 154 次选举。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 10;14(1):e0209850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209850. eCollection 2019.
9
Biden or Trump? Working memory for emotion predicts the ability to forecast future feelings.拜登还是特朗普?情绪工作记忆预测未来感受的能力。
Emotion. 2024 Feb;24(1):139-149. doi: 10.1037/emo0001258. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
10
How well do ordinary Americans forecast the growth of COVID-19?普通美国人对 COVID-19 增长的预测有多准确?
Mem Cognit. 2022 Oct;50(7):1363-1380. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01288-0. Epub 2022 Mar 28.