Sala-Bubaré Anna, Castelló Montserrat, Corcelles Mariona, Suñé-Soler Núria
Universitat Ramon LLull, Barcelona, Spain.
Curr Psychol. 2023 Apr 21:1-9. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04601-5.
This study aims to characterize the strategies researchers used to cope with Covid-19 impact and to explore the relationship between those strategies, researchers' characteristics and the pandemic impact in their lives. 721 researchers, proportionally distributed among three Spanish regions, answered an online survey on the pandemic impact on their activity. Scales referred to social support, productivity, research tasks, working conditions, and work and personal life balance. An open-ended section was included to collect the strategies they used to cope with the pandemic consequences. 1528 strategies were content analysed and categorised based on their purposes and related to the rest of the impact variables. Results show the predominance of some strategies for the whole sample both at the work level, such as organizing work duties and plans, and at the personal level, such as maintaining life-work balance and improving personal well-being. Results stress to what extent a strategic approach contributed to minimize contextual issues or constraints even in an extreme situation as the Covid-19 pandemic and lockdown. A non-strategic approach, consisting of just reacting emotionally or dropping research, was the less effective way to maintain interest in research, sustained work and productivity and to warrant work-life balance. Developing a strategic approach was easier for those without caring responsibilities and for men. Women in our study, especially with caring responsibilities, had reduced opportunities to continue with their careers during the pandemic. No evidence of institutional strategies supporting researchers to cope with the situation was found.
本研究旨在描述研究人员应对新冠疫情影响所采用的策略,并探讨这些策略、研究人员特征与疫情对其生活的影响之间的关系。721名研究人员按比例分布在西班牙的三个地区,他们回答了一项关于疫情对其研究活动影响的在线调查。调查量表涉及社会支持、生产力、研究任务、工作条件以及工作与个人生活平衡等方面。问卷还设有一个开放式问题部分,以收集他们应对疫情后果所采用的策略。对1528条策略进行了内容分析,并根据其目的进行分类,同时将其与其他影响变量相关联。结果显示,在工作层面,如安排工作职责和计划,以及在个人层面,如维持生活与工作的平衡和改善个人幸福感等方面,某些策略在整个样本中占主导地位。结果强调了即使在新冠疫情和封锁这样的极端情况下,一种策略性的方法在多大程度上有助于将背景问题或限制因素降至最低。一种非策略性的方法,即只是情绪化地应对或放弃研究,是维持研究兴趣、持续工作和生产力以及确保工作与生活平衡的效果较差的方式。对于没有照顾责任的人和男性来说,制定策略性方法更容易。在我们的研究中,女性,尤其是有照顾责任的女性,在疫情期间继续从事其职业的机会减少。未发现有机构采取策略支持研究人员应对这种情况的证据。