• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究人员应对新冠疫情对其活动造成影响的策略。

Researchers' strategies to cope with the covid-19 impact on their activity.

作者信息

Sala-Bubaré Anna, Castelló Montserrat, Corcelles Mariona, Suñé-Soler Núria

机构信息

Universitat Ramon LLull, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Curr Psychol. 2023 Apr 21:1-9. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04601-5.

DOI:10.1007/s12144-023-04601-5
PMID:37359685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10119531/
Abstract

This study aims to characterize the strategies researchers used to cope with Covid-19 impact and to explore the relationship between those strategies, researchers' characteristics and the pandemic impact in their lives. 721 researchers, proportionally distributed among three Spanish regions, answered an online survey on the pandemic impact on their activity. Scales referred to social support, productivity, research tasks, working conditions, and work and personal life balance. An open-ended section was included to collect the strategies they used to cope with the pandemic consequences. 1528 strategies were content analysed and categorised based on their purposes and related to the rest of the impact variables. Results show the predominance of some strategies for the whole sample both at the work level, such as organizing work duties and plans, and at the personal level, such as maintaining life-work balance and improving personal well-being. Results stress to what extent a strategic approach contributed to minimize contextual issues or constraints even in an extreme situation as the Covid-19 pandemic and lockdown. A non-strategic approach, consisting of just reacting emotionally or dropping research, was the less effective way to maintain interest in research, sustained work and productivity and to warrant work-life balance. Developing a strategic approach was easier for those without caring responsibilities and for men. Women in our study, especially with caring responsibilities, had reduced opportunities to continue with their careers during the pandemic. No evidence of institutional strategies supporting researchers to cope with the situation was found.

摘要

本研究旨在描述研究人员应对新冠疫情影响所采用的策略,并探讨这些策略、研究人员特征与疫情对其生活的影响之间的关系。721名研究人员按比例分布在西班牙的三个地区,他们回答了一项关于疫情对其研究活动影响的在线调查。调查量表涉及社会支持、生产力、研究任务、工作条件以及工作与个人生活平衡等方面。问卷还设有一个开放式问题部分,以收集他们应对疫情后果所采用的策略。对1528条策略进行了内容分析,并根据其目的进行分类,同时将其与其他影响变量相关联。结果显示,在工作层面,如安排工作职责和计划,以及在个人层面,如维持生活与工作的平衡和改善个人幸福感等方面,某些策略在整个样本中占主导地位。结果强调了即使在新冠疫情和封锁这样的极端情况下,一种策略性的方法在多大程度上有助于将背景问题或限制因素降至最低。一种非策略性的方法,即只是情绪化地应对或放弃研究,是维持研究兴趣、持续工作和生产力以及确保工作与生活平衡的效果较差的方式。对于没有照顾责任的人和男性来说,制定策略性方法更容易。在我们的研究中,女性,尤其是有照顾责任的女性,在疫情期间继续从事其职业的机会减少。未发现有机构采取策略支持研究人员应对这种情况的证据。

相似文献

1
Researchers' strategies to cope with the covid-19 impact on their activity.研究人员应对新冠疫情对其活动造成影响的策略。
Curr Psychol. 2023 Apr 21:1-9. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04601-5.
2
Pandemic-Related Challenges and Organizational Support Among Personnel in Canada's Defense Establishment.加拿大国防机构人员在大流行期间面临的挑战和组织支持。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 27;9:789912. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.789912. eCollection 2021.
3
Patient experiences of fertility clinic closure during the COVID-19 pandemic: appraisals, coping and emotions.患者在 COVID-19 大流行期间对生育诊所关闭的体验:评估、应对和情绪。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Nov 1;35(11):2556-2566. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa218.
4
Learning from lockdown - Assessing the positive and negative experiences, and coping strategies of researchers during the COVID-19 pandemic.从封锁中学习——评估新冠疫情期间研究人员的积极与消极经历及应对策略
Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2021 Mar;236:105269. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105269. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
5
Return-to-work, disabilities and occupational health in the age of COVID-19.新冠疫情时代的重返工作岗位、残疾与职业健康。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021 Jul 1;47(5):408-409. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3960. Epub 2021 May 18.
6
Social Researchers' Approaches to Research Ethics During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Study.社会研究人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间的研究伦理方法:一项探索性研究。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Feb-Apr;17(1-2):213-222. doi: 10.1177/15562646211055056. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
7
Coping strategies used by nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative literature review.新冠疫情期间护士所采用的应对策略:一项叙述性文献综述
Health SA. 2021 Sep 28;26:1652. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v26i0.1652. eCollection 2021.
8
Understanding Coping Mechanisms during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Case Study of Stakeholders of the African Sisters Education Collaborative.了解新冠疫情期间的应对机制:以非洲姐妹教育协作组织利益相关者为例的研究
Rev Relig Res. 2022;64(2):325-342. doi: 10.1007/s13644-022-00488-z. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
9
The COVID-19 Pandemic Experience in Multiple Sclerosis: The Good, the Bad and the Neutral.多发性硬化症患者的新冠疫情经历:好的、坏的与中性的方面
Neurol Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):279-291. doi: 10.1007/s40120-021-00241-8. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
10
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责