Kite Rich J, Noon Mark R, Morris Rhys, Mundy Peter, Clarke Neil D
Academy Sports Science and Medical Department, Coventry City Football Club, Coventry, UK.
Centre for Sport, Exercise and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
J Sci Sport Exerc. 2023 Mar 8:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s42978-023-00222-3.
The present study engaged in an ethnographical observation of the processes used to determine player (de)selections within a professional academy. English category-2 youth academy players ( = 96) from U10-U16 age groups undertook anthropometric profiling (height, mass and somatic maturation) and fitness assessments (10 m, 20 m & 30 m linear sprints, 505-agility test, countermovement and squat jumps). Each players lead coach ( = 4) subjectively graded players utilising a red, amber and green (RAG) rating system on a weekly (current performance) and quarterly (perceived potential) basis, across 25 weeks. A MANCOVA, controlling for maturation, was applied to determine differences in (de)selection by physical performance. Mann Whitney- tests were used to distinguish difference in (de)selection by subjective grading (weekly and quarterly). The key finding was that quarterly subjective gradings established a higher cumulative score of green ratings in selected players and a low cumulative score of red ratings, and vice versa for deselected players ( ≤ 0.001 to 0.03). However, whilst these findings suggest that quarterly subjective grades of potential were able to provide the best predictors for player (de)selection, the findings should be viewed with caution due to high potential for confirmatory bias.
本研究对一家职业青训学院内确定球员入选(或落选)的过程进行了人种志观察。来自U10-U16年龄组的96名英格兰二级青年青训学院球员接受了人体测量(身高、体重和身体成熟度)和体能评估(10米、20米和30米直线短跑、505敏捷性测试、反向移动和深蹲跳)。每位球员的主教练(共4人)在25周的时间里,每周(根据当前表现)和每季度(根据潜在能力)使用红、黄、绿(RAG)评级系统对球员进行主观评分。运用控制成熟度的多变量协方差分析来确定身体表现方面入选(或落选)的差异。使用曼-惠特尼U检验来区分主观评分(每周和每季度)在入选(或落选)方面的差异。关键发现是,每季度的主观评分显示,入选球员的绿色评级累积得分较高,红色评级累积得分较低,落选球员则相反(≤0.001至0.03)。然而,尽管这些发现表明每季度的潜在能力主观评分能够为球员入选(或落选)提供最佳预测指标,但由于存在较高的确认性偏差可能性,这些发现应谨慎看待。