• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于书面汉语中辖域刚性的实验研究。

An experimental investigation into scope rigidity in written Mandarin.

作者信息

Wu Hongchen

机构信息

School of Modern Languages, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 9;14:1128616. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128616. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128616
PMID:37359873
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10289302/
Abstract

Mandarin Chinese is claimed to be a scope-rigid language, as its doubly-quantified simple transitive sentences are unambiguous with surface scope only and no inverse scope available. However, it has been debated whether Mandarin Chinese allows inverse scope in some syntactic environments other than simple transitives. This paper investigates whether scope rigidity as a property of the grammar of Mandarin prevents scope ambiguity in different syntactic environments and what factors influence scope interpretations. Using a Truth-Value Judgment task, we tested the judgments of 98 Mandarin Chinese native speakers on transitive sentences containing both a subject and object quantifier under adverbial clauses. The results show that inverse scope reading is considered available for doubly-quantified transitives under adverbial clauses, although there are intra-participant variances. The results challenge the well-established approaches to quantifier scope in Mandarin and call for rethinking the long-standing dichotomy view of quantifier scope in languages. We also found bimodal distribution on the acceptance of inverse scope readings, suggesting that there may be two different populations of native speakers with two different grammars. In addition, we also observed other factors that may affect scope behaviors, including clause type, presence of aspect marker, verb type, and numbers.

摘要

普通话被认为是一种辖域严格的语言,因为其双重量化的简单及物句子仅在表面辖域上是明确的,不存在反向辖域。然而,普通话在简单及物句之外的某些句法环境中是否允许反向辖域一直存在争议。本文研究普通话语法中的辖域严格性是否会在不同句法环境中防止辖域歧义,以及哪些因素会影响辖域解释。我们使用真值判断任务,测试了98名以普通话为母语的人对状语从句下包含主语和宾语量词的及物句子的判断。结果表明,尽管存在个体差异,但状语从句下双重量化的及物动词被认为可以有反向辖域解读。这些结果挑战了普通话中关于量词辖域的既定研究方法,并呼吁重新思考语言中量词辖域的长期二分法观点。我们还发现了反向辖域解读接受度的双峰分布,这表明可能存在两类具有不同语法的母语者群体。此外,我们还观察到了其他可能影响辖域行为的因素,包括从句类型、体标记的存在、动词类型和数量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a484/10289302/8ac797be61bc/fpsyg-14-1128616-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a484/10289302/063409978b18/fpsyg-14-1128616-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a484/10289302/2d814fd2689c/fpsyg-14-1128616-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a484/10289302/353fa5711fd5/fpsyg-14-1128616-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a484/10289302/65d542d7865e/fpsyg-14-1128616-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a484/10289302/b37c7a2d21b6/fpsyg-14-1128616-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a484/10289302/ad9d660632cf/fpsyg-14-1128616-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a484/10289302/8ac797be61bc/fpsyg-14-1128616-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a484/10289302/063409978b18/fpsyg-14-1128616-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a484/10289302/2d814fd2689c/fpsyg-14-1128616-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a484/10289302/353fa5711fd5/fpsyg-14-1128616-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a484/10289302/65d542d7865e/fpsyg-14-1128616-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a484/10289302/b37c7a2d21b6/fpsyg-14-1128616-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a484/10289302/ad9d660632cf/fpsyg-14-1128616-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a484/10289302/8ac797be61bc/fpsyg-14-1128616-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
An experimental investigation into scope rigidity in written Mandarin.关于书面汉语中辖域刚性的实验研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 9;14:1128616. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128616. eCollection 2023.
2
The Interpretation of Disjunction in the Scope of in Child Mandarin.儿童普通话中“或”辖域内析取的解读
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 15;11:609492. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.609492. eCollection 2020.
3
Scope processing in Chinese.中文中的范围处理。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2009 Feb;38(1):11-24. doi: 10.1007/s10936-008-9079-x. Epub 2008 Jun 3.
4
Lexical Disambiguation in Verb Learning: Evidence from the Conjoined-Subject Intransitive Frame in English and Mandarin Chinese.动词学习中的词汇歧义消解:来自英语和汉语连主不及物结构的证据
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 16;7:138. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00138. eCollection 2016.
5
Psycholinguistic Evidence for Inverse Scope in Korean.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Aug;45(4):871-82. doi: 10.1007/s10936-015-9380-4.
6
Processing covert dependency: An eye-tracking study of scope interpretations of embedded Wh-questions in Mandarin.隐性依存关系加工:汉语嵌入式 Wh-疑问句辖域解读的眼动研究。
PLoS One. 2023 May 18;18(5):e0285873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285873. eCollection 2023.
7
Deconstructing the Native Speaker: Further Evidence From Heritage Speakers for Why This Horse Should Be Dead!解构母语者:来自母语传承者的进一步证据,证明这匹马为何应该被淘汰!
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 5;12:717352. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717352. eCollection 2021.
8
Ambiguity in the processing of Mandarin Chinese relative clauses: One factor cannot explain it all.汉语关系从句加工中的歧义性:一个因素无法解释全部情况。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 8;12(6):e0178369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178369. eCollection 2017.
9
Children's knowledge of ellipsis constructions in Mandarin Chinese.儿童对汉语省略结构的认识。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2014 Aug;43(4):421-45. doi: 10.1007/s10936-013-9262-6.
10
Differences in Scope Assignments for Child and Adult Speakers of Mandarin.普通话儿童和成人说话者在辖域分配上的差异。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2018 Dec;47(6):1219-1241. doi: 10.1007/s10936-018-9557-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Processing and domain selection: Quantificational variability effects.处理与领域选择:量化变异性效应
Lang Cogn Process. 2013;28(10):1519-1544. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2012.679663.
2
Scope processing in Chinese.中文中的范围处理。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2009 Feb;38(1):11-24. doi: 10.1007/s10936-008-9079-x. Epub 2008 Jun 3.