• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

装配式制作:结构化制作如何成为创造力和工程设计的入门途径。

Assembly-style making: How structured making serves as an on-ramp to creativity and engineering design.

作者信息

Lukowski Sarah, Goeke Megan, Schmit Bette, Bequette Marjorie

机构信息

Science Museum of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 9;14:1120186. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1120186. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1120186
PMID:37359889
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10289551/
Abstract

Makerspaces, workspaces where families can explore materials and tools collaboratively, can provide an opportunity for creative expression and early engineering learning in community spaces. The present study examined a cardboard-focused museum makerspace that included an assembly-style activity. Assembly-style making uses instructions to support makers. Such activities have been critiqued as limiting creativity and engineering thinking. However, makers who are less comfortable in makerspaces may benefit from assembly-style activities helping to scaffold their entry into the space. We explored these criticisms and potential benefits of assembly-style making through developing case studies of video data taken by families in a makerspace. Visitors made creative and personally meaningful creations when engaged in assembly style making. Moreover, assembly-style making mediated a family less comfortable with making to get started in the space alongside ample evidence of families following engineering design processes. Contrary to popular belief, assembly-style making offers an important support to novice makers, without eliminating creativity and engineering design processes, and should be considered in the mix of activities available in makerspaces to support makers of all levels of comfort in making.

摘要

创客空间是家庭可以协作探索材料和工具的工作空间,它能为社区空间中的创意表达和早期工程学习提供机会。本研究考察了一个以纸板为重点的博物馆创客空间,其中包括一项组装式活动。组装式制作利用说明来支持创客。此类活动被批评为限制了创造力和工程思维。然而,在创客空间中不太自在的创客可能会受益于组装式活动,这些活动有助于搭建他们进入该空间的桥梁。我们通过对家庭在创客空间拍摄的视频数据进行案例研究,探讨了组装式制作的这些批评意见和潜在益处。参观者在参与组装式制作时创造出了富有创意且对个人有意义的作品。此外,组装式制作帮助不太习惯制作的家庭在该空间开始制作,同时有充分证据表明家庭遵循了工程设计流程。与普遍看法相反,组装式制作在不消除创造力和工程设计流程的情况下,为新手创客提供了重要支持,在创客空间提供的各类活动组合中应考虑纳入此类活动,以支持不同制作舒适度水平的创客。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d15/10289551/2674a28c7417/fpsyg-14-1120186-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d15/10289551/af6a524b765b/fpsyg-14-1120186-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d15/10289551/63935a9a3443/fpsyg-14-1120186-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d15/10289551/14921b8134f7/fpsyg-14-1120186-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d15/10289551/2674a28c7417/fpsyg-14-1120186-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d15/10289551/af6a524b765b/fpsyg-14-1120186-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d15/10289551/63935a9a3443/fpsyg-14-1120186-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d15/10289551/14921b8134f7/fpsyg-14-1120186-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d15/10289551/2674a28c7417/fpsyg-14-1120186-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Assembly-style making: How structured making serves as an on-ramp to creativity and engineering design.装配式制作:结构化制作如何成为创造力和工程设计的入门途径。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 9;14:1120186. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1120186. eCollection 2023.
2
How do you play that makerspace game? An ethnographic exploration of the habitus of engineering makerspaces.你如何玩那个创客空间游戏?对工程创客空间惯习的人种志探索。
Res Eng Des. 2022;33(4):351-366. doi: 10.1007/s00163-022-00393-0. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
3
Activities and Experiences of Children and Makerspace Coaches During After-School and School Programs in a Public Library Makerspace.公立图书馆创客空间课后及校内项目中儿童与创客空间教练的活动与经历。
J STEM Educ Res. 2022;5(2):163-186. doi: 10.1007/s41979-022-00070-w. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
4
Comparative analysis of ventilation efficiency on ultrafine particle removal in university MakerSpaces.大学创客空间中关于超细颗粒物去除的通风效率比较分析。
Atmos Environ (1994). 2020 Mar 1;224. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117321. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
5
Studying the Formation of an Older Adult-Led Makerspace.研究由老年人主导的创客空间的形成。
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2021;593:1-11. doi: 10.1145/3411764.3445146.
6
Sustaining the Usefulness and Appeal of an Older Adult-led Makerspace through Developing and Adapting Resources.通过开发和调整资源来维持由老年人主导的创客空间的实用性和吸引力。
Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2024;8:1-29.
7
The influence of supervisor creative feedback environment on team creativity: The role of the ambidextrous learning and creative cognitive style.主管创造性反馈环境对团队创造力的影响:兼具适应性与创新性学习及创造性认知风格的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 28;13:1007947. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1007947. eCollection 2022.
8
The show must go on! Strategies for making and makerspaces during pandemic.演出必须继续!疫情期间制作和创客空间的策略。
Int J Child Comput Interact. 2021 Sep;29:100303. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100303. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
9
Brainstorming variants to favor creative design.集思广益,寻找有利于创意设计的变体。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Feb;83:102987. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102987. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
10
Learning from the parallel pathways of Makers to broaden pathways to engineering.借鉴创客的平行路径,拓宽通往工程学的路径。
Int J STEM Educ. 2018;5(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40594-017-0098-8. Epub 2018 Mar 2.

本文引用的文献

1
'One size doesn't fit all': Lessons from interaction analysis on tailoring Open Science practices to qualitative research.“一刀切”不适用:从互动分析中学到的将开放科学实践定制到定性研究中的经验。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Oct;62(4):1590-1604. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12568. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
2
Tinkering With Testing: Understanding How Museum Program Design Advances Engineering Learning Opportunities for Children.探索测试:理解博物馆项目设计如何为儿童拓展工程学习机会
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 8;12:689425. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689425. eCollection 2021.
3
The use of triangulation in qualitative research.
三角互证法在定性研究中的应用。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014 Sep;41(5):545-7. doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.545-547.
4
The double-edged sword of pedagogy: Instruction limits spontaneous exploration and discovery.教育学的双刃剑:教学限制了自发的探索和发现。
Cognition. 2011 Sep;120(3):322-30. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.001. Epub 2011 Jan 8.
5
Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction.是否应该对纯粹的发现式学习实施“三振出局”规则?支持指导性教学方法的理由。
Am Psychol. 2004 Jan;59(1):14-9. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14.