• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过后验预测检验评估多重填补模型的图形和数值诊断工具。

Graphical and numerical diagnostic tools to assess multiple imputation models by posterior predictive checking.

作者信息

Cai Mingyang, van Buuren Stef, Vink Gerko

机构信息

Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Jun 13;9(6):e17077. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17077. eCollection 2023 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17077
PMID:37360073
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10285146/
Abstract

PROBLEM

The congenial of the imputation model is crucial for valid statistical inferences. Hence, it is important to develop methodologies for diagnosing imputation models.

AIM

We propose and evaluate a new diagnostic method based on posterior predictive checking to diagnose the congeniality of fully conditional imputation models. Our method applies to multiple imputation by chained equations, which is widely used in statistical software.

METHODS

The proposed method compares the observed data with their replicates generated under the corresponding posterior predictive distributions to diagnose the performance of imputation models. The method applies to various imputation models, including parametric and semi-parametric approaches and continuous and discrete incomplete variables. We studied the validity of the method through simulation and application.

RESULTS

The proposed diagnostic method based on posterior predictive checking demonstrates its validity in assessing the performance of imputation models. The method can diagnose the consistency of imputation models with the substantive model and can be applied to a broad range of research contexts.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic method based on posterior predictive checking provides a valuable tool for researchers who use fully conditional specification to handle missing data. By assessing the performance of imputation models, our method can help researchers improve the accuracy and reliability of their analyzes. Furthermore, our method applies to different imputation models. Hence, it is a versatile and valuable tool for researchers identifying plausible imputation models.

摘要

问题

归因模型的一致性对于有效的统计推断至关重要。因此,开发用于诊断归因模型的方法很重要。

目的

我们提出并评估一种基于后验预测检验的新诊断方法,以诊断完全条件归因模型的一致性。我们的方法适用于链式方程多重插补,该方法在统计软件中广泛使用。

方法

所提出的方法将观察到的数据与其在相应后验预测分布下生成的重复数据进行比较,以诊断归因模型的性能。该方法适用于各种归因模型,包括参数和半参数方法以及连续和离散的不完全变量。我们通过模拟和应用研究了该方法的有效性。

结果

所提出的基于后验预测检验的诊断方法在评估归因模型的性能方面证明了其有效性。该方法可以诊断归因模型与实质模型的一致性,并且可以应用于广泛的研究背景。

结论

基于后验预测检验的诊断方法为使用完全条件规范处理缺失数据的研究人员提供了一个有价值的工具。通过评估归因模型的性能,我们的方法可以帮助研究人员提高其分析的准确性和可靠性。此外,我们的方法适用于不同的归因模型。因此,它是研究人员识别合理归因模型的一种通用且有价值的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/11f63498cbfb/gr013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/5a2eb20bcecc/gr001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/9c8f0dd66670/fx001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/84fe6b507a4c/fx002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/51855a004a40/gr002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/66a988a3ccfa/gr003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/c2ddfe096d6f/gr004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/e3b4e0830532/gr005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/7af667538be5/gr006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/0c06d4fe57bb/gr007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/8b47b78332e5/gr008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/8fffd004aa85/gr009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/1ce9262adaa9/gr010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/bafc7498d6a5/gr011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/fdf662de604a/gr012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/11f63498cbfb/gr013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/5a2eb20bcecc/gr001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/9c8f0dd66670/fx001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/84fe6b507a4c/fx002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/51855a004a40/gr002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/66a988a3ccfa/gr003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/c2ddfe096d6f/gr004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/e3b4e0830532/gr005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/7af667538be5/gr006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/0c06d4fe57bb/gr007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/8b47b78332e5/gr008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/8fffd004aa85/gr009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/1ce9262adaa9/gr010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/bafc7498d6a5/gr011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/fdf662de604a/gr012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bc/10285146/11f63498cbfb/gr013.jpg

相似文献

1
Graphical and numerical diagnostic tools to assess multiple imputation models by posterior predictive checking.通过后验预测检验评估多重填补模型的图形和数值诊断工具。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 13;9(6):e17077. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17077. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Posterior predictive checking of multiple imputation models.多重填补模型的后验预测检验
Biom J. 2015 Jul;57(4):676-94. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201400034. Epub 2015 May 3.
3
Model checking in multiple imputation: an overview and case study.多重填补中的模型检验:综述与案例研究
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2017 Aug 23;14:8. doi: 10.1186/s12982-017-0062-6. eCollection 2017.
4
Graphical and numerical diagnostic tools to assess suitability of multiple imputations and imputation models.用于评估多重填补及填补模型适用性的图形和数值诊断工具。
Stat Med. 2016 Jul 30;35(17):3007-20. doi: 10.1002/sim.6926. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
5
Diagnosing imputation models by applying target analyses to posterior replicates of completed data.通过对已完成数据的后验重复进行目标分析来诊断插补模型。
Stat Med. 2012 Jan 13;31(1):1-18. doi: 10.1002/sim.4413. Epub 2011 Dec 4.
6
Multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in a longitudinal categorical variable with restrictions on transitions over time: a simulation study.多种插补方法处理具有时间过渡限制的纵向分类变量中的缺失值:一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jan 10;19(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0653-0.
7
Non-parametric approach for frequentist multiple imputation in survival analysis with missing covariates.生存分析中缺失协变量时用于频率学派多重填补的非参数方法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Jul;30(7):1691-1707. doi: 10.1177/09622802211011197. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
8
Multiple imputation for missing data via sequential regression trees.基于序贯回归树的缺失数据多重插补法。
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Nov 1;172(9):1070-6. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq260. Epub 2010 Sep 14.
9
Relative efficiency of joint-model and full-conditional-specification multiple imputation when conditional models are compatible: The general location model.在条件模型兼容时,联合模型和全条件指定多重插补的相对效率:广义位置模型。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Jun;27(6):1603-1614. doi: 10.1177/0962280216665872. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
10
Multiple imputation for handling missing outcome data when estimating the relative risk.采用多重插补处理估计相对危险度时丢失的结局数据。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Sep 6;17(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0414-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Handling missing predictor values when validating and applying a prediction model to new patients.在验证预测模型并将其应用于新患者时处理预测变量的缺失值。
Stat Med. 2020 Nov 10;39(25):3591-3607. doi: 10.1002/sim.8682. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
2
Bootstrap inference for multiple imputation under uncongeniality and misspecification.在不相容性和错误设定下多重填补的自助法推断
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Dec;29(12):3533-3546. doi: 10.1177/0962280220932189. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
3
Graphical and numerical diagnostic tools to assess suitability of multiple imputations and imputation models.
用于评估多重填补及填补模型适用性的图形和数值诊断工具。
Stat Med. 2016 Jul 30;35(17):3007-20. doi: 10.1002/sim.6926. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
4
Posterior predictive checking of multiple imputation models.多重填补模型的后验预测检验
Biom J. 2015 Jul;57(4):676-94. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201400034. Epub 2015 May 3.
5
Multiple imputation of covariates by fully conditional specification: Accommodating the substantive model.通过完全条件设定对协变量进行多重填补:适配实质性模型。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2015 Aug;24(4):462-87. doi: 10.1177/0962280214521348. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
6
Diagnosing imputation models by applying target analyses to posterior replicates of completed data.通过对已完成数据的后验重复进行目标分析来诊断插补模型。
Stat Med. 2012 Jan 13;31(1):1-18. doi: 10.1002/sim.4413. Epub 2011 Dec 4.
7
Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice.使用链式方程进行多重插补:实践中的问题和指导。
Stat Med. 2011 Feb 20;30(4):377-99. doi: 10.1002/sim.4067. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
8
Self-reported and measured weight, height and body mass index (BMI) in Italy, the Netherlands and North America.意大利、荷兰和北美的自我报告体重、身高和身体质量指数(BMI)。
Eur J Public Health. 2011 Aug;21(4):414-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp228. Epub 2010 Jan 20.
9
Multiple imputation using an iterative hot-deck with distance-based donor selection.使用基于距离的供体选择的迭代热插补法进行多重填补。
Stat Med. 2008 Jan 15;27(1):83-102. doi: 10.1002/sim.3001.
10
Evaluation of software for multiple imputation of semi-continuous data.半连续数据多重填补软件的评估
Stat Methods Med Res. 2007 Jun;16(3):243-58. doi: 10.1177/0962280206074464.