Cowen Nick, Schliesser Eric
School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Public Choice. 2023 Jun 8:1-22. doi: 10.1007/s11127-023-01072-x.
Novel externalities are social activities for which the emerging cost (or benefit) of the spillover is unknown and must be discovered. Negative novel externalities have regained international salience following the COVID-19 pandemic. Such cases frequently are invoked as evidence of the limits of liberal political economy for dealing with public emergencies. Through a re-reading of classical political economy with the modern state's confrontation with infectious disease in mind, we defend the comparative efficacy of liberal democracy against authoritarian alternatives for coping with these social problems. Effective responses to novel externalities require producing and updating trustworthy public information and an independent scientific community to validate and interpret it. Those epistemic capacities are prevalent in liberal democratic regimes with multiple sources of political power, an independent civil society, and practices of academic freedom. Our analysis highlights the theoretical value of polycentrism and self-governance beyond their more familiar role, of increasing accountability and competition in the provision of local public goods, towards facilitating effective national policy.
新出现的外部性是指那些溢出效应所产生的成本(或收益)未知且有待发现的社会活动。自新冠疫情以来,负面的新出现的外部性再次引起国际关注。此类情况常被援引作为自由政治经济在应对公共紧急情况方面存在局限性的证据。通过带着现代国家应对传染病的情况重新审视古典政治经济学,我们捍卫自由民主制相对于威权替代方案在应对这些社会问题上的比较有效性。有效应对新出现的外部性需要生成并更新可靠的公共信息,以及一个独立的科学界来验证和解读这些信息。这些认知能力在具有多种政治权力来源、独立公民社会和学术自由实践的自由民主政权中普遍存在。我们的分析凸显了多中心主义和自我治理的理论价值,这超出了它们在增加地方公共物品提供方面的问责制和竞争这一更为人熟知的作用,朝着促进有效的国家政策发展。