Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Department of Family and Community Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
J Nutr. 2023 Aug;153(8):2432-2441. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.06.032. Epub 2023 Jun 25.
A poor diet can result from adverse social determinants of health and increases the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
We aimed to assess, using data from the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be prospective cohort, whether nulliparous pregnant individuals who lived in a food desert were more likely to experience poorer periconceptional diet quality compared with those who did not live in a food desert.
The exposure was living in a food desert based on a spatial overview of food access indicators by income and supermarket access per the Food Access Research Atlas. The outcome was periconceptional diet quality per the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2010, analyzed by quartile (Q) from the highest or best (Q4, reference) to the lowest or worst dietary quality (Q1); and secondarily, nonadherence (yes or no) to 12 key aspects of dietary quality.
Among 7,956 assessed individuals, 24.9% lived in a food desert. The mean HEI-2010 score was 61.1 of 100 (SD: 12.5). Poorer periconceptional dietary quality was more common among those who lived in a food desert compared with those who did not live in a food desert (Q4: 19.8%, Q3: 23.6%, Q2: 26.5%, and Q1: 30.0% vs. Q4: 26.8%, Q3: 25.8%, Q2: 24.5%, and Q1: 22.9%; overall P < 0.001). Individuals living in a food desert were more likely to report a diet in lower quartiles of the HEI-2010 (i.e., poorer dietary quality) (aOR: 1.34 per quartile; 95% CI: 1.21, 1.49). They were more likely to be nonadherent to recommended standards for 5 adequacy components of the HEI-2010, including fruit, total vegetables, greens and beans, seafood and plant proteins, and fatty acids, and less likely to report excess intake of empty calories.
Nulliparous pregnant individuals living in a food desert were more likely to experience poorer periconceptional diet quality compared with those who did not live in a food desert.
不良的饮食可能是由不利的健康社会决定因素造成的,并增加了不良妊娠结局的风险。
我们旨在通过 Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes 研究:监测母亲未来前瞻性队列的数据来评估,与不住在食品荒漠的孕妇相比,居住在食品荒漠中的孕妇是否更有可能在围孕期经历较差的饮食质量。
根据食品获取研究地图集按收入和超市获取情况的空间概述,将暴露定义为居住在食品荒漠中。该研究的结局是通过健康饮食指数(HEI)-2010 来评估围孕期的饮食质量,按四分位数(Q)进行分析(从最高或最佳(Q4,参考)到最低或最差饮食质量(Q1);其次,评估 12 个关键饮食质量方面的不依从性(是或否)。
在评估的 7956 名个体中,有 24.9%的人居住在食品荒漠中。HEI-2010 平均得分为 100 分中的 61.1 分(SD:12.5 分)。与不住在食品荒漠的孕妇相比,居住在食品荒漠中的孕妇围孕期的饮食质量更差(Q4:19.8%,Q3:23.6%,Q2:26.5%,Q1:30.0%与 Q4:26.8%,Q3:25.8%,Q2:24.5%,Q1:22.9%;总体 P < 0.001)。居住在食品荒漠中的个体更有可能报告 HEI-2010 的较低四分位数(即较差的饮食质量)(OR:每四分位数 1.34;95%CI:1.21,1.49)。他们更有可能不符合 HEI-2010 中 5 个适宜性成分的推荐标准,包括水果、全蔬菜、绿色蔬菜和豆类、海鲜和植物蛋白以及脂肪酸,而报告摄入过多空卡路里的可能性较小。
与不住在食品荒漠的孕妇相比,居住在食品荒漠中的孕妇在围孕期更有可能经历较差的饮食质量。