Weber Simon, Salomoni Sauro E, Kilpatrick Callum, Hinder Mark R
Sensorimotor Neuroscience and Aging Research Lab, The University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Psychophysiology. 2023 Nov;60(11):e14372. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14372. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
Inhibiting ongoing responses when environmental demands change is a critical component of motor control. Experimentally, the stop signal task (SST) represents the gold standard response inhibition paradigm. However, an emerging body of evidence suggests that the SST conflates two dissociable sources of inhibition, namely an involuntarily pause associated with attentional capture and the (subsequent) voluntary cancellation of action. The extent to which these processes also occur in other response tasks is unknown. Younger n = 24 (20-35 years) and older n = 23 (60-85 years) adults completed tasks involving rapid unimanual or bimanual responses to visual stimuli. A subset of trials required cancellation of one component of an initial bimanual response (i.e., selective stop task; stop left response, continue right response) or enacting an additional response (e.g., press left button as well as right button). Critically, both tasks involved some infrequent stimuli baring no behavioral imperative (i.e., they had to be ignored). EMG recordings of voluntary responses during stopping tasks revealed bimanual covert responses (muscle activation, which was suppressed before a button press ensued), consistent with a pause process, following both stop and ignore stimuli, before the required response was subsequently enacted. Critically, we also observed the behavioral consequences of a similar involuntary pause in trials where action cancellation was not part of the response set. Notably, the period over which movements were susceptible to response delays from additional stimuli was longer for older adults than younger adults. The findings demonstrate that an involuntary attentional component of inhibition significantly contributes to action cancellation processes.
当环境需求发生变化时抑制持续的反应是运动控制的关键组成部分。在实验中,停止信号任务(SST)代表了反应抑制范式的黄金标准。然而,越来越多的证据表明,SST混淆了两种可分离的抑制源,即与注意力捕获相关的非自愿暂停和(随后的)自愿行动取消。这些过程在其他反应任务中也发生的程度尚不清楚。较年轻的n = 24(20 - 35岁)和较年长的n = 23(60 - 85岁)成年人完成了涉及对视觉刺激进行快速单手或双手反应的任务。一部分试验要求取消初始双手反应的一个组成部分(即选择性停止任务;停止左手反应,继续右手反应)或做出额外的反应(例如,同时按下左键和右键)。至关重要的是,这两个任务都涉及一些不常出现且没有行为要求的刺激(即必须忽略它们)。在停止任务期间对自愿反应的肌电图记录显示,在停止和忽略刺激后,在随后做出所需反应之前,存在双手隐蔽反应(肌肉激活,在随后按下按钮之前被抑制),这与暂停过程一致。至关重要的是,我们还在动作取消不是反应设定一部分的试验中观察到了类似非自愿暂停的行为后果。值得注意的是,老年人比年轻人更容易受到额外刺激导致反应延迟影响的运动时间段更长。研究结果表明,抑制的非自愿注意力成分对动作取消过程有显著贡献。