Suppr超能文献

是否检测?Xpert MTB/RIF 替代痰涂片显微镜检查,指导耐药结核病线探针检测试验。

To Test or Not? Xpert MTB/RIF as an Alternative to Smear Microscopy to Guide Line Probe Assay Testing for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis.

机构信息

DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa.

National Health Laboratory Services, Green Point, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2023 Jul 20;61(7):e0001723. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00017-23. Epub 2023 Jun 27.

Abstract

Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) revolutionized tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis. Laboratory decision making on whether widely-used reflex drug susceptibility assays (MTBDR, first-line resistance; MTBDR, second-line) are conducted is based on smear status, with smear-negative specimens often excluded. We performed receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses using bacterial load information (smear microscopy grade, Xpert-generated semi-quantitation categories and minimum cycle threshold [C] values) from Xpert rifampicin-resistant sputum for the prediction of downstream line probe assay results as "likely non-actionable" (no resistance or susceptible results generated). We evaluated actionable-to-non-actionable result ratios and pay-offs with missed resistance versus LPAs done universally. Smear-negatives were more likely than smear-positive specimens to generate a non-actionable MTBDR (23% [133/559] versus 4% [15/381]) or MTBDR (39% [220/559] versus 12% [47/381]) result. However, excluding smear-negatives would result in missed rapid diagnoses (e.g., only 49% [264/537] of LPA-diagnosable isoniazid resistance would be detected if smear-negatives were omitted). Testing smear-negatives with a semi-quantitation category ≥ "medium" had a high ratio of actionable-to-non-actionable results (12.8 or a 4-fold improvement versus testing all using MTBDR 4.5 or 3-fold improvement for MTBDR), which would still capture 64% (168/264) and 77% (34/44) of LPA-detectable smear-negative resistance, respectively. Use of Cs permitted optimization of this ratio with higher specificity for non-actionable results but decreased resistance detected. Xpert quantitative information permits identification of a smear-negative subset in whom the payoffs of the ratio of actionable-to-non-actionable LPA results with missed resistance may prove acceptable to laboratories, depending on context. Our findings permit the rational expansion of direct DST to certain smear-negative sputum specimens.

摘要

Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) 彻底改变了结核病 (TB) 的诊断方式。实验室是否进行广泛使用的药敏检测(MTBDR,一线耐药;MTBDR,二线)的决策取决于涂片状态,通常排除涂片阴性的标本。我们使用 Xpert 利福平耐药痰中的细菌负荷信息(涂片显微镜分级、Xpert 生成的半定量分类和最小循环阈值 [C] 值)进行了接收者操作特征 (ROC) 曲线分析,以预测下游线探针检测结果为“可能不可操作”(无耐药或敏感结果生成)。我们评估了漏检耐药时,采用与普遍进行 LPAs 相比,将其作为不可操作的结果的比例和收益。与涂片阳性标本相比,涂片阴性标本更有可能产生不可操作的 MTBDR(23% [133/559] 与 4% [15/381])或 MTBDR(39% [220/559] 与 12% [47/381])结果。然而,排除涂片阴性标本将导致快速诊断漏检(例如,如果排除涂片阴性标本,只有 49% [264/537] 的 LPA 可诊断的异烟肼耐药性会被检出)。使用半定量分类≥“中”的检测涂片阴性标本,其可操作与不可操作结果的比例较高(12.8 或 4 倍优于使用 MTBDR 4.5 的检测,或 3 倍优于 MTBDR 的检测),这仍将分别捕获 64%(168/264)和 77%(34/44)的 LPA 可检出的涂片阴性耐药性。使用 Cs 可以优化该比值,从而提高非操作结果的特异性,但降低耐药性的检出率。Xpert 定量信息可以确定一个涂片阴性亚组,在该亚组中,不可操作的 LPA 结果与漏检耐药的比值的收益可能被实验室接受,具体取决于具体情况。我们的研究结果允许根据上下文,合理地将直接药敏检测扩展到某些涂片阴性的痰标本。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid Molecular Assays for the Diagnosis of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis.用于诊断耐药结核病的快速分子检测方法
Infect Drug Resist. 2022 Aug 29;15:4971-4984. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S381643. eCollection 2022.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验