Rice Jason P, Seifert Marva, Moser Kathleen S, Rodwell Timothy C
Division of Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 9;12(10):e0186139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186139. eCollection 2017.
Performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay, designed to simultaneously detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) and rifampin (RIF) resistance, has been well documented in low-resource settings with high TB-incidence. However, few studies have assessed its accuracy in low TB incidence settings. We evaluated the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF using clinical sputum specimens routinely collected from suspect pulmonary TB patients over a 4-year time period in San Diego County, California. Xpert MTB/RIF results were compared to acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy, mycobacterial culture, and phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST). Of 751 sputum specimens, 134 (17.8%) were MTBC culture-positive and 2 (1.5%) were multidrug-resistant (MDR). For the detection of MTBC, Xpert MTB/RIF sensitivity was 89.6% (97.7% and 74.5% in smear-positive and -negative sputa, respectively) and specificity was 97.2%; while AFB smear sensitivity and specificity were 64.9% and 77.8%, respectively. Xpert MTB/RIF detected 35 of 47 smear-negative culture-positive specimens, and excluded 124 of 137 smear-positive culture-negative specimens. Xpert MTB/RIF also correctly excluded 99.2% (121/122) of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) specimens, including all 33 NTM false-positives by smear microscopy. For the detection of RIF resistance, Xpert MTB/RIF sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 98.3%, respectively. Our findings demonstrate that Xpert MTB/RIF is able to accurately detect MTBC and RIF resistance in routinely collected respiratory specimens in a low TB-incidence setting, with comparable performance to that achieved in high-incidence settings; and suggest that under these conditions the assay has particular utility in detecting smear-negative TB cases, excluding smear-positive patients without MTBC disease, and differentiating MTBC from NTM.
Xpert MTB/RIF检测法旨在同时检测结核分枝杆菌复合群(MTBC)和利福平(RIF)耐药性,其在结核病高发的资源匮乏地区的性能已有充分记录。然而,很少有研究评估其在结核病低发地区的准确性。我们在加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥县,对4年间从疑似肺结核患者中常规采集的临床痰液标本,评估了Xpert MTB/RIF的性能。将Xpert MTB/RIF检测结果与抗酸杆菌(AFB)涂片显微镜检查、分枝杆菌培养及表型药物敏感性试验(DST)进行比较。在751份痰液标本中,134份(17.8%)MTBC培养阳性,2份(1.5%)为耐多药(MDR)。对于MTBC的检测,Xpert MTB/RIF的敏感性为89.6%(涂片阳性和阴性痰液中分别为97.7%和74.5%),特异性为97.2%;而AFB涂片的敏感性和特异性分别为64.9%和77.8%。Xpert MTB/RIF检测出47份涂片阴性培养阳性标本中的35份,并排除了137份涂片阳性培养阴性标本中的124份。Xpert MTB/RIF还正确排除了99.2%(121/122)的非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)标本,包括涂片显微镜检查的所有33份NTM假阳性标本。对于RIF耐药性的检测,Xpert MTB/RIF的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和98.3%。我们的研究结果表明,Xpert MTB/RIF能够在结核病低发地区的常规采集呼吸道标本中准确检测MTBC和RIF耐药性,其性能与在高发地区相当;并表明在这些条件下,该检测法在检测涂片阴性肺结核病例、排除无MTBC疾病的涂片阳性患者以及区分MTBC和NTM方面具有特殊用途。