Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Center for Aging and Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Nov;38(15):3372-3380. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08275-4. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
Few guidelines address fracture prevention medication use in nursing home (NH) residents with dementia.
We sought to identify factors that influence prescriber decision-making for deprescribing of bisphosphonates for older NH residents with dementia.
We conducted 12 semi-structured interviews with prescribers who care for older adults with dementia in NHs.
Interview prompts addressed experiences treating fractures, benefits, and harms of bisphosphonates, and experiences with deprescribing. Coding was guided by the social-ecological framework including patient-level (intrapersonal) and external (interpersonal, system, community, and policy) influences.
Most prescribers were physicians (83%); 75% were female and 75% were White. Most (75%) spent less than half of their clinical effort in NHs and half were in the first decade of practice. Among patient-level influences, prescribers uniformly agreed that a prior bisphosphonate treatment course of several years, emergence of adverse effects, and changing goals of care or limited life expectancy were compelling reasons to deprescribe. External influences were frequently discussed as barriers to deprescribing. At the interpersonal level, prescribers noted that family/informal caregivers are diverse in their involvement in decision-making, and frequently concerned about the adverse effects of bisphosphonates, but perceive deprescribing as "withdrawing care." At the health system level, prescribers felt that frequent transitions make it difficult to determine duration of prior treatment and to implement deprescribing. At the policy level, prescribers highlighted the lack of guidelines addressing residents with limited mobility and dementia or criteria for deprescribing, including uncertainty in the setting of prior fractures and lack of bone densitometry in NHs.
Systems-level barriers to evaluating bone densitometry and treatment history in NHs may impede person-centered decision-making for fracture prevention. Further research is needed to evaluate the residual benefits of bisphosphonates in medically complex residents with limited mobility and dementia to inform recommendations for deprescribing versus continued use.
针对患有痴呆症的养老院(NH)居民,很少有指南涉及骨折预防药物的使用。
我们旨在确定影响痴呆症老年 NH 居民停止使用双磷酸盐药物的处方决策的因素。
我们对在 NH 中照顾老年痴呆症患者的处方医生进行了 12 次半结构化访谈。
访谈提示涉及治疗骨折的经验、双磷酸盐的益处和危害,以及停药的经验。编码受到社会生态框架的指导,包括患者层面(个体内部)和外部(人际、系统、社区和政策)的影响。
大多数处方医生是医生(83%);75%是女性,75%是白人。大多数(75%)将不到一半的临床精力用于 NH,其中一半医生处于执业的头十年。在患者层面的影响方面,医生一致认为,先前数年的双磷酸盐治疗疗程、出现不良反应、改变治疗目标或预期寿命有限,是停止治疗的有力理由。外部影响经常被认为是停药的障碍。在人际层面上,医生注意到,家属/非正式照顾者在决策参与方面存在多样性,经常担心双磷酸盐的副作用,但认为停药是“撤回治疗”。在医疗系统层面,医生认为频繁的转院使得确定先前治疗的持续时间和实施停药变得困难。在政策层面,医生强调缺乏针对活动能力有限和痴呆症的居民的指南,或缺乏停药标准,包括对先前骨折的不确定性和 NH 中缺乏骨密度测量。
NH 中评估骨密度和治疗史的系统层面障碍可能会阻碍以患者为中心的骨折预防决策。需要进一步研究以评估在活动能力有限和痴呆症的复杂医学居民中,双磷酸盐的残余益处,为停药与继续使用提供建议。