Doherty Alison Jayne, Boland Paul, Reed Janet, Clegg Andrew J, Stephani Anne-Marie, Williams Nefyn Howard, Shaw Beth, Hedgecoe Lynn, Hill Ruaraidh, Walker Lauren
Faculty of Health & Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
Faculty of Health & Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
BJGP Open. 2020 Aug 25;4(3). doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101096. Print 2020 Aug.
Managing polypharmacy is a challenge for healthcare systems globally. It is also a health inequality concern as it can expose some of the most vulnerable in society to unnecessary medications and adverse drug-related events. Care for most patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy occurs in primary care. Safe deprescribing interventions can reduce exposure to inappropriate polypharmacy. However, these are not fully accepted or routinely implemented.
To identify barriers and facilitators to safe deprescribing interventions for adults with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in primary care.
DESIGN & SETTING: A systematic review of studies published from 2000, examining safe deprescribing interventions for adults with multimorbidity and polypharmacy.
A search of electronic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINHAL), Cochrane, and Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC) from inception to 26 Feb 2019, using an agreed search strategy. This was supplemented by handsearching of relevant journals, and screening of reference lists and citations of included studies.
In total, 40 studies from 14 countries were identified. Cultural and organisational barriers included: a culture of diagnosing and prescribing; evidence-based guidance focused on single diseases; a lack of evidence-based guidance for the care of older people with multimorbidities; and a lack of shared communication, decision-making systems, tools, and resources. Interpersonal and individual-level barriers included: professional etiquette; fragmented care; prescribers' and patients' uncertainties; and gaps in tailored support. Facilitators included: prudent prescribing; greater availability and acceptability of non-pharmacological alternatives; resources; improved communication, collaboration, knowledge, and understanding; patient-centred care; and shared decision-making.
A whole systems, patient-centred approach to safe deprescribing interventions is required, involving key decision-makers, healthcare professionals, patients, and carers.
管理多重用药问题对全球医疗保健系统而言都是一项挑战。这也是一个健康不平等问题,因为它可能使社会中一些最脆弱的群体面临不必要的药物治疗和药物相关不良事件。大多数患有多种疾病和多重用药的患者在初级保健机构接受治疗。安全的减药干预措施可以减少不适当多重用药的暴露。然而,这些措施并未得到充分接受或常规实施。
确定初级保健中患有多种疾病和多重用药的成年人安全减药干预措施的障碍和促进因素。
对2000年以来发表的研究进行系统评价,并研究针对患有多种疾病和多重用药的成年人的安全减药干预措施。
使用商定的检索策略,检索电子数据库:MEDLINE、Embase、护理及相关健康文献累积索引(CINHAL)数据库、Cochrane图书馆和健康管理信息联盟(HMIC)数据库,检索时间从建库至2019年2月26日。此外,还对相关期刊进行手工检索,并对纳入研究的参考文献列表和引用文献进行筛选。
共识别出来自14个国家的40项研究。文化和组织方面的障碍包括:诊断和开药文化;侧重于单一疾病的循证指南;缺乏针对患有多种疾病的老年人护理的循证指南;以及缺乏共享的沟通、决策系统、工具和资源。人际和个人层面的障碍包括:专业礼仪;护理碎片化;开处方者和患者的不确定性;以及量身定制的支持方面的差距。促进因素包括:谨慎开药;非药物替代方案的可及性和可接受性提高;资源;沟通、协作、知识和理解的改善;以患者为中心的护理;以及共同决策。
需要采取一种以患者为中心的全系统安全减药干预方法,让关键决策者、医疗保健专业人员、患者和护理人员参与其中。