Cristofari Andrea, De Santis Marianna, Lucidi Stefano, Rothwell John, Casula Elias P, Rocchi Lorenzo
Department of Civil Engineering and Computer Science Engineering, "Tor Vergata" University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Department of Computer, Automatic and Management Engineering, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Brain Sci. 2023 May 27;13(6):866. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13060866.
The combination of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG) offers an unparalleled opportunity to study cortical physiology by characterizing brain electrical responses to external perturbation, called transcranial-evoked potentials (TEPs). Although these reflect cortical post-synaptic potentials, they can be contaminated by auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) due to the TMS click, which partly show a similar spatial and temporal scalp distribution. Therefore, TEPs and AEPs can be difficult to disentangle by common statistical methods, especially in conditions of suboptimal AEP suppression. In this work, we explored the ability of machine learning algorithms to distinguish TEPs recorded with masking of the TMS click, AEPs and non-masked TEPs in a sample of healthy subjects. Overall, our classifier provided reliable results at the single-subject level, even for signals where differences were not shown in previous works. Classification accuracy (CA) was lower at the group level, when different subjects were used for training and test phases, and when three stimulation conditions instead of two were compared. Lastly, CA was higher when average, rather than single-trial TEPs, were used. In conclusion, this proof-of-concept study proposes machine learning as a promising tool to separate pure TEPs from those contaminated by sensory input.
经颅磁刺激(TMS)与脑电图(EEG)相结合,为通过表征大脑对外部扰动的电反应(即经颅诱发电位,TEP)来研究皮质生理学提供了无与伦比的机会。尽管这些反应反映了皮质突触后电位,但由于TMS点击声会诱发听觉诱发电位(AEP),且部分AEP在头皮上的空间和时间分布与TEP相似,所以TEP可能会受到AEP的干扰。因此,采用常规统计方法很难区分TEP和AEP,在AEP抑制效果欠佳的情况下尤其如此。在本研究中,我们探讨了机器学习算法在健康受试者样本中区分经TMS点击声掩蔽记录的TEP、AEP和未掩蔽TEP的能力。总体而言,即使对于先前研究中未显示出差异的信号,我们的分类器在单受试者水平上也能提供可靠的结果。当在训练和测试阶段使用不同受试者,以及比较三种而非两种刺激条件时,在组水平上分类准确率(CA)较低。最后,使用平均TEP而非单次试验TEP时,CA更高。总之,这项概念验证研究提出,机器学习是将纯TEP与受感觉输入污染的TEP区分开来的一种很有前景的工具。