Friman P C
Pediatr Clin North Am. 1986 Aug;33(4):871-86. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)36078-3.
Prevention of enuresis has not been studied directly. Positive results from a randomized clinical trial evaluating early intervention for children at risk for enuresis would establish the value of prevention and help to promote its practice. Enuresis is not a disease process, and therefore a clinical trial may never be conducted, but the treatment of enuresis can be a threat to the child's health, as can the parental, professional, and peer response to the wetting. Children cannot die from wetting the bed. They can die from the medicine given to them to stop the bed wetting. Wet beds cannot cause contusions, abrasions, and concussions. Punishments administered for bed wetting can. Urine cannot cause emotional disturbance. Ridiculing, admonishing, or singling out a child for urinating can. Numerous suggestions are available to help to prevent the problems linked to enuresis, and perhaps to prevent enuresis itself. They range from the simple (e.g., waiting for the problem to resolve itself) to the very complex (e.g., promoting a change in the DSM-III criteria). The preventive suggestions in this paper are by no means exhaustive. Rather, they are an example of suggestions that can come from the literature on each aspect of enuresis: diagnosis, incidence, etiology, and treatment. A review of this literature reveals that, no matter which aspect of enuresis a researcher investigated or which body of findings a clinician examined, increased prevention could be the outcome. Child health should be the provider's abiding concern when choosing a treatment for enuresis. Management by parents and health care providers constitutes the primary threat that enuresis poses to emotional and physical health. Historically, the choice of treatment was governed more by the possibility of continence than by possible side effects on child health. The decision to use a treatment should be guided by the pediatrician's assessment of the child's readiness, willingness of the child and parents, and family resources. Although treatment is evolving, some interventions are highly rigorous and appear to focus primarily on dryness (e.g., the original dry-bed training). Treatment for enuresis has not yet been conceptualized into an encompassing context of health as have other medical maneuvers (e.g., physical examinations are now part of health maintenance). Enuresis is a presenting complaint that is not of itself a threat to health. Prevention, therefore, is its most appropriate context, and the pediatrician is the primary promoter of that context.
遗尿症的预防尚未得到直接研究。一项评估对有遗尿风险儿童进行早期干预的随机临床试验若取得阳性结果,将确立预防的价值并有助于推广其应用。遗尿症并非一种疾病过程,因此或许永远不会开展临床试验,但遗尿症的治疗可能对儿童健康构成威胁,父母、专业人士及同伴对尿床的反应也会如此。儿童不会因尿床而死亡。他们可能会因用于阻止尿床的药物而死亡。尿床不会导致瘀伤、擦伤和脑震荡。因尿床而施加的惩罚却可能导致这些后果。尿液不会引起情绪困扰。因孩子尿床而嘲笑、告诫或使其难堪则可能导致情绪困扰。有许多建议可帮助预防与遗尿症相关的问题,甚至可能预防遗尿症本身。这些建议从简单的(例如,等待问题自行解决)到非常复杂的(例如,推动对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版标准的修订)都有。本文中的预防性建议绝非详尽无遗。相反,它们是可从关于遗尿症各个方面(诊断、发病率、病因和治疗)的文献中得出的建议示例。对该文献的回顾表明,无论研究人员调查遗尿症的哪个方面,也无论临床医生审视哪组研究结果,增加预防都可能是最终结果。在为遗尿症选择治疗方法时,儿童健康应是医疗服务提供者始终关注的问题。父母和医疗服务提供者的管理构成了遗尿症对情绪和身体健康造成的主要威胁。从历史上看,治疗方法的选择更多地受实现不尿床可能性的影响,而非对儿童健康可能产生的副作用。使用某种治疗方法的决定应以儿科医生对儿童准备情况、儿童及其父母的意愿以及家庭资源的评估为指导。尽管治疗方法在不断发展,但一些干预措施非常严格,似乎主要侧重于实现干爽(例如,最初的干床训练)。与其他医疗手段(例如,体格检查现在是健康维护的一部分)不同,遗尿症的治疗尚未被纳入一个全面的健康背景中。遗尿症是一种就诊主诉,其本身并非对健康的威胁。因此,预防是其最合适的背景,而儿科医生是这一背景的主要推动者。