Bongetta Daniele, de Laurentis Camilla, Bruno Raffaele, Versace Alessandro, Colombo Elena Virginia, Giussani Carlo Giorgio, Assietti Roberto
Neurosurgery Unit, Ospedale Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico, 20121 Milano, Italy.
Neurosurgery Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy.
Life (Basel). 2023 Jun 16;13(6):1401. doi: 10.3390/life13061401.
As life expectancy rises, more elderly people undergo spinal fusion surgery to treat lumbar degenerative diseases. The MIS-TLIF technique, which minimizes soft tissue manipulation, is a promising fusion technique for frailer patients. The aim of this study was to investigate if older age is a significant factor in the clinical outcome of single- or double-level MIS-TLIF. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 103 consecutive patients. Data were compared between younger (<65 y.o.) and older (≥65 y.o.) patients. We observed no significant differences between baseline characteristics of the two groups apart from the frequency of disk space treated, with a relative predominance of L3-L4 space treated in the elderly (10% vs. 28%, = 0.01) and L5-S1 space in younger patients (36% vs. 5%, = 0.006). There was no significant difference in complication rate, surgical satisfaction, EQ 5D-5L, or Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) global or specific scores, with the exception of the EQ 5D-5L "mobility" score, where older patients fared worse (1.8 ± 1.1 vs. 2.3 ± 1.4; = 0.05). The minimal invasiveness of the surgical technique, age-related specific outcome expectations, and biomechanical issues are all potential factors influencing the lack of age group differences in outcome scores.
随着预期寿命的提高,越来越多的老年人接受脊柱融合手术来治疗腰椎退行性疾病。MIS-TLIF技术能将软组织操作降至最低,对于身体较为虚弱的患者来说是一种很有前景的融合技术。本研究的目的是调查高龄是否是单节段或双节段MIS-TLIF临床结果的一个重要因素。对103例连续患者进行了横断面研究。比较了年轻患者(<65岁)和老年患者(≥65岁)的数据。我们观察到两组的基线特征之间没有显著差异,除了治疗的椎间盘间隙频率,老年患者中L3-L4间隙治疗相对占优势(10%对28%,P = 0.01),而年轻患者中L5-S1间隙治疗相对占优势(36%对5%,P = 0.006)。并发症发生率、手术满意度、EQ 5D-5L或Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)的总体或特定评分均无显著差异,但EQ 5D-5L“活动能力”评分除外,老年患者在该评分上表现较差(1.8±1.1对2.3±1.4;P = 0.05)。手术技术的微创性、与年龄相关的特定结果预期以及生物力学问题都是影响结果评分中年龄组差异缺乏的潜在因素。