• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰痛患者的 EQ-5D-3L 和 5L 版本评估。

Evaluation of the EQ-5D-3L and 5L versions in low back pain patients.

机构信息

Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Surgery, Innlandet Hospital Gjøvik, Gjøvik, Norway.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 May 28;19(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01792-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12955-021-01792-y
PMID:34049574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8160396/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The EuroQol EQ-5D is one of the most widely researched and applied patient-reported outcome measures worldwide. The original EQ-5D-3L and more recent EQ-5D-5L include three and five response categories respectively. Evidence from healthy and sick populations shows that the additional two response categories improve measurement properties but there has not been a concurrent comparison of the two versions in patients with low back pain (LBP).

METHODS

LBP patients taking part in a multicenter randomized controlled trial of lumbar total disc replacement and conservative treatment completed the EQ-5D-3L and 5L in an eight-year follow-up questionnaire. The 3L and 5L were assessed for aspects of data quality including missing data, floor and ceiling effects, response consistency, and based on a priori hypotheses, associations with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pain-Visual Analogue Scales and Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25).

RESULTS

At the eight-year follow-up, 151 (87%) patients were available and 146 completed both the 3L and 5L. Levels of missing data were the same for the two versions. Compared to the EQ-5D-5L, the 3L had significantly higher floor (pain discomfort) and ceiling effects (mobility, self-care, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). For these patients the EQ-5D-5L described 73 health states compared to 28 for the 3L. Shannon's indices showed the 5L outperformed the 3L in tests of classification efficiency. Correlations with the ODI, Pain-VAS and HSCL-25 were largely as hypothesized, the 5L having slightly higher correlations than the 3L.

CONCLUSION

The EQ-5D assesses important aspect of health in LBP patients and the 5L improves upon the 3L in this respect. The EQ-5D-5L is recommended in preference to the 3L version, however, further testing in other back pain populations together with additional measurement properties, including responsiveness to change, is recommended.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

retrospectively registered: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01704677 .

摘要

背景

EuroQol EQ-5D 是全球应用最广泛的患者报告结局测量之一。原始的 EQ-5D-3L 和最近的 EQ-5D-5L 分别包含三个和五个反应类别。来自健康人群和患病人群的证据表明,增加的两个反应类别可以改善测量特性,但在腰痛(LBP)患者中尚未同时比较这两个版本。

方法

参与腰椎全椎间盘置换和保守治疗的多中心随机对照试验的 LBP 患者在八年随访问卷中完成了 EQ-5D-3L 和 5L。根据先前的假设,从数据质量的各个方面评估了 3L 和 5L,包括缺失数据、地板和天花板效应、反应一致性,并与 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)、疼痛视觉模拟量表和 Hopkins 症状清单(HSCL-25)进行了关联。

结果

在八年随访时,151 名(87%)患者可用于研究,其中 146 名患者同时完成了 3L 和 5L。两种版本的缺失数据水平相同。与 EQ-5D-5L 相比,EQ-5D-3L 具有明显更高的地板(疼痛不适)和天花板效应(移动性、自我护理、疼痛/不适、焦虑/抑郁)。对于这些患者,EQ-5D-5L 描述了 73 种健康状态,而 EQ-5D-3L 仅描述了 28 种。Shannon 指数表明,5L 在分类效率测试中优于 3L。与 ODI、疼痛 VAS 和 HSCL-25 的相关性在很大程度上符合假设,5L 的相关性略高于 3L。

结论

EQ-5D 评估了 LBP 患者健康的重要方面,并且在这方面,5L 优于 3L。建议优先使用 EQ-5D-5L 版本,然而,建议在其他腰痛人群中进一步测试,并进行其他测量特性的测试,包括对变化的反应性。

试验注册

回顾性注册:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01704677。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the EQ-5D-3L and 5L versions in low back pain patients.腰痛患者的 EQ-5D-3L 和 5L 版本评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 May 28;19(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01792-y.
2
Measurement properties of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in recording self-reported health status in older patients with substantial multimorbidity and polypharmacy.EQ-5D-3L 和 EQ-5D-5L 在记录有大量合并症和多种药物治疗的老年患者自报健康状况方面的测量性能。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Sep 29;18(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01564-0.
3
The EQ-5D-5L Is Superior to the -3L Version in Measuring Health-related Quality of Life in Patients Awaiting THA or TKA.在测量等待全髋关节置换术或全膝关节置换术的患者的健康相关生活质量方面,EQ-5D-5L 优于 -3L 版本。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jul;477(7):1632-1644. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000662.
4
Differential Psychometric Properties of EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level and Short-Form 6-Dimension Utility Measures in Low Back Pain.《腰痛患者欧洲五维健康量表 5 维度 5 水平版与六维度简短量表效用测量的差异心理测量学特性》
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jun 1;44(11):E679-E686. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002939.
5
Psychometric comparison of the standard EQ-5D to a 5 level version in cancer patients.癌症患者中标准EQ - 5D与5级版本的心理测量学比较。
Med Care. 2007 Mar;45(3):259-63. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000254515.63841.81.
6
Comparison of EQ-5D-3L and 5L versions following operative fixation of closed ankle fractures.比较经手术固定的闭合性踝关节骨折患者使用 EQ-5D-3L 版和 5L 版的情况。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Jul;31(7):2071-2082. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03105-2. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
7
The EQ-5D-5L is More Discriminative Than the EQ-5D-3L in Patients with Diabetes in Singapore.在新加坡糖尿病患者中,EQ-5D-5L比EQ-5D-3L更具区分能力。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2016 May;9:57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2015.11.003. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
8
Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to EQ-5D-3L in the Thai diabetes patients.泰国糖尿病患者中EQ-5D-5L与EQ-5D-3L相比的测量属性
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Feb 6;13:14. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0203-3.
9
Reliability and validity of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L in patients with osteoarthritis referred for hip and knee replacement.在因髋膝关节置换而转诊的骨关节炎患者中,EQ-5D-5L与EQ-5D-3L相比的可靠性和有效性。
Qual Life Res. 2015 Jul;24(7):1775-84. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0910-6. Epub 2015 Jan 3.
10
Validity of EQ-5D-5L health-related quality of life questionnaire in self-reported diabetes: evidence from a general population survey.EQ-5D-5L 健康相关生活质量问卷在自我报告糖尿病中的有效性:来自一般人群调查的证据。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 May 5;19(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01780-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Myofascial Release Combined With Capacitive-Resistive Therapy in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.肌筋膜松解联合电容电阻疗法治疗慢性非特异性下腰痛的疗效:一项随机对照试验
Pain Res Manag. 2025 Jul 11;2025:9309502. doi: 10.1155/prm/9309502. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative Efficacy of Fluoroscopy-guided Sacroiliac Joint Block versus Conservative Management in Sacroiliitis: A Prospective Cohort Study.荧光透视引导下骶髂关节阻滞与保守治疗在骶髂关节炎中的疗效比较:一项前瞻性队列研究
J Orthop Case Rep. 2025 May;15(5):285-290. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i05.5636.
3
Comparison of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L instruments in patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.单髁膝关节置换术患者中EQ-5D-3L和EQ-5D-5L工具的比较。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 6;11:1451979. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1451979. eCollection 2024.
4
A multidisciplinary pain management program for patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized, single-blind, controlled, feasibility study.一项针对慢性下腰痛患者的多学科疼痛管理计划:一项随机、单盲、对照的可行性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jan 17;26(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08294-8.
5
DREAM: an adaptive, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of duloxetine for reducing leg pain in people with chronic sciatica-trial protocol.DREAM:一项关于度洛西汀减轻慢性坐骨神经痛患者腿部疼痛的适应性、随机、安慰剂对照试验——试验方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 31;14(12):e096796. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096796.
6
Differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation in patients with Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type II: a study protocol for a 12-month multicentre cohort study (DETECT).差异靶点脊髓刺激治疗持续性脊髓痛综合征 II 型患者的研究方案:一项为期 12 个月的多中心队列研究(DETECT)
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 9;14(11):e083610. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083610.
7
Analysis of Health-Related Quality of Life in Elderly Patients with Stroke Complicated by Hypertension in China Using the EQ-5D-3L Scale.使用EQ-5D-3L量表对中国老年高血压合并脑卒中患者的健康相关生活质量进行分析。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Apr 30;17:1981-1997. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S459629. eCollection 2024.
8
Validation of the arabic version of the EuroQol-5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5 L) in patients with spinal degenerative diseases.阿拉伯语版欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D-5L)在脊柱退行性疾病患者中的效度验证
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 23;24(1):1119. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18367-3.
9
How do survivors after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest perceive their health compared to the norm population? A nationwide registry study from Norway.与正常人群相比,院外心脏骤停幸存者如何看待自己的健康状况?一项来自挪威的全国性登记研究。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Jan 9;17:100549. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100549. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
First trans-diagnostic experiences with a novel micro-choice based concentrated group rehabilitation for patients with low back pain, long COVID, and type 2 diabetes: a pilot study.新型基于微选择的集中团体康复治疗腰痛、长新冠和 2 型糖尿病患者的跨诊断初步经验:一项试点研究。
BMC Med. 2024 Jan 11;22(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03237-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the three-level and the five-level versions of the EQ-5D.EQ-5D 的三等级版本与五等级版本的比较。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Jun;22(4):621-628. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01279-z. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
2
The measurement performance of the EQ-5D-5L versus EQ-5D-3L in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa.中重度化脓性汗腺炎患者 EQ-5D-5L 与 EQ-5D-3L 的测量性能比较。
Qual Life Res. 2021 May;30(5):1477-1490. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02732-x. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
3
Measurement Properties of the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L in Six Commonly Diagnosed Cancers.EQ-5D-5L 和 EQ-5D-3L 在六种常见癌症中的测量性能。
Patient. 2021 Mar;14(2):209-222. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00466-z. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
4
Measurement properties of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in recording self-reported health status in older patients with substantial multimorbidity and polypharmacy.EQ-5D-3L 和 EQ-5D-5L 在记录有大量合并症和多种药物治疗的老年患者自报健康状况方面的测量性能。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Sep 29;18(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01564-0.
5
A head-to-head comparison of measurement properties of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in acute myeloid leukemia patients.急性髓系白血病患者中 EQ-5D-3L 与 EQ-5D-5L 的测量特性的头对头比较。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Mar;30(3):855-866. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02644-w. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
6
Comparing EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L performance in common cancers: suggestions for instrument choosing.比较 EQ-5D-3L 和 EQ-5D-5L 在常见癌症中的表现:工具选择建议。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Mar;30(3):841-854. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02636-w. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
7
Psychometric properties comparison between EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L in the general Thai population.在泰国普通人群中,EQ-5D-5L 与 EQ-5D-3L 的心理测量学特性比较。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Dec;29(12):3407-3417. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02595-2. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
8
Elicitation of Norwegian EQ-5D-5L values for hypothetical and experience-based health states based on the EuroQol Valuation Technology (EQ-VT) protocol.基于 EuroQol 估值技术(EQ-VT)协议,对假设和基于经验的健康状况进行挪威 EQ-5D-5L 值的 elicitation。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 11;10(6):e034683. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034683.
9
Responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in patients following total hip or knee replacement.全髋关节或全膝关节置换术后患者的 EQ-5D-3L 和 EQ-5D-5L 的反应性。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Sep;28(9):2409-2417. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02200-1. Epub 2019 May 14.
10
A head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-5 L and SF-6D in Chinese patients with low back pain.中文腰痛患者 EQ-5D-5L 与 SF-6D 的头对头比较。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Apr 11;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1137-6.