Gertzbein S D, Tile M, McMurty R Y, Kellam J F, Hunter G A, Keith R G, Harsanyi Z, Luffman J
Pharmacotherapy. 1986 May-Jun;6(3):104-7. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.1986.tb03462.x.
Patients who experienced pain after surgery were administered a single dose of 1 of 3 treatments: acetaminophen 1000 mg, codeine phosphate 60 mg, or a combination of these. Patients rated their pain intensity on ordinal and visual analog scales just prior to medication and at intervals thereafter for up to 5 hours. They also rated pain relief, pain half gone, and any adverse effects. Sum of pain intensity difference and total pain relief scores were analyzed using Dunnett's procedure. The drug combination was statistically superior to codeine as measured by SPID, TOTPAR, pain half gone, and time to remedication. The combination achieved better mean scores than acetaminophen on all efficacy measures, but was (marginally) statistically superior only in pain half gone. No appreciable differences in adverse effects were noted among the treatments. The difficulty of showing the analgesic efficacy of codeine in a single dose trial is discussed.
对乙酰氨基酚1000毫克、磷酸可待因60毫克或两者的组合。患者在用药前以及之后每隔一段时间直至5小时,用顺序量表和视觉模拟量表对疼痛强度进行评分。他们还对疼痛缓解程度、疼痛减轻一半的情况以及任何不良反应进行评分。使用邓尼特检验法分析疼痛强度差异总和及总疼痛缓解分数。通过疼痛强度差异总和(SPID)、总疼痛缓解率(TOTPAR)、疼痛减轻一半以及再次用药时间来衡量,药物组合在统计学上优于可待因。在所有疗效指标上,该组合的平均得分均优于对乙酰氨基酚,但仅在疼痛减轻一半方面(勉强)在统计学上更具优势。各治疗组之间未观察到明显的不良反应差异。文中讨论了在单剂量试验中显示可待因镇痛效果的困难。