Suppr超能文献

对乙酰氨基酚及其与可待因和咖啡因联用治疗手术疼痛的镇痛效果——一项荟萃分析

Analgesic efficacy of paracetamol and its combination with codeine and caffeine in surgical pain--a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhang W Y, Li Wan Po A

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Science, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, U.K.

出版信息

J Clin Pharm Ther. 1996 Aug;21(4):261-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.1996.tb01148.x.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to quantify the analgesic efficacy of paracetamol and its combination with codeine or caffeine through a systematic overview and meta-analysis of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Systematic retrieval of relevant clinical trials was carried out using computerized searches, historical searches and communication with manufacturers. The results of RCTs were pooled to estimate (i) the difference in percentage improvement of total pain relief (TOTPAR%) and the sum of pain intensity difference (SPID%); (ii) the proportions of patients obtaining moderate to excellent pain relief relative to placebo (ResRR) and (iii) the ratio of patients requiring analgesic re-medication (RemRR). Head-to-head comparisons were also undertaken for paracetamol versus its combination with codeine or caffeine. A total of 80 RCT reports describing 103 placebo comparisons and 26 head-to-head comparisons were identified. The total pain relief score in the single dose studies increased by 38 percentage points for paracetamol and by 24 points for placebo. The difference (d) in TOTPAR% between the two was highly significant (d = 14, 95% CI: 12, 16). For the difference in SPID%, d = 12, 95% CI: 11, 13. Patients were more than twice as likely to obtain moderate to excellent pain relief on paracetamol than on placebo (ResRR = 2.39, 95% CI: 1.89, 3.02), and less likely to require re-medication (RemRR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.69, 0.88). There was no significant (P > 0.05) dose-response relationship. The analgesic efficacy of paracetamol 600 mg was enhanced with the addition of codeine 60 mg (using TOTPAR% as outcome) in both indirect and head-to-head comparisons. SPID%, but not ResRR and RemRR, data supported this conclusion. Much weaker effects were observed with the caffeine combination. Adverse effects were mild. Surprisingly, drowsiness was seen more often with paracetamol and paracetamol-codeine combinations than with placebo. The relative risks (95% CI) were 1.83 (1.29, 2.59) and 2.39 (1.58, 3.57), respectively. In conclusion paracetamol is an effective analgesic for post-surgical pain. Caffeine adds little to the analgesic effect of paracetamol. However, there is some evidence that codeine 60 mg adds to the analgesic effects of paracetamol 600 mg, using pain relief or pain intensity scores as outcomes, but this is not necessarily translated into an increase in number of patients who obtain moderate to excellent pain relief.

摘要

本研究的目的是通过对相关随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统综述和荟萃分析,来量化对乙酰氨基酚及其与可待因或咖啡因联合使用的镇痛效果。通过计算机检索、历史检索以及与制造商沟通,对相关临床试验进行了系统检索。汇总RCT的结果以估计:(i)总疼痛缓解百分比改善(TOTPAR%)和疼痛强度差异总和(SPID%)的差异;(ii)相对于安慰剂,获得中度至极佳疼痛缓解的患者比例(ResRR);(iii)需要再次使用镇痛药的患者比例(RemRR)。还对乙酰氨基酚与其与可待因或咖啡因的联合用药进行了直接比较。共识别出80篇RCT报告,描述了103次与安慰剂的比较以及26次直接比较。单剂量研究中,对乙酰氨基酚组的总疼痛缓解评分提高了38个百分点,安慰剂组提高了24个百分点。两者在TOTPAR%上的差异(d)非常显著(d = 14,95%CI:12,16)。对于SPID%的差异,d = 12,95%CI:11,13。服用对乙酰氨基酚的患者获得中度至极佳疼痛缓解的可能性是服用安慰剂患者的两倍多(ResRR = 2.39,95%CI:1.89,3.02),且再次用药的可能性较小(RemRR = 0.78,95%CI:0.69,0.88)。不存在显著的(P > 0.05)剂量反应关系。在间接和直接比较中,添加60 mg可待因后,600 mg对乙酰氨基酚的镇痛效果均得到增强(以TOTPAR%为指标)。SPID%的数据支持这一结论,但ResRR和RemRR的数据不支持。观察到与咖啡因联合使用的效果要弱得多。不良反应较轻。令人惊讶的是,服用对乙酰氨基酚和对乙酰氨基酚 - 可待因组合的患者比服用安慰剂的患者更常出现嗜睡。相对风险(95%CI)分别为1.83(1.29,2.59)和2.39(1.58,3.57)。总之,对乙酰氨基酚是一种有效的术后疼痛镇痛药。咖啡因对对乙酰氨基酚的镇痛效果几乎没有增强作用。然而,有一些证据表明,以疼痛缓解或疼痛强度评分作为指标,60 mg可待因可增强600 mg对乙酰氨基酚 的镇痛效果,但这不一定转化为获得中度至极佳疼痛缓解的患者数量增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验