Miron Adrian, Giurcaneanu Calin, Mihai Mara Madalina, Beiu Cristina, Voiculescu Vlad Mihai, Popescu Marius Nicolae, Soare Elena, Popa Liliana Gabriela
Department of General Surgery, Elias Emergency University Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, No. 37 Dionisie Lupu Str., 030167 Bucharest, Romania.
Clinic of General Surgery, Elias Emergency University Hospital, No. 17 Marasti Blvd., 011461 Bucharest, Romania.
Pharmaceutics. 2023 May 28;15(6):1606. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15061606.
Chronic wounds encompass a myriad of lesions, including venous and arterial leg ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), pressure ulcers, non-healing surgical wounds and others. Despite the etiological differences, chronic wounds share several features at a molecular level. The wound bed is a convenient environment for microbial adherence, colonization and infection, with the initiation of a complex host-microbiome interplay. Chronic wound infections with mono- or poly-microbial biofilms are frequent and their management is challenging due to tolerance and resistance to antimicrobial therapy (systemic antibiotic or antifungal therapy or antiseptic topicals) and to the host's immune defense mechanisms. The ideal dressing should maintain moisture, allow water and gas permeability, absorb wound exudates, protect against bacteria and other infectious agents, be biocompatible, be non-allergenic, be non-toxic and biodegradable, be easy to use and remove and, last but not least, it should be cost-efficient. Although many wound dressings possess intrinsic antimicrobial properties acting as a barrier to pathogen invasion, adding anti-infectious targeted agents to the wound dressing may increase their efficiency. Antimicrobial biomaterials may represent a potential substitute for systemic treatment of chronic wound infections. In this review, we aim to describe the available types of antimicrobial biomaterials for chronic wound care and discuss the host response and the spectrum of pathophysiologic changes resulting from the contact between biomaterials and host tissues.
慢性伤口包括多种损伤,如腿部静脉和动脉溃疡、糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)、压疮、不愈合的手术伤口等。尽管病因不同,但慢性伤口在分子水平上具有一些共同特征。伤口床为微生物的黏附、定植和感染提供了适宜的环境,从而引发复杂的宿主-微生物群相互作用。慢性伤口感染常伴有单微生物或多微生物生物膜,由于其对抗菌治疗(全身抗生素或抗真菌治疗或外用防腐剂)以及宿主免疫防御机制具有耐受性和抗性,因此其治疗具有挑战性。理想的敷料应保持湿润,具有水和气体渗透性,能吸收伤口渗出液,防止细菌和其他感染因子侵入,具有生物相容性,无致敏性,无毒且可生物降解,易于使用和去除,最后但同样重要的是,应具有成本效益。尽管许多伤口敷料具有内在的抗菌特性,可作为病原体入侵的屏障,但在伤口敷料中添加抗感染靶向药物可能会提高其效率。抗菌生物材料可能是慢性伤口感染全身治疗的潜在替代品。在本综述中,我们旨在描述用于慢性伤口护理的抗菌生物材料的现有类型,并讨论宿主反应以及生物材料与宿主组织接触所导致的病理生理变化范围。