Aboye Genet Tadese, Vande Walle Martijn, Simegn Gizeaddis Lamesgin, Aerts Jean-Marie
M3-BIORES (Measure, Model & Manage Bioreponses), Division of Animal and Human Health Engineering, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
School of Biomedical Engineering, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Digit Health. 2023 Jun 21;9:20552076231180972. doi: 10.1177/20552076231180972. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
mHealth can help with healthcare service delivery for various health issues, but there's a significant gap in the availability and use of mHealth systems between sub-Saharan Africa and Europe, despite the ongoing digitalization of the global healthcare system.
This work aims to compare and investigate the use and availability of mHealth systems in sub-Saharan Africa and Europe, and identify gaps in current mHealth development and implementation in both regions.
The study adhered to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines for article search and selection to ensure an unbiased comparison between sub-Saharan Africa and Europe. Four databases (Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and PubMed) were used, and articles were evaluated based on predetermined criteria. Details on the mHealth system type, goal, patient type, health concern, and development stage were collected and recorded in a Microsoft Excel worksheet.
The search query produced 1020 articles for sub-Saharan Africa and 2477 articles for Europe. After screening for eligibility, 86 articles for sub-Saharan Africa and 297 articles for Europe were included. To minimize bias, two reviewers conducted the article screening and data retrieval. Sub-Saharan Africa used SMS and call-based mHealth methods for consultation and diagnosis, mainly for young patients such as children and mothers, and for issues such as HIV, pregnancy, childbirth, and child care. Europe relied more on apps, sensors, and wearables for monitoring, with the elderly as the most common patient group, and the most common health issues being cardiovascular disease and heart failure.
Wearable technology and external sensors are heavily used in Europe, whereas they are seldom used in sub-Saharan Africa. More efforts should be made to use the mHealth system to improve health outcomes in both regions, incorporating more cutting-edge technologies like wearables internal and external sensors. Undertaking context-based studies, identifying determinants of mHealth systems use, and considering these determinants during mHealth system design could enhance mHealth availability and utilization.
移动健康可以帮助解决各种健康问题的医疗服务提供,但尽管全球医疗系统正在数字化,撒哈拉以南非洲和欧洲之间在移动健康系统的可用性和使用方面仍存在显著差距。
这项工作旨在比较和调查撒哈拉以南非洲和欧洲移动健康系统的使用和可用性,并确定这两个地区当前移动健康发展和实施中的差距。
该研究遵循PRISMA 2020文章检索和选择指南,以确保撒哈拉以南非洲和欧洲之间进行无偏比较。使用了四个数据库(Scopus、科学网、IEEE Xplore和PubMed),并根据预定标准对文章进行评估。收集了移动健康系统类型、目标、患者类型、健康问题和发展阶段的详细信息,并记录在Microsoft Excel工作表中。
搜索查询为撒哈拉以南非洲产生了1020篇文章,为欧洲产生了2477篇文章。在筛选合格文章后,纳入了撒哈拉以南非洲的86篇文章和欧洲的297篇文章。为了尽量减少偏差,两名评审员进行了文章筛选和数据检索。撒哈拉以南非洲使用基于短信和呼叫的移动健康方法进行咨询和诊断,主要针对儿童和母亲等年轻患者,以及艾滋病毒、怀孕、分娩和儿童护理等问题。欧洲更多地依赖应用程序、传感器和可穿戴设备进行监测,最常见的患者群体是老年人,最常见的健康问题是心血管疾病和心力衰竭。
可穿戴技术和外部传感器在欧洲大量使用,而在撒哈拉以南非洲很少使用。应该做出更多努力,利用移动健康系统改善这两个地区的健康结果,纳入更多前沿技术,如内部和外部可穿戴传感器。开展基于背景的研究,确定移动健康系统使用的决定因素,并在移动健康系统设计过程中考虑这些决定因素,可以提高移动健康的可用性和利用率。