Suppr超能文献

头孢他啶-阿维巴坦联合或不联合氨曲南与基于多黏菌素的联合疗法治疗耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌:一项回顾性分析

Ceftazidime-avibactam with or without Aztreonam vs Polymyxin-based Combination Therapy for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: A Retrospective Analysis.

作者信息

Prayag Parikshit S, Patwardhan Sampada A, Panchakshari Shweta, Sambasivam Ramya, Dhupad Surabhi, Soman Rajeev N, Prayag Amrita P

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital, Pune, India.

Department of Microbiology, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital, Pune, India.

出版信息

Indian J Crit Care Med. 2023 Jun;27(6):444-450. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24481.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Gram-negative sepsis remains one of the most difficult to treat infections in intensive care units (ICUs). Carbapenems are often considered to be robust and reliable options for treating infections due to Gram-negative bacteria. The dominance of carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE) has emerged as one of the greatest challenges faced by the medical community today. Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae may be resistant to all beta lactam antimicrobials including carbapenems and often, are even resistant to other classes of drugs. There are limited studies comparing polymyxin-based therapies with ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI)-based therapies for treating infections caused by CRE.

METHODS

A retrospective study comparing outcomes between patients with bacteremia caused by CRE treated with polymyxin-based combination therapy and CAZ-AVI-based therapy (with or without aztreonam).

RESULTS

Of total 104 patients, 78 (75%) were in the CAZ-AVI group. There was no significant difference in the underlying comorbidities between the two groups. The incidence of nephrotoxicity was significantly higher in the polymyxin group ( = 0.017). Ceftazidime-avibactam-based therapy was 66% less likely to be associated with day 14 mortality ( = 0.048) and 67% less likely to be associated with day 28 mortality ( = 0.039) as compared with polymyxin-based therapy.

CONCLUSION

Ceftazidime-avibactam-based therapy may be a superior option to polymyxin-based therapy for infections caused by CRE. This can have significant practical applications, in terms of optimizing therapy for the individual patient as well as sparing polymyxins and reducing the use of polymyxins in our hospitals.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Prayag PS, Patwardhan SA, Panchakshari S, Sambasivam R, Dhupad S, Soman RN, . Ceftazidime-avibactam with or without Aztreonam vs Polymyxin-based Combination Therapy for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: A Retrospective Analysis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(6):444-450.

摘要

引言

革兰氏阴性菌败血症仍然是重症监护病房(ICU)中最难治疗的感染之一。碳青霉烯类药物通常被认为是治疗革兰氏阴性菌感染的有效且可靠的选择。耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌(CRE)的出现已成为当今医学界面临的最大挑战之一。耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌可能对包括碳青霉烯类在内的所有β-内酰胺类抗菌药物耐药,而且往往对其他类别的药物也耐药。比较基于多黏菌素的疗法与基于头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CAZ-AVI)的疗法治疗CRE所致感染的研究有限。

方法

一项回顾性研究,比较接受基于多黏菌素的联合疗法和基于CAZ-AVI的疗法(联合或不联合氨曲南)治疗的CRE所致菌血症患者的结局。

结果

在总共104例患者中,78例(75%)在CAZ-AVI组。两组的基础合并症无显著差异。多黏菌素组的肾毒性发生率显著更高(P = 0.017)。与基于多黏菌素的疗法相比,基于头孢他啶-阿维巴坦的疗法在第14天死亡率方面的相关性低66%(P = 0.048),在第28天死亡率方面的相关性低67%(P = 0.039)。

结论

对于CRE所致感染,基于头孢他啶-阿维巴坦的疗法可能是优于基于多黏菌素的疗法的选择。这在为个体患者优化治疗以及在我们医院中节约多黏菌素并减少其使用方面可能具有重要的实际应用价值。

如何引用本文

Prayag PS, Patwardhan SA, Panchakshari S, Sambasivam R, Dhupad S, Soman RN, 。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦联合或不联合氨曲南与基于多黏菌素的联合疗法治疗耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌:一项回顾性分析。《印度重症监护医学杂志》2023;27(6):444 - 450。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e7a/10291660/d15d526ca46f/ijccm-27-444-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验