Chen Juan, Liang Qiqiang, Chen Xinyi, Wu Jing, Wu Yanchao, Teng Gaoqin, Huang Man
Department of General Intensive Care Unit, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Infect Drug Resist. 2022 Feb 25;15:655-667. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S350976. eCollection 2022.
Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) monotherapy and polymyxin B-based combination therapy are currently two treatment options for patients with carbapenem-resistant (CRPA) infection; however, few studies have contrasted the relative efficacy of the two antibiotic regimens. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of CAZ/AVI and polymyxin B against CRPA infection and analyze the independent predictors of 30-day mortality or survival.
This single-center retrospective observational study included patients with CRPA infection treated with CAZ/AVI or polymyxin B between January 2018 and December 2020. The primary outcomes were the 14-day and 30-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and bacterial clearance. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between the two groups, and COX regression analysis was used to identify predictors of 30-day mortality.
A total of 136 patients with CRPA infection were enrolled, including 51 patients in the CAZ/AVI group and 85 patients in the polymyxin B group. The 14-day mortality (5.9% vs 27.1%, p=0.002), 30-day mortality (13.7% vs 47.1%, p<0.001) and in-hospital mortality (29.4% vs 60.0%, p=0.001) in the CAZ/AVI group were significantly lower than the polymyxin B group. The bacterial clearance rate (45.1% vs 12.9%, p<0.001) in the CAZ/AVI group were higher than in the polymyxin B group. After adjustment by propensity score matching, the CAV/AVI group still had lower 30-day mortality (14.3% vs 42.9%, p=0.018) and higher bacterial clearance rate (42.9% vs 14.3%, p=0.018) than the polymyxin B group. The multivariate COX analysis showed that the age was identified as independent predictor of 30-day mortality while CAZ/AVI therapy and central venous catheterization emerged as independent predictors of 30-day survival.
CAZ/AVI therapy was superior to polymyxin B therapy for patients with CRPA infection, and provided significant survival benefits, but further larger studies were needed to substantiate our findings.
头孢他啶/阿维巴坦(CAZ/AVI)单药治疗和基于多粘菌素B的联合治疗是目前耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌(CRPA)感染患者的两种治疗选择;然而,很少有研究对比这两种抗生素治疗方案的相对疗效。本研究的目的是比较CAZ/AVI和多粘菌素B治疗CRPA感染的有效性,并分析30天死亡率或生存率的独立预测因素。
本单中心回顾性观察性研究纳入了2018年1月至2020年12月期间接受CAZ/AVI或多粘菌素B治疗的CRPA感染患者。主要结局为14天和30天死亡率。次要结局为住院死亡率和细菌清除率。比较两组患者的基线特征和结局,并采用COX回归分析确定30天死亡率的预测因素。
共纳入136例CRPA感染患者,其中CAZ/AVI组51例,多粘菌素B组85例。CAZ/AVI组的14天死亡率(5.9%对27.1%,p = 0.002)、30天死亡率(13.7%对47.1%,p < 0.001)和住院死亡率(29.4%对60.0%,p = 0.001)均显著低于多粘菌素B组。CAZ/AVI组的细菌清除率(45.1%对12.9%,p < 0.001)高于多粘菌素B组。经倾向评分匹配调整后,CAZ/AVI组的30天死亡率仍低于多粘菌素B组(14.3%对42.9%,p = 0.018),细菌清除率高于多粘菌素B组(42.9%对14.3%,p = 0.018)。多因素COX分析显示,年龄被确定为30天死亡率的独立预测因素,而CAZ/AVI治疗和中心静脉置管是30天生存率的独立预测因素。
对于CRPA感染患者,CAZ/AVI治疗优于多粘菌素B治疗,并提供了显著的生存获益,但需要进一步的大型研究来证实我们的发现。