• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

练习引起的老年人手灵活性变化取决于初始钉板时间。

Practice-Induced Changes in Manual Dexterity of Older Adults Depend on Initial Pegboard Time.

机构信息

Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2023 Nov 1;55(11):2045-2052. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003245. Epub 2023 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1249/MSS.0000000000003245
PMID:37379250
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of our study was to determine the influence of practice on the pegboard times and peg-manipulation phases of older adults who were classified as having either slow or fast initial pegboard times.

METHODS

Participants ( n = 26, 70 ± 6.6 yr) completed two evaluation sessions and six practice sessions in which they performed 25 trials (5 blocks of 5 trials) of the grooved pegboard test. All practice sessions were supervised, and the time to complete each trial was recorded. In each evaluation session, the pegboard was mounted on a force transducer so that the downward force applied to the board could be measured.

RESULTS

Participants were stratified into two groups based on the initial time to complete the grooved pegboard test: a fast group (68.1 ± 6.0 s) and a slow group (89.6 ± 9.2 s). Both groups exhibited the classic two-phase profile (acquisition + consolidation) for learning a de novo motor skill. Despite the similar learning profile for the two groups, there were differences between groups in the phases of the peg-manipulation cycle that became faster with practice. The fast group seemed to reduce trajectory variability when transporting the peg, whereas the slow group seemed to exhibit both a decrease in trajectory variability and greater precision when inserting pegs into the holes.

CONCLUSIONS

The changes underlying practice-induced decreases in grooved pegboard time differed for older adults who initially had either a fast or a slow pegboard time.

摘要

简介

我们研究的目的是确定练习对老年人在使用叉式插板测试时的叉式插板时间和插板阶段的影响,这些老年人根据初始叉式插板时间的快慢被分为两组。

方法

参与者(n=26,70±6.6 岁)完成了两个评估阶段和六个练习阶段,在每个练习阶段中他们完成 25 次测试(5 个 5 次测试的组块)。所有的练习阶段都有监督,并且记录了完成每次测试的时间。在每个评估阶段,叉式插板都安装在力传感器上,以便可以测量施加在板上的向下力。

结果

参与者根据完成叉式插板测试的初始时间被分为两组:快组(68.1±6.0 s)和慢组(89.6±9.2 s)。两组都表现出学习新运动技能的典型两阶段模式(获得+巩固)。尽管两组的学习模式相似,但在练习过程中,插板操作周期的各个阶段的速度差异存在差异。快组在运输插板时似乎减少了轨迹的可变性,而慢组在将插板插入孔中时似乎不仅减少了轨迹的可变性,而且提高了准确性。

结论

对于初始叉式插板时间较快或较慢的老年人,练习引起的叉式插板时间减少的基础变化不同。

相似文献

1
Practice-Induced Changes in Manual Dexterity of Older Adults Depend on Initial Pegboard Time.练习引起的老年人手灵活性变化取决于初始钉板时间。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2023 Nov 1;55(11):2045-2052. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003245. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
2
Explaining the influence of practice on the grooved pegboard times of older adults: role of force steadiness.解释练习对老年人划销钉板时间的影响:力稳定性的作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2024 Aug;242(8):1971-1982. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06878-9. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
3
Peg-manipulation capabilities of middle-aged adults have a greater influence on pegboard times than those of young and old adults.中年成年人的插栓操作能力对插栓板测试时间的影响比年轻人和老年人更大。
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Aug;236(8):2165-2172. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5294-3. Epub 2018 May 22.
4
Peg-manipulation capabilities during a test of manual dexterity differ for persons with multiple sclerosis and healthy individuals.在一项手部灵活性测试中,多发性硬化症患者和健康个体的穿珠操作能力存在差异。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Nov;235(11):3487-3493. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5075-4. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
5
Poor estimates of motor variability are associated with longer grooved pegboard times for middle-aged and older adults.中老年人运动变异性的估计值较低与使用槽形钉板时间较长有关。
J Neurophysiol. 2019 Feb 1;121(2):588-601. doi: 10.1152/jn.00543.2018. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
6
The role of eye movements, attention, and hand movements on age-related differences in pegboard tests.眼球运动、注意力和手部运动对插板测试中与年龄相关的差异的作用。
J Neurophysiol. 2021 Nov 1;126(5):1710-1722. doi: 10.1152/jn.00629.2020. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
7
A framework for identifying the adaptations responsible for differences in pegboard times between middle-aged and older adults.用于识别导致中年和老年人在插板时间上差异的适应因素的框架。
Exp Gerontol. 2017 Oct 15;97:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
8
Force steadiness as a predictor of time to complete a pegboard test of dexterity in young men and women.力量稳定性作为年轻男性和女性完成灵巧性钉板测试所需时间的预测指标。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016 Jun 15;120(12):1410-7. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01051.2015. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
9
Intraindividual Variability Measurement of Fine Manual Motor Skills in Children Using an Electronic Pegboard: Cohort Study.个体内精细运动技能变异性测量:使用电子钉板的队列研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Aug 28;7(8):e12434. doi: 10.2196/12434.
10
Assessing dexterity function: a comparison of two alternatives for the NIH Toolbox.评估灵巧功能:NIH 工具包两种替代方案的比较。
J Hand Ther. 2011 Oct-Dec;24(4):313-20; quiz 321. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Explaining the influence of practice on the grooved pegboard times of older adults: role of force steadiness.解释练习对老年人划销钉板时间的影响:力稳定性的作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2024 Aug;242(8):1971-1982. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06878-9. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
2
Effects of plyometric training techniques on vertical jump performance of basketball players.增强式训练技术对篮球运动员垂直跳跃表现的影响。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2024 Jun;24(6):682-692. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.12097. Epub 2024 Mar 21.