Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Department of Medicine, Health, and Society, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2024 Jul 3;36(4):490-507. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2023.2226283. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
In 2004, California became the first state to require that employers provide paid family leave (PFL) to their employees. This paper examines the effect of California's PFL law on time spent caregiving to parents and to grandchildren by older adults aged 50-79. To identify the effect of the law, the paper uses the 1998-2016 waves of the Health and Retirement Study and a difference-in-differences approach comparing outcomes in California to other states before and after the implementation of the law. Results suggest that the law induced a switch in caregiving behavior with older adults spending less time caring for grandchildren and more time helping parents. Focusing on women, results further suggest that PFL affected older adults both through their own leave-taking and through reallocations of their caregiving time in response to leave-taking by new parents. The findings motivate thinking more broadly when calculating the costs and benefits of PFL policies; to the extent that California's PFL law enabled older adults to provide more care for their parents they otherwise would not have received, such an outcome represents an indirect benefit of the policy.
2004 年,加利福尼亚州成为第一个要求雇主为其员工提供带薪家庭休假(PFL)的州。本文考察了加利福尼亚州的 PFL 法对 50-79 岁老年人照顾父母和孙辈时间的影响。为了确定法律的效果,本文使用了 1998-2016 年健康与退休研究的各次调查数据,并采用双重差分法,将加利福尼亚州在该法实施前后的结果与其他州进行了比较。结果表明,该法引起了照顾行为的转变,老年人花在照顾孙辈上的时间减少,而花在帮助父母上的时间增加。进一步关注女性,结果表明 PFL 不仅通过自己的休假,而且通过新父母休假时对其照顾时间的重新分配,影响了老年人。这些发现促使人们在计算 PFL 政策的成本和收益时更全面地思考问题;在加利福尼亚州的 PFL 法使老年人能够为其父母提供更多的照顾,而这些父母本来可能得不到照顾的情况下,这种结果代表了该政策的间接收益。