University of Iowa.
Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University.
Milbank Q. 2024 Sep;102(3):732-764. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12708. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
Policy Points We examined the effect of the Paid Family Leave policy (PFL) and Paid Sick Leave policy (PSL) on care provision to older parents. We found that PSL adoption led to an increase in care provision, an effect mainly attributable to respondents in states/periods when PSL and PFL were concurrently offered. Some of the strongest effects were found among women and unpartnered adult children. PFL adoption by itself was not associated with care provision to parents except when PFL also offered job protection. Paid leave policies have heterogeneous effects on eldercare and their design and implementation should be carefully considered.
Family caregivers play a critical role in the American long-term care system. However, care responsibilities are known to potentially conflict with paid work, as about half of family caregivers are employed. The federal Family and Medical Leave Act passed by the US Congress in 1993 provides a nonuniversal, unpaid work benefit. In response, several states and localities have adopted the Paid Family Leave policy (PFL) and Paid Sick Leave policy (PSL) over the last two decades. Our objective is to examine the effect of these policies on the probability of personal care provision to older parents.
This study used longitudinal data from the Health and Retirement Study (1998-2020). Difference-in-differences regression models were estimated to examine associations between state- and local-level PFL and PSL mandates and personal care provision to older parents. We analyzed heterogeneous effects by the type of paid leave exposure (provision of job protection with PFL and availability of both PSL and PFL [with or without job protection] concurrently). We also examined results for different population subgroups.
PSL implementation was associated with a four- to five-percentage point increase in the probability of personal care provision. These effects were mainly attributable to respondents in states/periods when PSL and PFL were concurrently offered. The strongest effects were found among adult children who were employed at baseline, women, younger, unpartnered, and college educated. PFL implementation by itself was not associated with care provision to parents except when the policy also offered job protection.
Paid leave policies have heterogeneous impacts on personal care provision, potentially owing to differences in program features, variation in caregiving needs, and respondent characteristics. Overall, the results indicate that offering paid sick leave and paid family leave, when combined with job protection, could support potential family caregivers.
我们研究了带薪家庭休假政策(PFL)和带薪病假政策(PSL)对照顾老年父母的影响。我们发现,PSL 的采用导致照顾提供增加,这一效应主要归因于同时提供 PSL 和 PFL 的州/时期的受访者。在女性和未婚成年子女中发现了一些最强的效应。PFL 的采用本身与父母的照顾提供无关,除非 PFL 还提供工作保护。
家庭照顾者在美国长期护理系统中发挥着关键作用。然而,由于大约一半的家庭照顾者有工作,照顾责任已知可能与带薪工作相冲突。美国国会于 1993 年通过的《家庭和医疗休假法》提供了一项非普遍的、无薪的工作福利。作为回应,在过去的二十年里,几个州和地方通过了带薪家庭休假政策(PFL)和带薪病假政策(PSL)。我们的目的是研究这些政策对向老年父母提供个人照顾的概率的影响。
本研究使用了健康与退休研究(1998-2020 年)的纵向数据。采用差分差异回归模型来检验州和地方一级的 PFL 和 PSL 授权与向老年父母提供个人照顾之间的关联。我们通过带薪休假暴露的类型(PFL 提供工作保护和同时提供 PSL 和 PFL[有或没有工作保护])来分析异质效应。我们还为不同的人口亚组分析了结果。
PSL 的实施与个人照顾提供的概率增加了四到五个百分点有关。这些效应主要归因于同时提供 PSL 和 PFL 的州/时期的受访者。最强的效应出现在基线时就业的成年子女、女性、年轻、未婚和受过大学教育的子女中。PFL 的实施本身与父母的照顾提供无关,除非该政策还提供工作保护。
带薪休假政策对个人照顾提供有不同的影响,这可能是由于计划特点的差异、照顾需求的变化和受访者特征的不同。总的来说,结果表明,提供带薪病假和带薪家庭休假,同时提供工作保护,可以支持潜在的家庭照顾者。