Zadey Siddhesh, Iyer Himanshu, Nayan Anveshi, Shetty Ritika, Sonal Swati, Smith Emily R, Staton Catherine A, Fitzgerald Tamara N, Nickenig Vissoci Joao Ricardo
Association for Socially Applicable Research (ASAR), Pune, Maharashtra, 411007, India.
Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27707, USA.
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2023 Apr 5;13:100178. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100178. eCollection 2023 Jun.
For universal surgical, obstetric, trauma, and anesthesia care by 2030, the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery (LCoGS) suggested tracking six indicators. We reviewed academic and policy literature to investigate the current state of LCoGS indicators in India. There was limited primary data for access to timely essential surgery, risk of impoverishing and catastrophic health expenditures due to surgery, though some modeled estimates are present. Surgical specialist workforce estimates are heterogeneous across different levels of care, urban and rural areas, and diverse health sectors. Surgical volumes differ widely across demographic, socio-economic, and geographic cohorts. Perioperative mortality rates vary across procedures, diagnoses, and follow-up time periods. Available data suggest India falls short of achieving global targets. This review highlights the evidence gap for India's surgical care planning. India needs a systematic subnational mapping of indicators and adaptation of targets as per the country's health needs for equitable and sustainable planning.
为了在2030年实现普遍的外科、产科、创伤和麻醉护理,《柳叶刀》全球外科委员会(LCoGS)建议跟踪六个指标。我们查阅了学术和政策文献,以调查印度LCoGS指标的现状。虽然有一些模型估计,但关于及时获得基本外科手术、手术导致贫困和灾难性医疗支出风险的原始数据有限。不同护理级别、城乡地区以及不同卫生部门的外科专科劳动力估计存在差异。不同人口、社会经济和地理群体的手术量差异很大。围手术期死亡率因手术、诊断和随访时间段而异。现有数据表明,印度未能实现全球目标。本综述突出了印度外科护理规划方面的证据差距。印度需要对指标进行系统的次国家级映射,并根据该国的健康需求调整目标,以进行公平和可持续的规划。