Suppr超能文献

为低收入和中等收入国家的优先事项设定及知识转化提出“基于价值和证据的决策与实践”(VEDMAP)框架:马拉维等低收入和中等收入国家决策的新框架。

Proposing the "Value- and Evidence-Based decision making and Practice" (VEDMAP) framework for Priority-Setting and knowledge translation in low and Middle-Income Countries: A novel framework for Decision-Making in Low-and middle income countries like Malawi.

作者信息

Mfutso-Bengo Joseph, Nkungula Nthanda, Mnjowe Emmanuel, Ng'ambi Wingston, Jeremiah Faless, Kasende-Chinguwo Florence, Meckson Bickton Fanuel, Nkhoma Dominic, Chinkhumba Jobiba, Mboma Sebastian, Ngwira Lucky, Juma Mercy, Kazanga-Chiumia Isabel, Twea Pakwanja, Manthalu Gerald

机构信息

Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi.

Centre of Bioethics in Eastern and Southern Africa, Blantyre, Malawi.

出版信息

Health Policy Open. 2023 Apr 8;4:100094. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2023.100094. eCollection 2023 Dec.

Abstract

The existence and availability of evidence on its own does not guarantee that the evidence will be demanded and used by decision and policy makers. Decision and policy-makers, especially in low-income settings, often confront ethical dilemmas about determining the best available evidence and its utilization. This dilemma can be in the form of conflict of evidence, scientific and ethical equipoise and competing evidence or interests. Consequently, decisions are made based on convenience, personal preference, donor requirements, and political and social considerations which can result in wastage of resources and inefficiency. To mitigate these challenges, the use of "Value- and Evidence-Based Decision Making and Practice" (VEDMAP) framework is proposed. This framework was developed by Joseph Mfutso-Bengo in 2017 through a desk review. It was pretested through a scoping study under the (TLO) Project which assessed the feasibility and acceptability of using the VEDMAP as a priority setting tool for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in Malawi. The study used mixed methods whereby it conducted a desk review to map out and benchmark normative values of different countries in Africa and HTA; focus group discussion and key informant interviews to map out the actual (practised) values in Malawi. The results of this review confirmed that the use of VEDMAP framework was feasible and acceptable and can bring efficiency, traceability, transparency and integrity in decision- policy making process and implementation.

摘要

证据的存在和可得性本身并不能保证决策者会要求并使用这些证据。决策者,尤其是在低收入环境中的决策者,在确定最佳可得证据及其利用方面常常面临伦理困境。这种困境可能表现为证据冲突、科学与伦理的平衡以及相互竞争的证据或利益。因此,决策是基于便利性、个人偏好、捐助者要求以及政治和社会考虑做出的,这可能导致资源浪费和效率低下。为了应对这些挑战,建议使用“基于价值和证据的决策与实践”(VEDMAP)框架。该框架由约瑟夫·姆富特索 - 本戈于2017年通过案头审查制定。它在(TLO)项目的范围界定研究中进行了预测试,该研究评估了在马拉维将VEDMAP用作卫生技术评估(HTA)优先排序工具的可行性和可接受性。该研究采用了混合方法,通过案头审查来梳理和衡量非洲不同国家和卫生技术评估的规范价值;通过焦点小组讨论和关键信息访谈来梳理马拉维的实际(实践)价值。这次审查的结果证实,使用VEDMAP框架是可行且可接受的,并且可以在决策 - 政策制定过程及实施中带来效率、可追溯性、透明度和诚信。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd1c/10297823/bb162263559b/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验