Ferrante Gianluigi, Lanera Corrado
SSD epidemiologia screening, AOU Città della salute e della scienza di Torino, CPO Piemonte, Torino;
Unità di biostatistica, epidemiologia e sanità pubblica, Università degli studi di Padova.
Epidemiol Prev. 2023 May-Jun;47(3):203-207. doi: 10.19191/EP23.3.A639.051.
Using ChatGPT in scientific research offers revolutionary opportunities thanks to its natural language interaction capabilities and production of coherent and sophisticated text.Artificial intelligence can automate activities such as information synthesis and schematization, improving scientific communication and computer code writing.However, the lack of a complete understanding of context, the risk of spreading misleading information, and the possibility of plagiarism represent some of the biggest limitations in the current use of this technology.The role of human experience remains fundamental for in-depth understanding of context, exercising critical thinking, and ensuring respect for the ethical principles of scientific research.A responsible and aware use of tools such as ChatGPT can offer great benefits to the scientific community, but it is essential to remember that these tools are only a support and cannot replace human judgment and experience.
由于ChatGPT具有自然语言交互能力以及能够生成连贯且复杂的文本,在科学研究中使用它带来了革命性的机遇。人工智能可以使信息合成与系统化等活动自动化,改善科学交流和计算机代码编写。然而,对上下文缺乏全面理解、传播误导性信息的风险以及剽窃的可能性是当前这项技术使用中一些最大的局限。人类经验对于深入理解上下文、进行批判性思考以及确保尊重科学研究的伦理原则仍然至关重要。负责任且明智地使用ChatGPT等工具可为科学界带来巨大益处,但必须记住,这些工具仅仅是一种辅助,无法取代人类的判断和经验。