• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别对 MELD 评分为 40 的等待肝移植患者获得肝移植的影响。

Sex-based Disparities in Access to Liver Transplantation for Waitlisted Patients With Model for End-stage Liver Disease Score of 40.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2024 Jan 1;279(1):112-118. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005933. Epub 2023 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000005933
PMID:37389573
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association of sex with access to liver transplantation among candidates with the highest possible model for end-stage liver disease score (MELD 40).

BACKGROUND

Women with end-stage liver disease are less likely than men to receive liver transplantation due in part to MELD's underestimation of renal dysfunction in women. The extent of the sex-based disparity among patients with high disease severity and equally high MELD scores is unclear.

METHODS

Using national transplant registry data, we compared liver offer acceptance (offers received at match MELD 40) and waitlist outcomes (transplant vs death/delisting) by sex for 7654 waitlisted liver transplant candidates from 2009 to 2019 who reached MELD 40. Multivariable logistic and competing-risks regression was used to estimate the association of sex with the outcome and adjust for the candidate and donor factors.

RESULTS

Women (N = 3019, 39.4%) spent equal time active at MELD 40 (median: 5 vs 5 days, P = 0.28) but had lower offer acceptance (9.2% vs 11.0%, P < 0.01) compared with men (N = 4635, 60.6%). Adjusting for candidate/donor factors, offers to women were less likely accepted (odds ratio = 0.87, P < 0.01). Adjusting for candidate factors, once they reached MELD 40, women were less likely to be transplanted (subdistribution hazard ratio = 0.90, P < 0.01) and more likely to die or be delisted (subdistribution hazard ratio = 1.14, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Even among candidates with high disease severity and equally high MELD scores, women have reduced access to liver transplantation and worse outcomes compared with men. Policies addressing this disparity should consider factors beyond MELD score adjustments alone.

摘要

目的

确定在最高可能的终末期肝病模型评分(MELD40)的候选者中,性别与获得肝移植的关联。

背景

女性终末期肝病患者接受肝移植的可能性低于男性,部分原因是 MELD 低估了女性的肾功能不全。在疾病严重程度高且 MELD 评分同样高的患者中,性别差异的程度尚不清楚。

方法

利用国家移植登记数据,我们比较了 2009 年至 2019 年期间达到 MELD40 的 7654 名等待肝移植的候选者中,性别在肝移植接受(在匹配 MELD40 时收到的肝源)和等待名单结果(移植与死亡/退出)之间的差异。多变量逻辑和竞争风险回归用于估计性别与结果的关联,并调整候选者和供体因素。

结果

女性(N=3019,39.4%)在 MELD40 时的活跃时间相等(中位数:5 天对 5 天,P=0.28),但接受的肝源较少(9.2%对 11.0%,P<0.01)。调整候选者/供体因素后,女性获得的肝源不太可能被接受(比值比=0.87,P<0.01)。调整候选者因素后,一旦达到 MELD40,女性接受移植的可能性较小(亚分布风险比=0.90,P<0.01),死亡或被取消资格的可能性较大(亚分布风险比=1.14,P=0.02)。

结论

即使在疾病严重程度高且 MELD 评分同样高的候选者中,女性获得肝移植的机会也比男性少,结局也比男性差。解决这种差异的政策应考虑除 MELD 评分调整之外的因素。

相似文献

1
Sex-based Disparities in Access to Liver Transplantation for Waitlisted Patients With Model for End-stage Liver Disease Score of 40.性别对 MELD 评分为 40 的等待肝移植患者获得肝移植的影响。
Ann Surg. 2024 Jan 1;279(1):112-118. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005933. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
2
Sex and Size Disparities in Access to Liver Transplant for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.性别和大小差异在获得肝移植治疗肝细胞癌患者的机会。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Nov 1;159(11):1291-1298. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3498.
3
Reduced Access to Liver Transplantation in Women: Role of Height, MELD Exception Scores, and Renal Function Underestimation.女性接受肝移植的机会减少:身高、MELD 例外评分和肾功能低估的作用。
Transplantation. 2018 Oct;102(10):1710-1716. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002196.
4
Systematic Sex-Based Inequity in the MELD Score-Based Allocation System for Liver Transplantation in Germany.德国基于终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分的肝移植分配系统中存在基于性别的系统性不平等。
Transpl Int. 2025 Jan 29;38:13844. doi: 10.3389/ti.2025.13844. eCollection 2025.
5
Sex Disparity in Liver Transplant and Access to Living Donation.性别差异与肝移植和活体捐赠机会
JAMA Surg. 2021 Nov 1;156(11):1010-1017. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3586.
6
Disparities in liver transplantation before and after introduction of the MELD score.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分引入前后肝移植的差异。
JAMA. 2008 Nov 26;300(20):2371-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.720.
7
Outcomes for liver transplant candidates listed with low model for end-stage liver disease score.终末期肝病模型评分低的肝移植候选者的结局
Liver Transpl. 2015 Nov;21(11):1403-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.24307.
8
Quantifying Sex-Based Disparities in Liver Allocation.量化肝移植分配中的性别差异。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):e201129. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1129. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
9
Moderate ascites identifies patients with low model for end-stage liver disease scores awaiting liver transplantation who have a high mortality risk.中等量腹水可识别出等待肝移植的低终末期肝病模型评分患者,此类患者具有较高的死亡风险。
Liver Transpl. 2011 Feb;17(2):129-36. doi: 10.1002/lt.22218.
10
Analysis of Liver Offers to Pediatric Candidates on the Transplant Wait List.对移植等待名单上儿科候选者肝脏供体情况的分析。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Oct;153(4):988-995. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.06.053. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex-based disparities in liver transplantation: Evidence from a nationwide Italian cohort.肝移植中的性别差异:来自意大利全国队列的证据。
JHEP Rep. 2025 Mar 7;7(6):101387. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2025.101387. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Systematic Sex-Based Inequity in the MELD Score-Based Allocation System for Liver Transplantation in Germany.德国基于终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分的肝移植分配系统中存在基于性别的系统性不平等。
Transpl Int. 2025 Jan 29;38:13844. doi: 10.3389/ti.2025.13844. eCollection 2025.
3
Sex and Size Disparities in Access to Liver Transplant for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
性别和大小差异在获得肝移植治疗肝细胞癌患者的机会。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Nov 1;159(11):1291-1298. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3498.
4
Evaluating the Correlation Between Anteroposterior Diameter, Body Surface Area, and Height for Liver Transplant Donors and Recipients.评估肝移植供体和受体的前后径、体表面积与身高之间的相关性。
Transplant Direct. 2024 May 16;10(6):e1630. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001630. eCollection 2024 Jun.