• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性接受肝移植的机会减少:身高、MELD 例外评分和肾功能低估的作用。

Reduced Access to Liver Transplantation in Women: Role of Height, MELD Exception Scores, and Renal Function Underestimation.

机构信息

Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2018 Oct;102(10):1710-1716. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002196.

DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000002196
PMID:29620614
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6153066/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sex-based disparities in liver transplantation (LT) are incompletely understood. We assessed the role of height, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), MELD-Na, and exception points in the disparate access to LT.

METHODS

Adults waitlisted for LT at Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network between 2002 and 2013 were included. Covariates associated with likelihood of LT were analyzed by Cox proportional model. In a separate cohort of waitlisted adults with glomerular filtration rate measurement by iothalamate clearance (n = 611), we determined the number of creatinine-derived MELD points in men versus women, across all ranges of glomerular filtration rate. The impact of correcting the MELD score deficit in women on LT was modeled.

RESULTS

Among 90 720 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registrants, women had higher mortality than men (4 years after listing: 22% vs 18%, P < 0.0001), and lower likelihood of LT (49% vs 58%, P < 0.0001); women were 20% less likely to be transplanted (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.81). Differences in height and MELD exception scores accounted for most of the LT deficit in women (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-0.94). Women received between 1 and 2.4 fewer creatinine-derived MELD points than men with similar renal dysfunction. MELD-Na worsened the gender disparity. Addition of 1 or 2 MELD points to women significantly impacted LT access.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in height and MELD exception points explained most of the sex-based disparity in LT. Additionally, MELD score underestimated disease severity in women by up to 2.4 points and MELD Na exacerbated this disparity. The degree of underestimation based on MELD had significant impact on allocation.

摘要

背景

肝移植(LT)中存在基于性别的差异,但这种差异的原因尚不完全清楚。本研究旨在评估身高、终末期肝病模型(MELD)、MELD-Na 和例外积分在 LT 机会差异中的作用。

方法

本研究纳入了 2002 年至 2013 年期间在器官获取和移植网络(Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network)登记接受 LT 的成年人。采用 Cox 比例模型分析与 LT 可能性相关的协变量。在另一组接受碘酞酸盐清除率测定肾小球滤过率(glomerular filtration rate,GFR)的登记成年人队列中(n=611),我们确定了所有 GFR 范围内男性和女性之间肌酐衍生 MELD 点的数量。还对女性 MELD 评分缺陷的校正对 LT 的影响进行了建模。

结果

在 90720 名器官获取和移植网络登记人中,女性的死亡率高于男性(列入名单后 4 年:22% vs. 18%,P<0.0001),LT 的可能性也较低(49% vs. 58%,P<0.0001);女性的移植率低 20%(风险比,0.80;95%置信区间,0.78-0.81)。身高和 MELD 例外评分的差异解释了女性 LT 不足的大部分原因(风险比,0.91;95%置信区间,0.89-0.94)。女性的肌酐衍生 MELD 点比肾功能相似的男性少 1-2.4 个。MELD-Na 使性别差异恶化。女性增加 1 或 2 个 MELD 点显著影响 LT 的机会。

结论

身高和 MELD 例外评分的差异解释了 LT 中基于性别的差异的大部分原因。此外,MELD 评分对女性疾病严重程度的低估最多可达 2.4 分,MELD-Na 加剧了这种差异。基于 MELD 的低估程度对分配有重大影响。

相似文献

1
Reduced Access to Liver Transplantation in Women: Role of Height, MELD Exception Scores, and Renal Function Underestimation.女性接受肝移植的机会减少:身高、MELD 例外评分和肾功能低估的作用。
Transplantation. 2018 Oct;102(10):1710-1716. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002196.
2
Sex Disparity in Liver Transplant and Access to Living Donation.性别差异与肝移植和活体捐赠机会
JAMA Surg. 2021 Nov 1;156(11):1010-1017. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3586.
3
Gender, renal function, and outcomes on the liver transplant waiting list: assessment of revised MELD including estimated glomerular filtration rate.性别、肾功能和肝移植等待名单上的结局:评估包括估算肾小球滤过率的改良 MELD。
J Hepatol. 2011 Mar;54(3):462-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.07.015. Epub 2010 Sep 19.
4
Quantifying Sex-Based Disparities in Liver Allocation.量化肝移植分配中的性别差异。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):e201129. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1129. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
5
Wait-list mortality of young patients with Biliary atresia: Competing risk analysis of a eurotransplant registry-based cohort.胆道闭锁年轻患者的候补名单死亡率:基于欧洲器官移植登记处队列的竞争风险分析。
Liver Transpl. 2018 Jun;24(6):810-819. doi: 10.1002/lt.25025.
6
Gender disparity in liver transplant waiting-list mortality: the importance of kidney function.性别在肝移植等待名单死亡率中的差异:肾功能的重要性。
Liver Transpl. 2010 Oct;16(10):1147-57. doi: 10.1002/lt.22121.
7
Increasing Liver Transplantation Wait-List Dropout for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Widening Geographical Disparities: Implications for Organ Allocation.肝癌导致肝移植候补者不断退出,且地域差异不断扩大:对器官分配的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2018 Oct;24(10):1346-1356. doi: 10.1002/lt.25317.
8
Impact of creatinine values on MELD scores in male and female candidates for liver transplantation.肌酐值对男性和女性肝移植候选者 MELD 评分的影响。
Ann Hepatol. 2013 May-Jun;12(3):434-9.
9
Intraregional model for end-stage liver disease score variation in liver transplantation: Disparity in our own backyard.肝移植中区域性终末期肝病模型评分差异:自家后院的差异。
Liver Transpl. 2018 Apr;24(4):488-496. doi: 10.1002/lt.25021.
10
Region 11 MELD Na exception prospective study.11 区 MELD Na 例外前瞻性研究。
Ann Hepatol. 2012 Jan-Feb;11(1):62-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Update on Organ Allocation and Liver Transplantation.器官分配与肝移植的最新进展
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2025 Jul;21(7):424-430.
2
Disparities in liver transplantation for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis-associated hepatocellular carcinoma.代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝炎相关肝细胞癌肝移植的差异
World J Transplant. 2025 Sep 18;15(3):101997. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i3.101997.
3
Sex Differences in Excess Mortality Among Waitlisted Kidney, Heart, and Liver Transplant Candidates.等待肾、心脏和肝脏移植的候选者中过高死亡率的性别差异。

本文引用的文献

1
Deceased-Donor Liver Size and the Sex-Based Disparity in Liver Transplantation.已故供体肝脏大小与肝移植中的性别差异
Transplantation. 2017 Nov;101(11):e329. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001898.
2
Impact of estimated liver volume and liver weight on gender disparity in liver transplantation.估计肝体积和肝重量对肝移植中性别差异的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2013 Jan;19(1):89-95. doi: 10.1002/lt.23553. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
3
Increasing disparity in waitlist mortality rates with increased model for end-stage liver disease scores for candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma versus candidates without hepatocellular carcinoma.
Transplant Direct. 2025 Aug 22;11(9):e1856. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001856. eCollection 2025 Sep.
4
Sex Differences in Risk of Adverse Liver Events in Patients With Cirrhosis.肝硬化患者不良肝脏事件风险的性别差异
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2523674. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.23674.
5
The unwell patient with advanced chronic liver disease: when to use each score?患有晚期慢性肝病的不适患者:何时使用每种评分?
BMC Med. 2025 Jul 9;23(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04185-w.
6
Sex and gender disparities in hepatocellular carcinoma: insights into risk, diagnosis, and therapeutic outcomes.肝细胞癌中的性别差异:对风险、诊断和治疗结果的见解。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s12094-025-03965-3.
7
Challenges and Future Perspectives for Artificial Intelligence in Hepatology: Breaking Barriers for Better Care.肝病学中人工智能的挑战与未来展望:突破障碍,实现更好的治疗。
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2025 Sep-Oct;15(5):102579. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2025.102579. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
8
Sex-based disparities in liver transplantation: Evidence from a nationwide Italian cohort.肝移植中的性别差异:来自意大利全国队列的证据。
JHEP Rep. 2025 Mar 7;7(6):101387. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2025.101387. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Sex-based Differences and Comparative Predictive Value of MELD 3.0 in Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation Waitlist Outcomes After Standardization of Listing Criteria in the United States.美国肝脏移植标准统一后,肝肾联合移植等待名单结果中基于性别的差异及MELD 3.0的比较预测价值
Transplant Direct. 2025 Apr 9;11(5):e1781. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001781. eCollection 2025 May.
10
Global trends in artificial intelligence applications in liver disease over seventeen years.十七年来人工智能在肝病领域应用的全球趋势
World J Hepatol. 2025 Mar 27;17(3):101721. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i3.101721.
肝癌患者与非肝癌患者的终末期肝病模型评分增加导致等待名单死亡率差异增大。
Liver Transpl. 2012 Apr;18(4):434-43. doi: 10.1002/lt.23394.
4
MELD Exceptions and Rates of Waiting List Outcomes.MELD 例外和候补名单结果的比例。
Am J Transplant. 2011 Nov;11(11):2362-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03735.x. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
5
Sex-based disparities in liver transplant rates in the United States.美国肝移植率的性别差异。
Am J Transplant. 2011 Jul;11(7):1435-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03498.x.
6
Gender, renal function, and outcomes on the liver transplant waiting list: assessment of revised MELD including estimated glomerular filtration rate.性别、肾功能和肝移植等待名单上的结局:评估包括估算肾小球滤过率的改良 MELD。
J Hepatol. 2011 Mar;54(3):462-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.07.015. Epub 2010 Sep 19.
7
Height contributes to the gender difference in wait-list mortality under the MELD-based liver allocation system.身高是 MELD 为基础的肝移植分配系统中导致等待名单死亡率存在性别差异的原因之一。
Am J Transplant. 2010 Dec;10(12):2658-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03326.x. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
8
Gender disparity in liver transplant waiting-list mortality: the importance of kidney function.性别在肝移植等待名单死亡率中的差异:肾功能的重要性。
Liver Transpl. 2010 Oct;16(10):1147-57. doi: 10.1002/lt.22121.
9
Hepatocellular carcinoma patients are advantaged in the current liver transplant allocation system.肝细胞癌患者在当前的肝移植分配系统中具有优势。
Am J Transplant. 2010 Jul;10(7):1643-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03127.x. Epub 2010 May 10.
10
Sociodemographic differences in early access to liver transplantation services.早期获得肝移植服务方面的社会人口统计学差异。
Am J Transplant. 2009 Sep;9(9):2092-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02737.x. Epub 2009 Jul 23.