• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种混合方法,用于评估在联邦合格健康中心实施的高血压管理计划的实施过程和项目成本。

A Mixed-Methods Approach for Evaluating Implementation Processes and Program Costs for a Hypertension Management Program Implemented in a Federally Qualified Health Center.

机构信息

Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, GA, 30341, Atlanta, USA.

Health Care Evaluation Department, NORC at the University of Chicago, 4350 East-West Highway, 8th Floor, MD, 20814, Bethesda, USA.

出版信息

Prev Sci. 2024 Apr;25(Suppl 1):10-21. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01529-x. Epub 2023 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1007/s11121-023-01529-x
PMID:37389780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11133121/
Abstract

Team-based care approaches are effective at improving hypertension control and have been used in clinical practice to improve hypertension outcomes. This study implemented and evaluated the Hypertension Management Program (HMP), which was originally developed in a high-resource health setting, in a health system with fewer resources and a patient population disproportionately affected by hypertension. Our objectives were to describe how a health system could adapt HMP to meet their needs and calculate total program costs. HMP uses a team-based, patient-centered approach involving clinical pharmacists who contribute to managing patients who have hypertension and ultimately preventing premature death due to uncontrolled hypertension. HMP has 10 components (e.g., EHR patient registries and outreach lists, no copayment walk-in blood pressure checks). Our project involved implementing the key components of HMP in a federally qualified health center (FQHC) in South Carolina. Adaptations from the key components of HMP were made to fit the participants' settings. A mixed-methods evaluation assessed implementation processes, program costs, and implementation facilitators and barriers. From September 2018 to December 2019, clinical pharmacists conducted 758 hypertension management visits (HMVs) with 316 patients with hypertension. Total program costs for HMP were $325,532 overall and $16,277 per month. Monthly cost per patient was $3.62. The high engagement among clinical pharmacists, along with provider engagements, followed up by the subsequent referral of patients to HMP, facilitated the implementation process. Staff members observed improvements in hypertension control, which increased participation buy-in. Barriers included staff turnover, the perception among some providers that HMP took too much time, as well as perception of HMP as a pharmacy-specific initiative. A team-based, patient-centered approach to hypertension management can be adapted for FQHCs or similar settings that serve patient populations disproportionately affected by hypertension.

摘要

基于团队的护理方法在改善高血压控制方面非常有效,并已在临床实践中用于改善高血压的治疗效果。本研究实施并评估了高血压管理计划(HMP),该计划最初是在资源丰富的医疗环境中开发的,然后在资源较少的医疗系统中进行实施,该系统的患者人群中高血压的发病率不成比例。我们的目标是描述医疗系统如何适应 HMP 以满足其需求,并计算总计划成本。HMP 采用以团队为基础、以患者为中心的方法,涉及临床药师,他们参与管理患有高血压的患者,并最终预防因高血压未得到控制而导致的过早死亡。HMP 有 10 个组成部分(例如,EHR 患者登记册和外展清单,无需共付额即可进行血压检查)。我们的项目涉及在南卡罗来纳州的一家合格的联邦健康中心(FQHC)中实施 HMP 的关键组成部分。对 HMP 的关键组成部分进行了调整,以适应参与者的环境。采用混合方法评估了实施过程、计划成本以及实施的促进因素和障碍。从 2018 年 9 月至 2019 年 12 月,临床药师共为 316 名高血压患者进行了 758 次高血压管理就诊(HMV)。HMP 的总计划成本为 325532 美元,每月 16277 美元。每位患者的月成本为 3.62 美元。临床药师的高度参与度,以及医疗服务提供者的参与度,随后是将患者转诊到 HMP,促进了实施过程。工作人员观察到高血压控制的改善,这增加了参与度。障碍包括员工流失、一些医疗服务提供者认为 HMP 花费太多时间,以及将 HMP 视为特定于药房的举措的看法。以团队为基础、以患者为中心的高血压管理方法可以适应服务于高血压发病率不成比例的患者人群的 FQHC 或类似环境。

相似文献

1
A Mixed-Methods Approach for Evaluating Implementation Processes and Program Costs for a Hypertension Management Program Implemented in a Federally Qualified Health Center.一种混合方法,用于评估在联邦合格健康中心实施的高血压管理计划的实施过程和项目成本。
Prev Sci. 2024 Apr;25(Suppl 1):10-21. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01529-x. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
2
Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Patient-Centered, Nonphysician Led Self-Monitoring Blood Pressure Program in a Rural Federally Qualified Health Center.评估在农村联邦合格健康中心实施以患者为中心、非医师主导的自我监测血压项目的效果。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2024;30:S167-S174. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001937. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
3
Effectiveness evaluation of a hypertension management program in a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC).联邦合格医疗中心(FQHC)高血压管理项目的效果评估
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Jun 5;34:102271. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102271. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Implementing Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring With Clinical Support: A Qualitative Study of Federally Qualified Health Centers.实施有临床支持的自我血压监测:联邦合格健康中心的定性研究。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2024;30:S107-S115. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001894. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
5
"Hypertension is such a difficult disease to manage": federally qualified health center staff- and leadership-perceived readiness to implement a technology-facilitated team-based hypertension model.“高血压是一种极难控制的疾病”:联邦合格健康中心的工作人员和领导层对实施以技术为辅助的团队式高血压管理模式的认知准备情况
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 May 2;5(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00587-8.
6
Determinants of Bluetooth-Enabled Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring in Federally Qualified Health Centers.蓝牙功能自我血压监测在联邦合格健康中心的决定因素。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241229921. doi: 10.1177/21501319241229921.
7
Provider survey of the roles of clinical pharmacists in primary care in a Federally Qualified Health Center versus an Accountable Care Organization.针对联邦合格健康中心与责任医疗组织中临床药师在初级保健中的作用的提供者调查。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023 Mar 21;9:100242. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100242. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
Barriers to and facilitators of implementing colorectal cancer screening evidence-based interventions in federally qualified health centers: a qualitative study.在联邦合格健康中心实施结直肠癌筛查循证干预的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 10;24(1):797. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11163-0.
9
Using a Cohort-Based Quality Improvement Coaching Model to Optimize Chronic Disease Management for Federally Qualified Health Center Patients.利用基于队列的质量改进辅导模型来优化联邦合格健康中心患者的慢性病管理。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2024;30:S52-S61. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001902. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
10
Facilitators and Barriers to the Implementation of the HPV VACs (Vaccinate Adolescents Against Cancers) Program: A Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research Analysis.促进和阻碍 HPV 疫苗(青少年癌症疫苗接种)计划实施的因素:实施研究分析的综合框架。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Jul 3;16:E85. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180406.

引用本文的文献

1
A National Approach to Promoting Health Equity in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Implementation Science Strengths, Opportunities, and a Changing Chronic Disease Context.国家促进心血管疾病预防健康公平的方法:实施科学的优势、机遇和不断变化的慢性病环境。
Prev Sci. 2024 Apr;25(Suppl 1):190-194. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01585-3. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
2
Preventing and Managing Chronic Disease Through Implementation Science: Editor's Introduction to the Supplemental Issue.通过实施科学预防和管理慢性病:特刊编辑引言
Prev Sci. 2024 Apr;25(Suppl 1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01617-y. Epub 2023 Dec 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Pharmacists in Federally Qualified Health Centers: Models of Care to Improve Chronic Disease.合格的联邦健康中心的药剂师:改善慢性病的护理模式。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Nov 21;16:E153. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.190163.
2
Adapting and Evaluating a Health System Intervention From Kaiser Permanente to Improve Hypertension Management and Control in a Large Network of Safety-Net Clinics.调整并评估凯撒医疗集团的一项卫生系统干预措施,以改善大型安全网诊所网络中的高血压管理与控制情况。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Jul;11(7):e004386. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004386.
3
Cumulative Incidence of Hypertension by 55 Years of Age in Blacks and Whites: The CARDIA Study.
55 岁时黑人和白人高血压的累积发病率:CARDIA 研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jul 11;7(14):e007988. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007988.
4
Trends in Healthcare Expenditures Among US Adults With Hypertension: National Estimates, 2003-2014.美国成年人高血压医疗支出趋势:2003-2014 年全国估计数。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 May 30;7(11):e008731. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008731.
5
The effect of health insurance coverage and the doctor-patient relationship on health care utilization in high poverty neighborhoods.医疗保险覆盖范围及医患关系对高贫困社区医疗保健利用的影响。
Prev Med Rep. 2017 Jun 15;7:158-161. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.06.002. eCollection 2017 Sep.
6
Population Care Management and Team-Based Approach to Reduce Racial Disparities among African Americans/Blacks with Hypertension.人口护理管理与基于团队的方法以减少非裔美国人/黑人高血压患者中的种族差异。
Perm J. 2016 Winter;20(1):53-9. doi: 10.7812/TPP/15-052.
7
Economics of Team-based Care in Controlling Blood Pressure: A Community Guide Systematic Review.团队式护理控制血压的经济学:社区指南系统评价
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Nov;49(5):772-783. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.003.
8
Social Determinants of Risk and Outcomes for Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.心血管疾病风险与预后的社会决定因素:美国心脏协会科学声明
Circulation. 2015 Sep 1;132(9):873-98. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000228. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
9
Socioeconomic status and hypertension: a meta-analysis.社会经济地位与高血压:一项荟萃分析。
J Hypertens. 2015 Feb;33(2):221-9. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000428.
10
Team-based care and improved blood pressure control: a community guide systematic review.基于团队的护理与改善血压控制:社区指南系统评价
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jul;47(1):86-99. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Jun 2.