• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调整并评估凯撒医疗集团的一项卫生系统干预措施,以改善大型安全网诊所网络中的高血压管理与控制情况。

Adapting and Evaluating a Health System Intervention From Kaiser Permanente to Improve Hypertension Management and Control in a Large Network of Safety-Net Clinics.

作者信息

Fontil Valy, Gupta Reena, Moise Nathalie, Chen Ellen, Guzman David, McCulloch Charles E, Bibbins-Domingo Kirsten

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital (V.F., R.G., D.G., K.B.-D.)

University of California San Francisco. UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital (V.F., D.G., K.B.-D.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Jul;11(7):e004386. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004386.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004386
PMID:30002140
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6071320/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nearly half of Americans with diagnosed hypertension have uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) while some integrated healthcare systems, such as Kaiser Permanente Northern California, have achieved control rates upwards 90%.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We adapted Kaiser Permanente's evidence-based treatment protocols in a racially and ethnically diverse population at 12 safety-net clinics in the San Francisco Health Network. The intervention consisted of 4 elements: a hypertension registry, a simplified treatment intensification protocol that included fixed-dose combination medications containing diuretics, standardized BP measurement protocol, and BP check visits led by registered nurse and pharmacist staff. The study population comprised patients with hypertension who made ≥1 primary care visits within the past 24 months (n=15 917) and had a recorded BP measurement within the past 12 months. We conducted a postintervention time series analysis from August 2014 to August 2016 to assess the effect of the intervention on BP control for 24 months for the pilot site and for 15 months for 11 other San Francisco Health Network clinics combined. Secondary outcomes were changes in use of guideline-recommended medication prescribing. Rates of BP control increased at the pilot site (68%-74%; <0.01) and the 11 other San Francisco Health Network clinic sites (69%-74%; <0.01). Statistically significant improvements in BP control rates (<0.01) at the 11 San Francisco Health Network clinic sites occurred in all racial and ethnic groups (blacks, 60%-66%; whites, 69%-75%; Latinos, 67%-72%; Asians, 78%-82%). Use of fixed-dose combination medications increased from 10% to 13% (<0.01), and the percentage of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor prescriptions dispensed in combination with a thiazide diuretic increased from 36% to 40% (<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based system approaches to improving BP control can be implemented in safety-net settings and could play a pivotal role in achieving improved population BP control and reducing hypertension disparities.

摘要

背景

近一半被诊断为高血压的美国人血压未得到控制,而一些综合医疗系统,如北加利福尼亚凯撒医疗集团,已实现了90%以上的控制率。

方法与结果

我们在旧金山医疗网络的12家安全网诊所中,针对不同种族和民族的人群采用了凯撒医疗集团基于证据的治疗方案。干预措施包括4个要素:高血压登记册、简化的治疗强化方案(包括含利尿剂的固定剂量复方药物)、标准化血压测量方案以及由注册护士和药剂师工作人员主导的血压检查就诊。研究人群包括在过去24个月内进行过≥1次初级保健就诊(n = 15917)且在过去12个月内有血压测量记录的高血压患者。我们在2014年8月至2016年8月期间进行了干预后时间序列分析,以评估该干预措施对试点站点24个月以及旧金山医疗网络其他11家诊所联合15个月的血压控制效果。次要结局是指南推荐药物处方使用情况的变化。试点站点的血压控制率有所提高(从68%提高到74%;P<0.01),旧金山医疗网络其他11家诊所站点也如此(从69%提高到74%;P<0.01)。旧金山医疗网络11家诊所站点的所有种族和民族群体(黑人,从60%提高到66%;白人,从69%提高到75%;拉丁裔,从67%提高到72%;亚裔,从78%提高到82%)的血压控制率均有统计学显著改善(P<0.01)。固定剂量复方药物的使用从10%增加到13%(P<0.01),血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与噻嗪类利尿剂联合配药的百分比从36%增加到40%(P<0.01)。

结论

基于证据的改善血压控制的系统方法可在安全网环境中实施,并且在实现人群血压控制改善和减少高血压差异方面可能发挥关键作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd3/6071320/1418ddc688fd/nihms-974573-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd3/6071320/1418ddc688fd/nihms-974573-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd3/6071320/1418ddc688fd/nihms-974573-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Adapting and Evaluating a Health System Intervention From Kaiser Permanente to Improve Hypertension Management and Control in a Large Network of Safety-Net Clinics.调整并评估凯撒医疗集团的一项卫生系统干预措施,以改善大型安全网诊所网络中的高血压管理与控制情况。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Jul;11(7):e004386. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004386.
2
Study protocol: the Adherence and Intensification of Medications (AIM) study--a cluster randomized controlled effectiveness study.研究方案:依从性和药物强化(AIM)研究——一项集群随机对照有效性研究。
Trials. 2010 Oct 12;11:95. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-95.
3
Improving blood pressure control through a clinical pharmacist outreach program in patients with diabetes mellitus in 2 high-performing health systems: the adherence and intensification of medications cluster randomized, controlled pragmatic trial.通过在 2 个高绩效医疗系统中对患有糖尿病的患者开展临床药师外展项目来改善血压控制:药物依从性和强化治疗群组随机、对照实用试验。
Circulation. 2012 Jun 12;125(23):2863-72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.089169. Epub 2012 May 8.
4
Association of Differences in Treatment Intensification, Missed Visits, and Scheduled Follow-up Interval With Racial or Ethnic Disparities in Blood Pressure Control.治疗强化程度、就诊失约和规定随访间隔方面的差异与血压控制方面的种族或民族差异之间的关联。
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Feb 1;7(2):204-212. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.4996.
5
Evaluation of an Academic-Community Partnership to Implement MTM Services in Rural Communities to Improve Pharmaceutical Care for Patients with Diabetes and/or Hypertension.评价学术-社区伙伴关系在农村社区实施药物治疗管理服务以改善糖尿病和/或高血压患者的药物治疗
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Feb;24(2):132-141. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.2.132.
6
Ten-Year Review of Antihypertensive Prescribing Practices After Stroke and the Associated Disparities From the Florida Stroke Registry.佛罗里达卒中登记研究:卒中后抗高血压药物处方实践十年回顾及其相关差异
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Nov 21;12(22):e030272. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030272. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
7
A pharmacist based intervention to improve the care of patients with CKD: a pragmatic, randomized, controlled trial.一项基于药剂师的干预措施以改善慢性肾脏病患者的护理:一项实用、随机、对照试验。
BMC Nephrol. 2015 Apr 16;16:56. doi: 10.1186/s12882-015-0052-2.
8
Impact of a Primary Care CKD Registry in a US Public Safety-Net Health Care Delivery System: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial.美国公共保障医疗服务系统中基于初级保健的慢性肾脏病登记研究:一项实用随机试验
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Aug;72(2):168-177. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.01.058. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
9
Sustainability of Blood Pressure Reduction in Black Barbershops.黑人理发店中血压降低的可持续性。
Circulation. 2019 Jan 2;139(1):10-19. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038165.
10
Improved blood pressure control associated with a large-scale hypertension program.大规模高血压项目与血压控制改善相关。
JAMA. 2013 Aug 21;310(7):699-705. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.108769.

引用本文的文献

1
Community intervention to reduce cardiovascular disease in Chicago (CIRCL-Chicago): protocol for a type 3 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study using a parallel cluster-randomized trial design.芝加哥社区干预降低心血管疾病风险研究(CIRCL-芝加哥):一项采用平行整群随机试验设计的3型混合效果-实施研究方案
Implement Sci. 2025 May 5;20(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01431-w.
2
Improving Blood Pressure in High-Risk Patients With CKD Using an Interdisciplinary Remote Hypertension Program.通过跨学科远程高血压项目改善高危慢性肾脏病患者的血压
Kidney Int Rep. 2025 Jan 27;10(4):1101-1110. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2025.01.028. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Telemedicine Booths for Screening Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Prospective Multicenter Study.用于筛查心血管危险因素的远程医疗亭:前瞻性多中心研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Apr 22;12:e57032. doi: 10.2196/57032.
4
Championing Hypertension Remote Monitoring for Equity and Dissemination (CHARMED): A multi-site factorial randomized controlled trial protocol.倡导高血压远程监测促进公平与传播(CHARMED):一项多中心析因随机对照试验方案
Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 May;152:107879. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2025.107879. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
5
Unlocking health equity by eliminating copayments for essential antihypertensive medications.通过消除基本降压药物的自付费用来实现健康公平。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jan 30;81:103094. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103094. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
Closing the Gap: Digital Innovations to Address Hypertension Disparities.缩小差距:应对高血压差异的数字创新
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025 Jan 15;27(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02171-x.
7
implementation of healthy heart ambassador to improve blood pressure control at community health centers in Texas.实施健康心脏大使计划,以改善德克萨斯州社区卫生中心的血压控制状况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 20;24(1):1105. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11485-z.
8
Hypertension control and risk of age-associated dementia in people with HIV infection.HIV感染者的高血压控制与年龄相关性痴呆风险
AIDS. 2025 Jan 1;39(1):85-90. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000004017. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
9
Achieving Equity in Hypertension: A Review of Current Efforts by the American Heart Association.实现高血压治疗中的公平性:美国心脏协会当前努力的综述。
Hypertension. 2024 Nov;81(11):2218-2227. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.20533. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
10
Design and Implementation of an Electronic Health Record-Integrated Hypertension Management Application.电子健康记录整合型高血压管理应用的设计与实现。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jan 16;13(2):e030884. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030884.

本文引用的文献

1
Race-ethnicity on blood pressure control after ischemic stroke: a prospective cohort study.缺血性卒中后血压控制的种族-族裔差异:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2017 Jan;11(1):38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
2
Management of Hypertension in Primary Care Safety-Net Clinics in the United States: A Comparison of Community Health Centers and Private Physicians' Offices.美国基层医疗安全网诊所的高血压管理:社区健康中心与私人医生诊所的比较
Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr;52(2):807-825. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12516. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
3
Simulating Strategies for Improving Control of Hypertension Among Patients with Usual Source of Care in the United States: The Blood Pressure Control Model.美国常规医疗来源患者中改善高血压控制的模拟策略:血压控制模型
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Aug;30(8):1147-55. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3231-8. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
4
Cost-effectiveness of hypertension therapy according to 2014 guidelines.根据2014年指南的高血压治疗成本效益
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 29;372(5):447-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1406751.
5
Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in hypertension prevention and control: what will it take to translate research into practice and policy?减少高血压预防与控制方面的种族和族裔差异:将研究转化为实践和政策需要付出什么?
Am J Hypertens. 2015 Jun;28(6):699-716. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpu233. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
6
Counseling African Americans to Control Hypertension: cluster-randomized clinical trial main effects.非裔美国人高血压控制咨询:集群随机临床试验主要效应。
Circulation. 2014 May 20;129(20):2044-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006650. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
7
2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8).2014 年成人高血压管理的循证指南:第八届联合国家委员会(JNC 8)任命的专家组报告。
JAMA. 2014 Feb 5;311(5):507-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.284427.
8
Protocol-based treatment of hypertension: a critical step on the pathway to progress.基于方案的高血压治疗:迈向进展之路的关键一步。
JAMA. 2014 Jan 1;311(1):21-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282615.
9
Improved blood pressure control associated with a large-scale hypertension program.大规模高血压项目与血压控制改善相关。
JAMA. 2013 Aug 21;310(7):699-705. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.108769.
10
Dynamic view on affordability of fixed-dose combination antihypertensive drug therapy.动态视角下固定剂量复方降压药物治疗的可负担性。
Am J Hypertens. 2013 Jul;26(7):879-87. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpt035. Epub 2013 Mar 18.