Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.
Blood. 2023 Aug 24;142(8):687-699. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022018818.
ELEVATE-RR demonstrated noninferior progression-free survival and lower incidence of key adverse events (AEs) with acalabrutinib vs ibrutinib in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. We further characterize AEs of acalabrutinib and ibrutinib via post hoc analysis. Overall and exposure-adjusted incidence rate was assessed for common Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor-associated AEs and for selected events of clinical interest (ECIs). AE burden scores based on previously published methodology were calculated for AEs overall and selected ECIs. Safety analyses included 529 patients (acalabrutinib, n = 266; ibrutinib, n = 263). Among common AEs, incidences of any-grade diarrhea, arthralgia, urinary tract infection, back pain, muscle spasms, and dyspepsia were higher with ibrutinib, with 1.5- to 4.1-fold higher exposure-adjusted incidence rates. Incidences of headache and cough were higher with acalabrutinib, with 1.6- and 1.2-fold higher exposure-adjusted incidence rate, respectively. Among ECIs, incidences of any-grade atrial fibrillation/flutter, hypertension, and bleeding were higher with ibrutinib, as were exposure-adjusted incidence rates (2.0-, 2.8-, and 1.6-fold, respectively); incidences of cardiac events overall (the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities system organ class) and infections were similar between arms. Rate of discontinuation because of AEs was lower for acalabrutinib (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.93). AE burden score was higher for ibrutinib vs acalabrutinib overall and for the ECIs atrial fibrillation/flutter, hypertension, and bleeding. A limitation of this analysis is its open-label study design, which may influence the reporting of more subjective AEs. Overall, event-based analyses and AE burden scores demonstrated higher AE burden overall and specifically for atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and hemorrhage with ibrutinib vs acalabrutinib. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02477696.
ELEVATE-RR 研究表明,在既往接受治疗的慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者中,阿卡替尼对比伊布替尼可带来非劣效的无进展生存期(PFS),且关键不良事件(AE)发生率更低。我们通过事后分析进一步对阿卡替尼和伊布替尼的 AE 特征进行了描述。采用常见布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(BTKi)相关 AE 和临床关注事件(ECI)的暴露调整发生率评估了整体和暴露调整的发生率。采用之前发表的方法学计算了基于 AE 和特定 ECI 的 AE 负担评分。安全性分析包括 529 例患者(阿卡替尼组 n=266;伊布替尼组 n=263)。在常见 AE 中,伊布替尼组腹泻、关节痛、尿路感染、背痛、肌肉痉挛和消化不良的发生率更高,暴露调整发生率高 1.5-4.1 倍。阿卡替尼组头痛和咳嗽的发生率更高,暴露调整发生率分别高 1.6-1.2 倍。在 ECI 中,伊布替尼组的任何等级心房颤动/扑动、高血压和出血发生率更高,暴露调整发生率也更高(分别为 2.0、2.8 和 1.6 倍);两组的心脏事件(监管活动医学词典系统器官分类)和感染发生率相似。因 AE 而停药的发生率阿卡替尼组更低(风险比 0.62;95%置信区间 0.41-0.93)。与阿卡替尼相比,伊布替尼的 AE 负担评分总体上更高,特别是在 ECI 心房颤动/扑动、高血压和出血方面。本分析的局限性在于其为开放性研究设计,这可能会影响更主观 AE 的报告。总体而言,基于事件的分析和 AE 负担评分表明,与阿卡替尼相比,伊布替尼的 AE 负担更高,特别是在心房颤动、高血压和出血方面。这项试验在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 上注册,编号为 #NCT02477696。