Suppr超能文献

布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的选择对医疗保险慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者的费用影响

Cost impact of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor selection in Medicare patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

作者信息

Kittai Adam S, Patel Dipen A, Shafrin Jason, Zawadzki Nadine, Shetty Vikram S, Barqawi Yazan K, Rhodes Joanna M

机构信息

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, NY 10029, USA.

AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USA.

出版信息

J Comp Eff Res. 2025 Jun 23:e250035. doi: 10.57264/cer-2025-0035.

Abstract

To estimate cost savings associated with covalent Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (cBTKi) choice in patients with treatment-naive (TN) and relapsed/refractory (RR) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) from a Medicare perspective. An economic model with Markov structure simulated outcomes in patients with CLL initiating ibrutinib, acalabrutinib or zanubrutinib monotherapy. Modeled population included TN and RR patients who had no prior cBTKi. Treatments were dosed per US FDA label and efficacy assumed identical across cBTKis. Cumulative grade ≥3 adverse event (AE) rates were drawn from extended follow-up of cBTKi phase III clinical trials at similar duration. Costs included drug price per 2024 wholesale acquisition cost and AE management medical costs from literature, adjusted for Medicare reimbursement. Outcomes were total change in payer cost over 1, 3 and 5 years. A cohort of 13,726 patients with CLL was modeled (44% TN, 56% RR). Acalabrutinib's aggregate grade ≥3 AE rate was 25.8% points less in TN patients (35.8% vs 61.6%) and 8.0% points less in RR patients (75.0% vs 83.0%) compared with ibrutinib, and 20.6% points less in TN patients (35.8% vs 56.4%) and 11.1% points less in RR patients (75.0% vs 86.1%) compared with zanubrutinib. Acalabrutinib saved $15,478 more per patient versus ibrutinib in year 1 due to lower treatment cost (-$12,076) and lower AE cost (-$3402). Acalabrutinib also saved $1901 more per patient versus zanubrutinib as acalabrutinib higher treatment cost (+$1663) was offset by lower AE cost (-$3563). Across all patients, acalabrutinib saved $212 million more versus ibrutinib and $26 million more versus zanubrutinib from a Medicare perspective. Acalabrutinib cost savings persisted over 3 and 5 years. Acalabrutinib yielded cost savings versus ibrutinib and zanubrutinib for patients with CLL in Medicare due to lower treatment cost versus ibrutinib and fewer grade ≥3 AEs versus both ibrutinib and zanubrutinib.

摘要

从医疗保险的角度评估初治(TN)和复发/难治性(RR)慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)患者选择共价布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(cBTKi)所带来的成本节约。

一个具有马尔可夫结构的经济模型模拟了开始接受伊布替尼、阿卡拉布替尼或泽布替尼单药治疗的CLL患者的预后。模型人群包括未接受过cBTKi治疗的TN和RR患者。治疗剂量按照美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的标签规定,并且假设不同cBTKi的疗效相同。≥3级不良事件(AE)的累积发生率来自cBTKi III期临床试验在相似时长下的延长随访。成本包括2024年批发采购成本的药品价格以及根据文献得出的AE管理医疗成本,并根据医疗保险报销进行了调整。结局指标是1年、3年和5年期间支付方成本的总变化。

对一组13726例CLL患者进行了建模(44%为TN患者,56%为RR患者)。与伊布替尼相比,阿卡拉布替尼在TN患者中的≥3级AE总发生率低25.8个百分点(35.8%对61.6%),在RR患者中低8.0个百分点(75.0%对83.0%);与泽布替尼相比,阿卡拉布替尼在TN患者中的≥3级AE总发生率低20.6个百分点(35.8%对56.4%),在RR患者中低11.1个百分点(75.0%对86.1%)。由于治疗成本较低(-1,2076美元)和AE成本较低(-3402美元),阿卡拉布替尼在第1年比伊布替尼为每位患者多节省15,478美元。阿卡拉布替尼比泽布替尼为每位患者多节省1901美元,因为阿卡拉布替尼较高的治疗成本(+1663美元)被较低的AE成本(-3563美元)所抵消。从医疗保险的角度来看,在所有患者中,阿卡拉布替尼比伊布替尼多节省2.12亿美元,比泽布替尼多节省2600万美元。阿卡拉布替尼的成本节约在3年和5年期间持续存在。

由于与伊布替尼相比治疗成本较低,且与伊布替尼和泽布替尼相比≥3级AE较少,阿卡拉布替尼为医疗保险覆盖的CLL患者带来了相对于伊布替尼和泽布替尼的成本节约。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验