Department of Vascular Surgery, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.
Section of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Dec;78(6):1369-1375. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.06.020. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Endovascular thoracoabdominal and pararenal aortic aneurysm repair is more complex and requires more devices than infrarenal aneurysm repair. It is unclear if current reimbursement covers the cost of delivering this more advanced form of vascular care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the economics of fenestrated-branched (FB-EVAR) physician-modified endograft (PMEG) repairs.
We obtained technical and professional cost and revenue data for four consecutive fiscal years (July 1, 2017, to June 30, 2021) at our quaternary referral institution. Inclusion criteria were patients who underwent PMEG FB-EVAR in a uniform fashion by a single surgeon for thoracoabdominal/pararenal aortic aneurysms. Patients in industry-sponsored clinical trials or receiving Cook Zenith Fenestrated grafts were excluded. Financial data were analyzed for the index operation. Technical costs were divided into direct costs that included devices and billable supplies and indirect costs including overhead.
62 patients (79% male, mean age: 74 years, 66% thoracoabdominal aneurysms) met inclusion criteria. The mean aneurysm size was 6.0 cm, the mean total operating time was 219 minutes, and the median hospital length of stay was 2 days. PMEGs were created with a mean number of 3.7 fenestrations, using a mean of 8.6 implantable devices per case. The average technical cost per case was $71,198, and the average technical reimbursement was $57,642, providing a net negative technical margin of $13,556 per case. Of this cohort, 31 patients (50%) were insured by Medicare remunerated under diagnosis-related group code 268/269. Their respective average technical reimbursement was $41,293, with a mean negative margin of $22,989 per case, with similar findings for professional costs. The primary driver of technical cost was implantable devices, accounting for 77% of total technical cost per case over the study period. The total operating margin, including technical and professional cost and revenue, for the cohort during the study period was negative $1,560,422.
PMEG FB-EVAR for pararenal/thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms produces a substantially negative operating margin for the index operation driven largely by device costs. Device cost alone already exceeds total technical revenue and presents an opportunity for cost reduction. In addition, increased reimbursement for FB-EVAR, especially among Medicare beneficiaries, will be important to facilitate patient access to such innovative technology.
目的/背景:血管内胸腹主动脉和肾周腹主动脉瘤修复比肾下动脉瘤修复更复杂,需要更多的设备。目前尚不清楚现行的报销是否涵盖提供这种更先进的血管护理形式的成本。本研究的目的是评估开窗分支(FB-EVAR)医师改良移植物(PMEG)修复的经济学。
我们在我们的四级转诊机构获得了连续四个财政年度(2017 年 7 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 30 日)的技术和专业成本及收入数据。纳入标准为接受单一外科医生采用统一方式进行胸腹/肾周主动脉瘤 PMEG FB-EVAR 的患者。排除接受工业赞助临床试验或使用 Cook Zenith 开窗移植的患者。对索引手术进行财务数据分析。技术成本分为直接成本,包括设备和计费用品,以及间接成本,包括间接费用。
62 名患者(79%为男性,平均年龄:74 岁,66%为胸腹主动脉瘤)符合纳入标准。平均动脉瘤大小为 6.0cm,总手术时间平均为 219 分钟,中位住院时间为 2 天。PMEG 采用 3.7 个开窗,每个病例使用 8.6 个可植入装置。每个病例的平均技术成本为 71198 美元,平均技术报销为 57642 美元,每个病例的净技术负边际为 13556 美元。该队列中有 31 名患者(50%)由医疗保险支付,按诊断相关组代码 268/269 报销。他们各自的平均技术报销为 41293 美元,每个病例的平均负边际为 22989 美元,专业成本也有类似发现。技术成本的主要驱动因素是可植入设备,占每个病例总技术成本的 77%。在此期间,该队列的总手术边际,包括技术和专业成本及收入,为负 1560422 美元。
肾周/胸腹主动脉瘤的 PMEG FB-EVAR 对索引手术产生了实质性的负运营边际,主要由设备成本驱动。仅设备成本就已经超过了总技术收入,这为降低成本提供了机会。此外,增加对 FB-EVAR 的报销,特别是对医疗保险受益人的报销,对于促进患者获得这种创新技术将非常重要。