Safety and efficacy of augmented-rectangle technique versus delta-shaped anastomosis for treating gastric cancer in total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of augmented-rectangle technique (ART) versus delta-shaped anastomosis (DA) for treating gastric cancer in total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

METHODS

In total, 99 patients with distal gastric cancer who underwent ART (n = 60) or DA (n = 39) were considered. Operative data, postoperative recovery, complications, quality of life, and endoscopic findings of both groups were compared.

RESULTS

The ART group had faster postoperative recovery than the DA group, and was better than DA regarding complications. The mode of reconstruction remained an independent predictor of complications, but not postoperative recovery. Dumping syndrome occurred in 3 (5.0%) and 2 patients (5.1%) of ART and DA groups within 30 days after surgery, and 3 (5.0%) and 2 patients (5.1%) 1 year after surgery. Regarding global health status on the EORTC-QLQ-C30 scale, the ART group had better outcomes than the DA group. Gastritis occurred in 38 (63.3%) and 27 (69.3%) patients of ART and DA groups, respectively. Residual food occurred in 8 (13.3%) and 11 (28.2%) patients of ART and DA groups. Reflux esophagitis occurred in 5 (8.3%) and 4 (10.3%) patients of ART and DA groups. Further, bile reflux occurred in 8 (13.3%) and 4 (10.3%) patients of ART and DA groups.

CONCLUSIONS

ART has similar advantages to DA for total laparoscopic reconstruction and is superior to DA regarding the incidence of complications, complication grade, and global health status. Furthermore, ART may have potential advantages in postoperative recovery and anastomotic stenosis.