Radiation Oncology Department, National Center for Cancer Care and Research, Doha, Qatar.
J Xray Sci Technol. 2023;31(5):1013-1033. doi: 10.3233/XST-230079.
Accurate and fast dose calculation is crucial in modern radiation therapy. Four dose calculation algorithms (AAA, AXB, CCC, and MC) are available in Varian Eclipse and RaySearch Laboratories RayStation Treatment Planning Systems (TPSs).
This study aims to evaluate and compare dosimetric accuracy of the four dose calculation algorithms applying to homogeneous and heterogeneous media, VMAT plans (based on AAPM TG-119 test cases), and the surface and buildup regions.
The four algorithms are assessed in homogeneous (IAEA-TECDOCE 1540) and heterogeneous (IAEA-TECDOC 1583) media. Dosimetric evaluation accuracy for VMAT plans is then analyzed, along with the evaluation of the accuracy of algorithms applying to the surface and buildup regions.
Tests conducted in homogeneous media revealed that all algorithms exhibit dose deviations within 5% for various conditions, with pass rates exceeding 95% based on recommended tolerances. Additionally, the tests conducted in heterogeneous media demonstrate high pass rates for all algorithms, with a 100% pass rate observed for 6 MV and mostly 100% pass rate for 15 MV, except for CCC, which achieves a pass rate of 94%. The results of gamma index pass rate (GIPR) for dose calculation algorithms in IMRT fields show that GIPR (3% /3 mm) for all four algorithms in all evaluated tests based on TG119, are greater than 97%. The results of the algorithm testing for the accuracy of superficial dose reveal variations in dose differences, ranging from -11.9% to 7.03% for 15 MV and -9.5% to 3.3% for 6 MV, respectively. It is noteworthy that the AXB and MC algorithms demonstrate relatively lower discrepancies compared to the other algorithms.
This study shows that generally, two dose calculation algorithms (AXB and MC) that calculate dose in medium have better accuracy than other two dose calculation algorithms (CCC and AAA) that calculate dose to water.
在现代放射治疗中,准确快速的剂量计算至关重要。瓦里安 Eclipse 和 RaySearch Laboratories RayStation 治疗计划系统(TPS)中提供了四种剂量计算算法(AAA、AXB、CCC 和 MC)。
本研究旨在评估和比较这四种剂量计算算法在同质和异质介质、VMAT 计划(基于 AAPM TG-119 测试案例)以及表面和建成区的剂量计算准确性。
在同质(IAEA-TECDOCE 1540)和异质(IAEA-TECDOC 1583)介质中评估了这四种算法。然后分析了 VMAT 计划的剂量评估准确性,以及算法在表面和建成区的应用准确性评估。
在同质介质的测试中,所有算法在各种条件下的剂量偏差均在 5%以内,通过率超过推荐容差的 95%。此外,在异质介质的测试中,所有算法的通过率均较高,除 CCC 外,所有算法的通过率均为 100%,其中 6MV 的通过率为 100%,15MV 的通过率大多为 100%,仅 CCC 的通过率为 94%。在 IMRT 场中,剂量计算算法的伽马指数通过率(GIPR)测试结果表明,所有四个算法在基于 TG119 的所有评估测试中的 GIPR(3%/3mm)均大于 97%。算法对浅层剂量准确性的测试结果显示,剂量差异从 15MV 的-11.9%到 7.03%和 6MV 的-9.5%到 3.3%不等。值得注意的是,AXB 和 MC 算法与其他算法相比,差异相对较小。
本研究表明,在计算中质剂量方面,通常两种剂量计算算法(AXB 和 MC)比另外两种剂量计算算法(CCC 和 AAA)的准确性更高。