European Master in Health Economics and Management, MCI Management Center Innsbruck Internationale Hochschule GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria.
Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health and Acting Director of the Research Center in Health Administration (HEAD), University of Milan, Milano, Italy.
Health Serv Manage Res. 2024 Aug;37(3):160-173. doi: 10.1177/09514848231186773. Epub 2023 Jul 2.
A conspicuous consequence of gatekeeping arrangements in universal, tax-funded, single-payer health care systems is the long waiting times. Besides limiting equal access to care, long waiting times can have a negative impact on health outcomes. Long waiting times can create obstacles in a patient's care pathway. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries have implemented various strategies to tackle this issue, but there is little evidence for which approach is the most effective. This literature review examined waiting times for ambulatory care. The aim was to identify the main policies or combinations of policies universal, tax-funded, and single-payer healthcare systems have implemented to improve the governance of outpatient waiting times. Starting from 1040 potentially eligible articles, a total of 41 studies were identified via a 2-step selection process. Despite the relevance of the issue, the literature is limited. A set of 15 policies for the governance of ambulatory waiting time was identified and categorized by the type of intervention: generation of supply capacity, control of demand, and mixed interventions. Even if a primary intervention was always identifiable, rarely a policy was implemented solo. The most frequent primary strategies were: guidelines implementation and/or clinical pathways, including triage, guidelines for referral and maxim waiting times (14 studies), task shifting (9 studies), and telemedicine (6 studies). Most studies were observational, with no data on costs of intervention and impact on clinical outcomes.
全民医保、税收资助、单一支付方医疗体系的把关安排的一个显著后果是长时间的候诊。除了限制平等获得医疗服务的机会外,长时间的候诊还可能对健康结果产生负面影响。长时间的候诊可能会在患者的治疗路径上造成障碍。经济合作与发展组织(OECD)国家已经实施了各种策略来解决这个问题,但对于哪种方法最有效,几乎没有证据。本文献综述考察了门诊护理的候诊时间。目的是确定全民医保、税收资助、单一支付方医疗体系为改善门诊候诊时间管理而实施的主要政策或政策组合。通过两步筛选过程,从 1040 篇可能符合条件的文章中总共确定了 41 项研究。尽管这个问题很重要,但文献仍然有限。确定了一套 15 项门诊候诊时间管理政策,并按干预类型进行分类:供应能力的产生、需求的控制和混合干预。即使总是可以确定一个主要干预措施,但很少有政策是单独实施的。最常见的主要策略包括:实施指南和/或临床路径,包括分诊、转诊指南和最长等待时间(14 项研究)、任务转移(9 项研究)和远程医疗(6 项研究)。大多数研究是观察性的,没有干预成本和对临床结果影响的数据。